Class Actions in Russia
Abstract
The article deals with the issues specific to Russia’s system of class actions. The author of the article on the institution of class actions has taken in consideration the social and legal prerequisites for adopting such an institution as well as international best practices. Particular attention has been paid to the goals of class actions, such as forming a group, representing the interests of a group, financing a class action, as well as permissible limits to a class action.
About the Author
Dmitry Magonya
Managing Partner for ART DE LEX Law Firm
Russian Federation
Managing Partner for Art de Lex Law Firm (Bld 1, 4/17 Pokrovsky Blvd, Moscow, 101000, Russia).
Russian Federation
Managing Partner for Art de Lex Law Firm (Bld 1, 4/17 Pokrovsky Blvd, Moscow, 101000, Russia).
References
1. Abolonin GO, ‘Class Actions in Russian Arbitration Procedural Legislation: Prospects of Development’ (2011) 3 Civil and Arbitration Process 43.
2. Alarie B, ‘Rethinking the Approval of Class Counsel’s Fees in Ontario Class Actions’ (2007) 4 Can Class Action Rev 15.
3. Austl Law Reform Comm’n, Grouped Proceedings in the Federal Court (Report No 46, 1988) para 252.
4. Cappelletti M and Garth B, ‘Access to Justice: The Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective. A General Report’ in M Cappelletti and B Garth (eds), Access to Justice (Sijthoff, Giuffre 1979) vol I, 1, art 36.
5. Garth B, Nagel IH, Plager SJ, ‘The Institution of the Private Attorney General: Perspective from an Empirical Study of Class Action Litigation’ (1988) 61 S Cal L Rev 353, 360.
6. Issacharoff S and Miller GP, ‘Will Aggregate Litigation Come to Europe?’ (2009) 62 Vand L Rev 179, 199.
7. Lindblom H, Per, ‘Swedish report’ in D Maleshin (ed), Civil Procedure in CrossCultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context (Statut 2012) 529.
8. Maleshin D, Russian Civil Procedural Law System: Doctor of Law Dissertation Abstract (Moscow 2011).
9. Morabito V, ‘Contingency Fee Agreements with Represented Persons in Class Actions – An Undesirable Australian Phenomen’ (2005) 34 Common L World Rev 201.
10. Ont Law Reform Comm’n, Report on Class Action (Ministry of the Attorney General 1982) vol I, 130, 139.
11. Rickard L, ‘The Class Action Debate in Europe: Lessons from the U.S. Experience’ The European Financial Review (London, 4 December 2008) <http://www.europeanfinancialreview.com/?p=151>.
12. Walker J, ‘Introduction: Who’s Afraid of U.S.-style Class Actions. A General Report’ in D Maleshin (ed), Civil Procedure in Cross-Cultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context (Statut 2012) 421.
13. Waye V and Morabito V, ‘The Dawning of the Age of the Litigation Entrepreneur’ (2009) 28 Civ Just Q 389, 425.
14. Woolf H, Sir, Access to Justice: Final Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice system in England and Wales (Bernan Assoc 1996) ch 17, para 2.
For citation:
Magonya D. Class Actions in Russia. Russian Law Journal. 2013;1(1):57-65. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2013-1-1-57-65
Views: 1788
Email this article 