Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Constitutional Defence Against the “Enemies” of Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Russian Experience

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-2-28-48

Full Text:

Abstract

Democratic constitutional order is occasionally threatened by anti-democratic forces, and thus, requires special protection. The concept of militant democracy has been developed to provide adequate defensive mechanisms. In this article, we discuss positive aspects of their application, but also highlight the risks of abusing these defensive mechanisms. Essentially, the problems are associated with narrowing the political space and favouring the dominant political force. Fragile democracies, including Russia, are particularly vulnerable to such exposure. A targeted study of Russian legislation and the caselaw of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation has allowed us to identify the prerequisites for effective implementation of the doctrine of self-defence in line with the principles of constitutionalism.

About the Authors

Tatiana Khramova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Associated Professor, Law Faculty, National research university higher school of economics (3 Bolshoy tryokhsvyatitelsky Pereulok, Moscow, 109028)


Alexandra Troitskaya
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Associated Professor, Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow state university (1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991)


References

1. Fox G.h. & Nolte G. Intolerant Democracies, 36(1) harvard international Law Journal 1 (1995).

2. Frankenberg G. The Learning Sovereign in Constitutionalism: New Challenges: European Law from a Nordic Perspective 17 (J. Nergelius (ed.) Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163485.i-164.12

3. Ginsburgt. &huq A.Z.How to Save aConstitutional Democracy(Chicago:university of Chicago Press, 2019). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226564418.001.0001

4. Harvey P. Militant Democracy and the European Court of Human Rights, 29(3) european Law review 407 (2004).

5. Henkin L. A New Birth of Constitutionalism: Genetic Influences and Genetic Defects in Constitutionalism, Identity, Difference and Legitimacy: Theoretical Perspectives 39 (M. rosenfeld (ed.), durham: duke university Press, 1994). https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822396406-002

6. Invernizzi Accetti C. & Zuckerman i. What’s Wrong with Militant Democracy, 65(1) Political studies 182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715614849

7. Issacharoff S. Fragile Democracies, 120(6) harvard Law review 1405 (2007).

8. Kelsen H. Absolutism and Relativism in Philosophy and Politics, 42(5) American Political science review 906 (1948). https://doi.org/10.2307/1950135

9. Loewenstein K. Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I, 31(3) American Political science review 417 (1937). https://doi.org/10.2307/1948164

10. Macklem P. Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of SelfDetermination, 4(3) international Journal of Constitutional Law 488 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol017

11. Mannheim K. Diagnosis of Our Time: Wartime Essays of Sociologist. Vol. III (London: kegan Paul, trench, trubner & Co., 1943). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315888668

12. Molier G. & rijpkema B. Germany’s New Militant Democracy Regime: National Democratic Party II and the German Federal Constitutional Court’s “Potentiality” Criterion for Party Bans, 14(2) european Constitutional Law review 394 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1017/s1574019618000196

13. Müller J.-w. Militant Democracy in Comparative Constitutional Law (M. rosenfeld & A. sajo (eds.), Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2012).

14. Müller J.-w. Protecting Popular Self-Government From the People? New Normative Perspectives on Militant Democracy, 19 Annual review of Political science 249 (2016).

15. O’Connell R. Militant Democracy and Human Rights Principles, 1 Constitutional Law review 84 (2009).

16. Oppenheim F. Relativism, Absolutism, and Democracy, 44(4) American Political science review 951 (1950).

17. Posner R.A. Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency (New york: Oxford university Press, 2006).

18. Sajó A. & uitz R. The Constitution of Freedom: An Introduction of Legal Constitutionalism (New york: Oxford university Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198732174.001.0001

19. Sajó A. Militant Democracy and Transition Towards Democracy in Militant Democracy 209 (A. sajo (ed.). Amsterdam: eleven international Publishing, 2004).

20. Sajó A. The Self-Protecting Constitutional State, 12(2/3) east european Constitutional review 78 (2003).

21. Sakwa R. Russian Politics and Society (3rd ed., London: routledge, 2002). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203465660

22. Sartori J. Constitutionalism: A Preliminary Discussion, 56(4) American Political science review 853 (1962). https://doi.org/10.2307/1952788

23. Teitel R. Militant Democracy: Comparative Constitutional Perspectives, 29(1)

24. Michigan Journal of international Law 49 (2007).

25. Tyulkina S. Militant Democracy: An Alien Concept for Australian Constitutional Law?, 36(2) Adelaide Law review 517 (2015).


For citation:


Khramova T., Troitskaya A. Constitutional Defence Against the “Enemies” of Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Russian Experience. Russian Law Journal. 2020;8(2):28-48. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-2-28-48

Views: 739


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)
X