Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

The Russian Arbitration Reform: Between Lights and Shadows

Full Text:


Russian system of alternative disputes resolution has experienced relevant development over the last few years. On December 2015, the Russian President signed two laws, which entered into force on 1 September 2016 and substantially reshaped the legal framework for arbitration in the Russian Federation. These are the Federal Law on Arbitration and the Federal Law on Amending Certain Legislative Acts, which introduced amendments to various laws including International Commercial Arbitration Law, Arbitrazh (Commercial) Procedural Code and Civil Procedural Code. The present article provides a comment on the key changes introduced by the said reform, compared to the previous state-of-play. Special attention has been given to the validity of the arbitration agreement, the arbitrability of international disputes and the denial of enforcement of an arbitral award for matters of public policy. Starting from the evolution of the Russian Supreme Court’s approach to the ground for refusal of enforcement of an international award, the article discusses the recent judgments of the Russian courts in relation to the enforcement of an arbitral award to identify the lights and shadows of the international arbitration system in Russia.

About the Author

Lorenzo Sasso
Moscow State Institute of International Relations
Russian Federation
Professor of International Commercial Law, School of Governance and Politics, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (76 Vernadskogo Av., Moscow, 119454)


1. Asoskov A.V. & Kucher A.N. Are Russian Courts Able to Keep Control over the Unruly Horse? The Long-Awaited Guidance of the Russia’s Highest Commercial Court on the Concept of Public Policy, 30(5) Journal of international Arbitration 581 (2013).

2. Davydenko D. & Kurzynsky-Singer E. Substantive Ordre Public in Russian Case Law on the Recognition, Enforcement and Setting Aside of International Arbitral Awards, 20(2) American review of international Arbitration 209 (2009).

3. Hendrix G. & Nikiforov I. International Commercial Arbitration Practice in the Russian Federation in International Commercial Arbitration Practice: 21st Century Perspectives Ch. 12 (h.A. Grigera Naón & P.e. Mason (eds.), London: Lexis Nexis, 2010).

4. Hsu L. Public Policy Considerations in International Arbitration: Costs and Other Issues A View from Singapore, 26(1) Journal of international Arbitration 101 (2009).

5. Ivanov M. & Manassyan I. Russia in International Arbitration Review 406 (J.h. Carter (ed.), 9th ed., London: Law Business research Ltd., 2018).

6. Karabelnikov B. & Pellew D. Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards in Russia – Still a Mixed Picture, 19(1) iCC international Court of Arbitration Bulletin 65 (2008).

7. Khodykin R. Arbitration Law of Russia: Practice and Procedure (New york: Juris, 2013).

8. Kokorin I. & Timmermans W.A. Arbitration Reform in Russia: Will Russia Become More Arbitration-Friendly?, 22 tijdschrift voor Arbitrage 50 (2017).

9. Kostin A. & Davydenko D. Russia in Law and Practice of International Arbitration in the CIS Region 259 (k. hobér & y. kryvoi (eds.), Alphen aan den rijn: kluwer Law international, 2017).

10. Nikiforov I. Interpretation of Article V of the New York Convention by Russian Courts (Due Process, Arbitrability, and Public Policy Grounds for Non-Enforcement), 25(6) Journal of international Arbitration 787 (2008)

11. Nikiforov I. Litigating in Europe: Is the System of Enforcing Judgments Effective? – Enforcement of Judgments in Russia, 1(2) dispute resolution international 233 (2007).

12. Pistor K. Supply and Demand for Contract Enforcement in Russia: Courts, Arbitration, and Private Enforcement, 22(1) review of Central and east european Law 55 (1996).

13. Tapola D.V. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Application of the Public Policy Rule in Russia, 22(1) Arbitration international 151 (2006).

For citation:

Sasso L. The Russian Arbitration Reform: Between Lights and Shadows. Russian Law Journal. 2020;8(2):79-103.

Views: 794

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)