Protection of “Exclusive” Groups Only – An Essential Element of Genocide
The crime of genocide, as one of the most complex crimes ever to be examined and prosecuted, is often referred to as the “crime of crimes.” It is never the result of a tragic accident, but always a deliberate, conscious, and intentional act. It is never a single act, but a collection of acts committed by a number of people acting in consort. Several elements of genocide prescribed by the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) distinguish it from other core crimes. The first one is the intention to destroy a protected group – the very specific intention that brings into question the core existence of the group itself. The second element is the focus of the perpetrator’s intent on a particular group; his intent on destruction has to be directed against a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. No other groups are included on that list. Given the significance to the protected group, this paper will focus on some important issues relating to the protected groups and their identifications, both in legal theory and jurisprudence of international courts. It will also cover some considerations on the exclusion of some other groups that are left unprotected from genocide.
About the AuthorSandra Fabijanić Gagro
Associate Professor, Department of International Law, Faculty of Law
Hahlić 6, Rijeka, 51000, Croatia
1. Amann D.M. Group Mentality, Expressivism, and Genocide, 2(2) International Criminal Law Review 93 (2002).
2. Bettwy D.S. The Genocide Convention and Unprotected Groups: Is the Scope of Protection Expanding Under Customary International Law?, 2(1) Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law 167 (2011).
3. Boot M. Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, War Crimes: Nullum Crimen Sine Lege and the Subject Matter Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).
4. Cassese A. International Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
5. Currie R.J. International & Transnational Criminal Law (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010).
6. De Than C. & Shorts E. International Criminal Law and Human Rights (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2003).
7. Goldsmith K. The Issue of Intent in the Genocide Convention and Its Effect on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: Toward a Knowledge-Based Approach, 5(3) Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal 238 (2010).
8. Kreβ C. The International Court of Justice and the Elements of the Crime of Genocide, 18(4) European Journal of International Law 619 (2007).
9. LeBlanc L.J. The United Nations Genocide Convention and Political Groups: Should the United States Propose an Amendment?, 13(2) Yale Journal of International Law 268 (1988).
10. Sayapin S. Raphael Lemkin: A Tribute, 20(4) European Journal of International Law 1157 (2009).
11. Schabas W.A. Genocide in International Law: The Crime of Crimes (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).
12. Schabas W.A. Groups Protected by the Genocide Convention: Conflicting Interpretations from the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, 6(2) ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 375 (2000).
13. Shaw M. Genocide and International Relations: Changing Patterns in the Transitions of the Late Modern World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
14. Verdirame G. The Genocide Definition in the Jurisprudence of the Ad Hoc Tribunal, 49(3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 578 (2000).
For citation: Gagro S.F. Protection of “Exclusive” Groups Only – An Essential Element of Genocide. Russian Law Journal. 2018;6(3):100-124. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2018-6-3-100-124
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.