The Adversarial System in the Criminal Process of Ukraine: Technical and Legal Aspects
This article substantiates the author’s scientific concept of electronic criminal proceedings, as regards the use thereof in the adversarial system, which would involve the formation of criminal proceedings as an electronic file, and the procedural interaction of the subjects of proceedings in an electronic law enforcement environment. The tasks of this article are as follows: analysis of issues that may arise when establishing such adversarial system in the criminal process of Ukraine; study of foreign experience of involving a defense lawyer in electronic criminal procedural processes; and development of proposals for improving the domestic practice of law enforcement.
The Uniform Register of Pre-trial Investigations (URPI) has been defined as an electronic procedural document and an integral segment of criminal proceedings. The analysis of the electronic segment of the pre-trial investigation shows that the lawyer’s procedural status needs to be improved by his/her involvement in the URPI. Based on the analysis of the experience of electronic criminal proceedings in the province of Alberta (Canada), the Czech Republic, Sweden, and Kazakhstan, proposals have been drawn up to bring the defense to the URPI.
As a result of the study, the author identified the legal and technical aspects of involving an attorney in electronic criminal proceedings, which suggested successive practical steps in creating personal virtual accounts, an algorithm for involving a defense lawyer in proceedings, and reforming the Uniform Register of Lawyers of Ukraine (URLU) as an electronic procedural legalization instrument.
About the AuthorAnton Stolitnii
Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
70B Zhukovskogo St., Zaporizhia, 69002, Ukraine
1. Epps D. Adversarial Asymmetry in the Criminal Process, 4 (91) New York University Law Review 762 (2016).
2. Findley K.A. Adversarial Inquisitions: Rethinking the Search for Truth, 56 New York Law school Law Review 911 (2011).
3. Kirchengast T. Victim Lawyers, Victim Advocates, and the Adversarial Criminal Trial, 16 (4) New Criminal Law Review 568 (2013).
4. Langbein J.H. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
5. Meulli K.J. Prosecutorial Discretion in an Adversary System, 1992 (3) ByuLaw Review 669 (1992).
6. Ogg J.T. Adversary and Adversity: Converging Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems of Justice – a Case Study of the Italian Criminal Trial Reforms, 37 (1) International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 31 (2013).
For citation: Stolitnii A. The Adversarial System in the Criminal Process of Ukraine: Technical and Legal Aspects. Russian Law Journal. 2019;7(1):154-177. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2019-7-1-154-177
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.