Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

International Universal Unification of the Conflict-of-Law Regulation of Cross-Border Unfair Competition

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-2-101-127

Full Text:

Abstract

This article puts forward that there are diverse and sound grounds preventing the universal treaty regulating comprehensively the issues of legal protection from crossborder unfair competition by substantive norms from being worked out in the near future. The development of the universal unification of the conflict-of-law rules on the law applicable to the private relations arising out of unfair competition as a possible alternative is also proposed and substantiated. The authors give some possible reasons for the absence of such a treaty and demonstrate the results that have been achieved so far in this field. The concept of the Draft of the relevant Convention is drawn up. The conclusion is made that the latter needs to be centered on the lex mercatus as a single connecting factor (due to its advantages of predictability, account of the interests of the state where the effected market is situated etc.). Furthermore, the Convention should not provide for party autonomy, should set forth the detailed rules for the legal characterization of the basic terms of the Convention, including the scope of the applicable law as well as the public policy clause and the norms on the overriding mandatory provisions.

About the Authors

Bohdan Rebrysh
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University.
Ukraine

Assistant Professor, Private International Law and Comparative Law Department.

77 Pushkinskaya St., Kharkiv, 61024.



Natalia Maskayeva
Belarusian State University.
Belarus

Associate Professor, Private International and European Law Department.

4 Nezavisimosti Av., Minsk, 220030.



References

1. Barraclough A. & Waincymer J. Mandatory Rules of Law in International Commercial Arbitration, 6(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 205 (2005).

2. Davis J. Why the United Kingdom Should Have a Law Against Misappropriation, 69(3) Cambridge Law Journal 561 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197310000802

3. De Boer T.M. Party Autonomy and Its Limitations in the Rome II Regulation, 9 Yearbook of Private International Law 19 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866537200.1.19

4. Dickinson A.A. The Rome II Regulation: The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199289684.001.0001

5. Dornis T.W. Trademark and Unfair Competition Conflicts: Historical-Comparative, Doctrinal, and Economic Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316651285

6. Gülören T. The 2007 Turkish Code Concerning Private International Law and International Civil Procedure, 9 Yearbook of Private International Law 313 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866537200.2.313

7. Robertson A. & Horton A. Does the UK or the EC Need an Unfair Competition Law?, 17 European Intellectual Property Review 568 (1995).

8. Rome II Regulation: Pocket Commentary (P. Huber (ed.), Munich: Sellier European Law Publishers, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866539020


For citation:


Rebrysh B., Maskayeva N. International Universal Unification of the Conflict-of-Law Regulation of Cross-Border Unfair Competition. Russian Law Journal. 2019;7(2):101-127. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-2-101-127

Views: 411


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)