Force Majeure and Unforeseen Change of Circumstances. The Case of Embargoes and Currency Fluctuations (Russian, German and French Approaches)

Full Text:


Economic and political instability has become a characteristic of many societies around the globe. Recent examples revealing the volatility of the current state of affairs include the trade restrictions imposed by the Russian Federation in August 2014, and currency fluctuations experienced by many countries, including Russia and potentially Greece. In this situation, one may wonder whether contract law has a solution to offer to the parties affected. Traditionally dominated by the pacta sunt servanda principle, jurisdictions made their own choices. This paper analyses approaches adopted by Russian, German and French law in response to situations of force majeure (trade embargoes)and unforeseen change of circumstances (currency fluctuations). In search for an explanation of each given approach, we reviewed historical arguments, as history played a crucial role in the formation of German and French responses, though in a completely different way. Whereas Germany, heavily affected by the cataclysms of the World Wars, was eager to adopt a lenient view on the possibility of the judicial revision of contracts, France never gave up its suspicion of court interventions. As legal preferences are often connected with cultural factors, we looked at distinct cultural traits of the societies at issue, by using the Hofstede index. We realized that there could be compelling cultural reasons why France and Germany are situated at opposite poles, while Russia is somewhere in the middle. Lastly, we took into account considerations derived from law and economics, arguing that narrowly construed court intervention might be economically justified in cases of impossibility and impracticability, as ultimately decreasing transaction and risk-appraisal costs.

About the Authors

Ilya Kokorin
Buzko Kokorin Law Firm
Russian Federation

Attorney-at-Law, Partner at Buzko Kokorin Law Firm, LL.M. (Central European University, Leiden Law School),

9/2 Pulkovskaya str., St. Petersburg, 196158

Jeroen van der Weide
Institute for Private Law

Associate Professor of Private Law, Leiden Law School,

Kamerlingh Onnes Gebouw, Steenschuur 25, Office No. C207, Leiden, 2311 ES


1. Aksoy, Hüseyin C. Impossibility in Modern Private Law: A Comparative Study of German, Swiss and Turkish Laws and the Unification Instruments 11, 172 (Springer 2014).

2. Beale, Hugh, et al. Cases, Materials and Text on Contract Law 1130, 1132–33, 1158 (2nd ed., Hart Pub. 2010).

3. Behavioral Law and Economics (Cass R. Sunstein, ed.) (Cambridge University Press 2000).

4. Bell, John, et al. Principles of French Law 344, 348 (2nd ed., Oxford University Press 2008).

5. Brunner, Christoph. Force Majeure and Hardship under General Contract Principles: Exemption for Non-Performance in International Arbitration 67, 251–52 (Kluwer Law International 2009).

6. Das neue Schuldrecht 108 (Barbara Dauner-Lieb et. al., eds.) (C.F. Müller 2002).

7. David, René, & Vries, Henry P. de. The French Legal System 65 (Oceana Pub. 1958).

8. Dawson, John P. Effects of Inflation on Private Contracts: Germany, 1914–1924, 33(2) Mich. L. Rev. 191 (1934).

9. Fikentscher, Wolfgang, & Heinemann, Andreas. Schuldrecht § 27, 188, 191, 197, 200, 320 (10th ed., De Gruyter 2006).

10. Firoozmand, Mahmoud R. Changed Circumstances and Immutability of Contract: A Comparative Analysis of Force Majeure and Related Doctrines, 8(2) Bus. L. Int’l 171 (2007).

11. Ghozi, Alain. The Effects of Contracts; Contractual Interpretation and Contractual Classification (articles 1134 to 1143), in Reforming the French Law of Obligations. Comparative Reflections on the Avant-projet de reforme du droit obligations et de la prescription (‘the Avant-projet Catala’) 543, 547 (John Cartwright et al., eds.) (Hart Pub. 2009).

12. Gordley, James, & Mehren, Arthur T. von.An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Private Law: Readings, Cases, Materials 99 (Cambridge University Press 2009).

13. Hofstede, Geert, et al. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed., McGraw-Hill 2010).

14. Laithier, Yves-Marie. Comparative Reflections on the French Law of Remedies for Breach of Contract, in Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract 103, 119 (Nili Cohen & Ewan McKendrick, eds.) (Hart Pub. 2005).

15. Luhmann, Niklas. Risk: A Sociological Theory 190 (Rhodes Barret, trans.) (De Gruyter 1993).

16. Malaurie, Philippe, et al. Les obligations 469, 499, 509, 514 (5th ed., Defrénois 2011).

17. Markesinis, Basil S., et al. The German Law of Contract: A Comparative Treatise 407, 413, 485 (2nd ed., Hart Pub. 2006).

18. Nicholas, Barry. Force Majeure in French Law, in Force Majeure and Frustration of Contract 21, 26–27 (Ewan McKendrick, ed.) (2nd ed., Informa Law from Routledge 2013).

19. Posner, Richard A., & Rosenfield, Andrew M. Impossibility and Related Doctrines in Contract Law: An Economic Analysis, 6(1) J. Legal Stud. 83, 88, 91, 101 (1977).

20. Rémy-Corlay, Pauline. Structural Elements of the French Civil Code, in The Architecture of European Codes and Contract Law 33, 50 (Stefan Grundmann & Martin Schauer, eds.) (Kluwer Law International 2006).

21. Renner, Shirley. Inflation and the Enforcement of Contracts 15 (Edward Elgar Pub. 1999).

22. Ridder, Philip, & Weller, Marc-Philippe. Unforeseen Circumstances, Hardship, Impossibility and Force Majeure under German Contract Law, 22 European Review of Private Law 371, 373 (2014).

23. Schlechtriem & Schwenzer: Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1071 (Ingeborg Schwenzer, ed.) (3rd ed., Oxford University Press 2010).

24. Schlechtriem, Peter. Schuldrecht: Allgemeiner Teil 151 (Mohr Siebeck 2003).

25. Steiner, Eva. French Law: A Comparative Approach 335 (Oxford University Press 2010).

26. Terré, François, et al. Les obligations 582, 585, 588 (10th ed., Dalloz 2009).

27. The Effects of Currency Fluctuations on the Economy, Investopedia (Aug. 8, 2013), <> (accessed Jul. 26, 2015).

28. Tourneau, Philippe le. La responsabilité civile 239 (3rd ed., Dalloz 1982).

29. Treitel, Guenter H. Frustration and Force Majeure 508 (2nd ed., Thomson; Sweet & Maxwell 2004).

30. Unexpected Circumstances in European Contract Law 3, 11, 49, 58, 222, 249, 643 (Ewoud Hondius & Hans C. Grigoleit, eds.) (Cambridge University Press 2011).

31. Viney, Geneviève. 5 Traité de droit civil. Les obligations. La responsabilité 398 (Jacques Ghestin, ed.) (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence 1988).

32. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations: Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition 579 (Clarendon Press 1996).

33. Брагинский М.И, Витрянский В.В. Договорное право. Книга первая: Общие положения [Braginsky M.I., Vitryansky V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pervaya: Obshchie polozheniya [Mikhail I. Braginsky & Vasily V. Vitryansky, Contract Law. Book One: General Provisions]] 359 (Statut 1998).

34. Брагинский М.И, Витрянский В.В. Договорное право. Книга пятая. В двух томах. Т. 1 [Braginsky M.I., Vitryansky V.V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pyataya. V dvukh tomakh. T. 1 [Mikhail I. Braginsky & Vasily V. Vitryansky, Contract Law. 1 Book Five]] (Statut 2006).

35. Николюкин С.В. Основания оcвобождения от ответственности в практике международного коммерческого арбитража // Право и экономика. 2009. № 5. C. 96–101 [Nikolyukin S.V. Osnovaniya osvobozhdeniya ot otvetstvennosti v praktike mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha // Pravo i ekonomika. 2009. No. 5. S. 96–101 [Stanislav V. Nikolyukin, Grounds for Release from Liability in Case Law of International Commercial Arbitration, 2009(5) Law and Economics 96–101]].

Supplementary files

For citation: Kokorin I., van der Weide J. Force Majeure and Unforeseen Change of Circumstances. The Case of Embargoes and Currency Fluctuations (Russian, German and French Approaches). Russian Law Journal. 2015;3(3):46-82.

Views: 6686


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)