On the Rule of Law in the Context of Russian Foreign Policy


https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-2-10-36

Full Text:


Abstract

The article is an attempt to analyze the Russian school of law features and history of development over the last century, characterized by the priority of the positivist theory of law over the natural law approach. In particular, the author examines the differences in interpretation of such concepts as ‘rule of law,’ ‘rule by law’ and ‘Law-Bound State’ by Russian and foreign lawyers and concludes that these concepts are mixed and misunderstood. Based on the differences of interpretation, the author concludes that there is a significant difference in mentality not only between Russian and foreign lawyers, but also between lawyers in Russia: law enforcers on the one hand and human rights activists, advocates and some independent scientists on the other and, consequently, there are specific criteria for the specialist selection in competent state bodies. As an example of the differences of interpretation, the author analyzes in detail the decision of the Russian Federation Constitutional Court of March 19, 2014, on the constitutionality of the Treaty between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Crimea on the admission of the Republic of Crimea into the Russian Federation and the establishment of new subjects within the latter.


About the Author

Elena Lukyanova
National Research University – Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Russian Federation

Professor of Constitutional Law at National Research University – Higher School of Economics, Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law at the Faculty of Law (17 Malaya Ordynka str., Moscow, 119017,Russia



References

1. Holovaty, Serhiy. 1–3 The Rule of Law LXIV, 1747 (Phoenix Publishing House 2006).

2. Report on the Rule of Law, Venice Comm’n, 86th Sess., ¶ 15, Study No. 512/2009 (CDL-AD(2011)003rev) (2011), available at <http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/ documents/CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e.aspx> (accessed May 15, 2015).

3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, May 23, 1969, Art. 25(1), U.N. Doc. A/ Conf.39/27, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331, 8 I.L.M. 679 (1969), at <https://treaties.un.org/doc/ Treaties/1980/01/19800127%2000-52%20AM/Ch_XXIII_01p.pdf> (accessed May

4. , 2015).

5. Баренбойм П.Д. Концепция Зорькина – Танчева о соотношении современных доктрин верховенства права и правового государства // Законоательство и экономика. 2011. № 10 [Barenboim P.D. Kontseptsiya Zorkina – Tancheva o sootnoshenii sovremennykh doktrin verkhovenstva prava i pravovogo gosudarstva // Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika. 2011. No. 10 [Pyotr D. Barenboim, Zorkin – Tanchev Concept of Relationship between the Modern Doctrines of Rule of Law and Law-Bound State, 2011(10) Legislation and Economy]], available at <http://philosophicalclub.ru/content/docs/vt/voprosy_teorii.pdf> (accessed May 15, 2015).

6. Голубок С.А. О соответствии международному праву односторонней декларации независимости Косово. Консультативное заключение Международного суда ООН от 22 июля 2010 года // Международное правосудие. 2011. № 1 [Golubok S.A. O sootvetstvii mezhdunarodnomu pravu odnostoronnei deklaratsii nezavisimosti Kosovo. Konsultativnoe zaklyuchenie Mezhdunarodnogo suda OON ot 22 iyulya 2010 goda // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie. 2011. No. 1 [Sergey A. Golubok, Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo. Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice of July 22, 2010, 2011(1) International Justice]].

7. Гордиенко И. «Я федеральный судья, а не продавщица» // Новая газета. 2008. № 95 [Gordienko I. ‘Ya federal’nyi sud’ya, a ne prodavshchitsa’ // Novaya gazeta. 2008. No. 95 [Irina Gordienko, ‘I Am a Federal Judge, Not a Shop Assistant,’ 2008(95) New Gazette]], available at <http://www.novayagazeta.ru/politics/37492.html> (accessed May 15, 2015).

8. Зорькин В.Д. Конституционное развитие России [Zorkin V.D. Konstitutsionnoe razvitie Rossii [Valery D. Zorkin, Russia’s Constitutional Development]] 52–53 (Norma 2011).

9. Зорькин В.Д. Позитивистская теория права в России [Zorkin V.D. Positivistskaya teoriya prava v Rossii [Valery D. Zorkin, Positive Law Theory in Russia]] (Moscow University Press 1978).

10. Зорькин В.Д. Цивилизация права [Zorkin V.D. Tsivilizatsiya prava [Valery D. Zorkin, Civilization of Law]], Rossiiskaya Gazeta (Mar. 12, 2014), <http://www.rg.ru/2014/03/12/ zorkin.html> (accessed May 15, 2015).

11. История политических и правовых учений: Учебник для вузов [Istoriya politicheskikh i pravovykh uchenii: Uchebnik dlya vuzov [History of Political and Legal Doctrines: Textbook for High Schools]] (Vladik S. Nersesyants, ed.) (4th ed., Norma 2004).

12. Коркунов Н.М. Сборник статей (1877–1897) [Korkunov N.M. Sbornik statei (1877–1897) [Nikolay M. Korkunov, Collected Articles (1877–97)]] 59 (N.K. Martynov 1898).

13. Крохмалюк А. Верховенство права vs. верховенство закона? // Новая адвокатская газета. 2013. № 21 [Krokhmalyuk A. Verkhovenstvo prava vs. verkhovenstvo zakona? // Novaya advokatskaya gazeta. 2013. No. 21 [Alexander Krokhmalyuk, Rule of Law vs. Rule by Law, 2013(21) New Lawyers Gazette]], available at <http://www. advgazeta.ru/arch/158/1188> (accessed May 15, 2015).

14. Маркедонов С. Косово: декларации или политическая реальность? // Ноев ковчег. 2010. № 9 [Markedonov S. Kosovo: deklaratsii ili politicheskaya real'nost'? // Noev kovcheg. 2010. No. 9 [Sergey Markedonov, Kosovo: Declarations or Political Reality?, 2010(9) Noah’s Ark]], available at <http://noev-kovcheg.ru/mag/2010-09/2195.html> (accessed May 15, 2015).

15. Нерсесянц В.С. Философия права: либертарно-юридическая концепция // Вопросы философии. 2002. № 3 [Nersesyants V.S. Filosofiya prava: libertarnoyuridicheskaya kontseptsiya // Voprosy filosofii. 2002. No. 3 [Vladik S. Nersesyants, Jurisprudence: Libertarian Law Concept, 2002(3) Problems of Philosophy]].

16. Тихомиров Ю.А. Правовое регулирование: теория и практика [Tikhomirov Yu.A. Pravovoye regulirovanie: teoriya i praktika [Yury A. Tikhomirov, Legal Regulation: Theory and Practice]] (Formula prava 2010).

17. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций [Huntington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii [Samuel Huntington, Clash of Civilizations]] (Yury Novikov & Takhir Velimeev, trans.) (AST 2003).

18. Четвернин В.А. Исторический прогресс правовой свободы и цивилизационно-историческая типология [Chetvernin V.A. Istoricheskii progress pravovoi svobody i tsivilizovanno-istoricheskaya tipologiya [Vladimir A. Chetvernin, Historical Progress of Legal Freedom and a Historical Typology of Civilizations]] (2008), <http://www.teoriaprava. hse.ru/nersesyants-conferece/3/57-chetvernin-abstracts> (accessed May 15, 2015).

19. Четвернин В.А. Лекции по теории права и государства [Chetvernin V.A. Lektsii po teorii prava i gosudarstva [Vladimir A. Chetvernin, Lectures on the Theory of Law and State]] (2013), <http://www.teoria-prava-ru.1gb.ru/> (accessed May 15, 2015).

20. Четвернин В.А. Лекции по теории права и государства [Chetvernin V.A. Lektsii po teorii prava i gosudarstva [Vladimir A. Chetvernin, Lectures on the Theory of Law and State]] (2009), <http://audio-booki.ru/tiching/15351-vladimir-chetvernin-lekcii-poteorii-prava-i-gosudarstva-audiokniga.html> (accessed May 15, 2015).


Supplementary files

For citation: Lukyanova E. On the Rule of Law in the Context of Russian Foreign Policy. Russian Law Journal. 2015;3(2):10-36. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2015-3-2-10-36

Views: 2062

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)