Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Institutional and Legal Development of EAEU and EU in Comparative Perspective

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-155-168

Full Text:

Abstract

Despite the relatively short history of its development, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) is becoming more confident about itself as a successful integration project. At the same time, there is a growing interest in the EAEU by the political elite and scientific community in Russia and abroad. The EAEU is investigated from different points of view, but almost no research is carried out without a comparative legal analysis of the EAEU and the European Union (EU). Both unions belong to the same type of integration organizations; the EAEU was largely created in the image of the EU. However, an analysis of the institutional and legal structure of the EAEU and the EU shows there are fundamental differences between the two unions concerning the principles of their functioning. This article substantiates the fact that supranational constitutionalization within the EU is not typical for the EAEU and is even harmful. At the same time, the technical tools developed by the EU can be useful to the EAEU for resolving current challenges of ensuring sustainability and self-affirmation in the international arena. This experience is of importance in view of the crisis experienced by the EU, since only they were able to manifest what institutional and legal decisions are working within the framework of an integration association, and which should be discarded. It is vital that the EAEU not repeat the mistakes and miscalculations of the EU.

About the Authors

Mark Entin
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Professor, Head of EU Law Department

76 Vernadskogo Av., Moscow, 119454



Vadim Voynikov
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Department of International and EU Law

14 Aleksandra Nevskogo st., Kaliningrad, 236016



References

1. European Union Law (C. Barnard & S. Peers (eds.), 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198789130.001.0001

2. Habermas J. The Crisis of the European Union in the Light of a Constitutionalization of International Law, 23(2) European Journal of International Law 335 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs019

3. Hartley T.C. The Foundations of European Union Law (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199566754.001.0001

4. Klabbers J. Sui Generis? The European Union as an International Organizationin A Companion to European Union Law and International Law 1 (D. Patterson & A. Södersten (eds.), Oxford; Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119037712.ch1

5. Klamert M. The Autonomy of the EU (and of EU Law): Through the Kaleidoscope, 42(6) European Law Review 815 (2017).

6. Lavenex S. “Failing Forward” Towards Which Europe? Organized Hypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System, 56(5) JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 1195 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12739

7. Murray P. & Longo M. Europe’s Wicked Legitimacy Crisis: The Case of Refugees, 40(4) Journal of European Integration 411 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1436543

8. Sangiovanni A. Solidarity in the European Union, 33(2) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 213 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs033


For citation:


Entin M., Voynikov V. Institutional and Legal Development of EAEU and EU in Comparative Perspective. Russian Law Journal. 2019;7(3):155-168. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-3-155-168

Views: 143


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)