Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Social and Labour Rights of “New” SelfEmployed Persons (and in Particular Self-Employed Platform Workers) in Russia

Full Text:


In the first part of the article, the business model of “work on demand” in Russia is described, and the nature and functions of platform providers with particular reference to labour disputes concerning the classification of platform workers are analysed. Furthermore, the author discusses options concerning the labour protection of platform workers. Taking into account that workers on demand are classified as self-employed in case law and in practice, the second part of this article reflects implications for tax and social law. Particular attention is paid to the tax holidays of 2017–2019 and the tax on professional income. Hereby the access to social protection for self-employed persons in general, and for those self-employed who use privileged tax regimes in particular, is analysed. In the light of these reflections, the false incentives of the tax on professional income are investigated. Finally, some conclusions are offered, to explain the interrelationship between labour, social and tax law. Coordination of legislative measures and reforms in labour law, in social law and in tax law is seen as a way to improve the situation of workers on demand.

About the Author

Olga Chesalina
Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy
Senior Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy (33 Amalienstr., Munich, 80799)


1. Chesalina O. Temporary Agency Work in the Russian Federation, 28(1) Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Arbeits- und sozialrecht 34 (2014).

2. Davidov G. Subordination vs. Domination: Exploring the Differences, 33(3) international Journal of Comparative Labour Law & industrial relations 365 (2017).

3. Davidov G. The Status of Uber Drivers: A Purposive Approach, 6(1-2) spanish Labour Law and employment relations Journal 6 (2017).

4. Davletgildeev R.Sh. & Klimovskaya L.R. Legal Status of Platform Workers in Russia: Right on Unemployment and Social Assistance, 7(6) humanities & social sciences reviews 639 (2019).

5. De le Court A. Formalising Vulnerable Self-Employment Under Social Security Law: A Case-Study of Continental Welfare State Systems, 144 revista del Ministerio de trabajo, Migraciones y seguridad social 57 (2019).

6. Del Punta R. Labour Market Reforms and Beyond: The Italian Case, 35(3) international Journal of Comparative Labour Law & industrial relations 355 (2019).

7. Gyulavári t. Casual Work Laws in Eastern Europe in Festschrift Franz Marhold 449 (e. Brameshuber et al. (eds.), vienna: Manz, 2020).

8. Marhold F. Social Protection of Contingent Work: Austria and the Full Coverage Social Insurance System in Core and Contingent Work in the European Union: A Comparative Analysis 233 (e. Ales et al. (eds.), Oxford and Portland, Oregon: hart Publishing, 2017).

9. Perulli A. The Notion of Employee in Need of Redefinition in Festschrift Franz Marhold 703 (e. Brameshuber et al. (eds.), vienna: Manz, 2020). Prassl J. Humans as a Service (Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2018).

10. Stevens y. Social Security and the Platform Economy in Belgium: Dilemma and Paradox in The Platform Economy: Unravelling the Legal Status of Online Intermediaries 259 (B. Devolder (ed.), Cambridge; Antwerp; Chicago: intersentia, 2018).

11. Tsindeliani I. et al. Tax System of the Russian Federation: Current State and Steps towards Financial Sustainability, 11(24) sustainability 6994 (2019).

12. Cooke L. 2018/9 Uber’s Work Status Appeal Rejected (UK), 3(1) european employment Law Cases 41 (2018).

For citation:

Chesalina O. Social and Labour Rights of “New” SelfEmployed Persons (and in Particular Self-Employed Platform Workers) in Russia. Russian Law Journal. 2020;8(2):49-78.

Views: 1308

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)