Are Non-trade Values Adequately Protected under GATT Art. XX?
Abstract
About the Author
Natalya MosunovaRussian Federation
Head of Legal Department, Adecco Group Russia (2/3 Paveletskaya sq., Moscow, 115054, Russia)
References
1. Ala’i, Padideh. AHuman Rights Critique of the WTO: Some Preliminary, Observations, 33 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 537 (2001).
2. Bossche, Peter van den, & Zdouc, Werner. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization 546, 551–53, 557, 560–61, 563, 569, 571, 573 (3rd ed., Cambridge University Press 2013).
3. Eres, Tatjana. The Limits of GATT Article XX: A Back Door for Human Rights?, 35(3) Geo. J. Int’l L. 597 (2004).
4. Regan, Donald H. The Meaning of ‘Necessary,’ in GATT Article XX and GATS Article XIV: The Myth of Cost-Benefit Balancing, 6(3) World Trade Rev. 347 (2007).
5. Report by Secretariat, Trade Policy Review: Bangladesh, WT/TPR/S/270, 10 September 2012, Appendix, Table AIII.1, at <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp370_e.htm> (accessed June 17, 2014).
6. Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to the World Trade Organization, 1 November 2005, Annex F, List of Banned Imports, at <https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S006.aspx?Query=(%20@Symbol=%20wt/acc/sau/*)&Language=ENGLISH&Context=FomerScriptedSearch&languageUIChanged=true#> (accessed June 17, 2014).
7. Tamiotti, Ludivine. The Legal Interface between Carbon Border Measures and Trade Rule, 11(5) Climate Policy 1202–11 (2011), available at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2011.592672> (accessed June 17, 2014).
8. Trujillo, Elizabeth. A Dialogical Approach to Trade and Environment, 16(3) J. Int’l Econ. L. 535, 538 (2013).
For citation:
Mosunova N. Are Non-trade Values Adequately Protected under GATT Art. XX? Russian Law Journal. 2014;2(2):101-113. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2014-2-2-101-113