QUARTER OF A CENTURY ON FROM THE SOVIET ERA: REFLECTIONS ON RUSSIAN DOCTRINAL RESPONSES TO THE ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA


https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-3-86-112

Full Text:


Abstract

The article is intended to give a reader a broader view of the post-Crimean academic discussion within Russia. The justifications offered by Russia for its actions in Crimea in 2014 were met with scepticism by the international community and international lawyers across various jurisdictions. Among Russian international legal scholars there were almost no critical voices willing to assess Crimea’s annexation as at least questionable under international law. Rather, these scholars, in their overwhelming majority, spoke or wrote on the matter in feverish defence of Russia’s actions. Some international scholars who study “Russian” approaches to international law or come across them aspart of their research seem prepared to justify the striking unity of perspective among Russian academic international lawyers by reference to the historically authoritarian nature of the Russian state. This article counters arguments of such would-be deference, suggesting that Russian academia be looked at by reference to the emerging standard of international legal profession.


About the Author

MARIA ISSAEVA
Threefold Legal Advisors LLC
Russian Federation

Managing Partner, Threefold Legal Advisors LLC

4 Ilyinka St., Moscow, 109012, Russia

 



References

1. Вельяминов Г.М. и др. Круглый стол на тему: «Международно-правовые аспекты присоединения Крыма к России», Дипломатическая академия МИД России, Москва, 10 апреля 2014 г. [Georgy M. Velyaminov et al., Round Table: International Legal Aspects of Integration of Crimea in Russia, Diplomatic Academy of the Foreign Ministry of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 10 April 2014] (Jun. 20, 2017), available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4k620BZKyto.

2. Задорожний А.В. Российская доктрина международного права после аннексии Крыма [Alexander V. Zadorozhniy, The Russian International Legal Doctrine after the Annexation of Crimea] (Kyiv: K.I.S., 2015).

3. Зорькин В.Д. Право – и только право. О вопиющих нарушениях, которые упорно не замечают, Российская газета, 23 марта 2015 г., № 6631(60) [Valery D. Zorkin, Law – and Only Law. On Egregious Violations That Go Unnoticed, Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 23 March 2015, No. 6631(60)] (Jun. 20, 2017), available at http://www.rg.ru/2015/03/23/zorkin-site.html.

4. Grant T.D. Aggression against Ukraine: Territory, Responsibility and International Law (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015).

5. Kapustin A. Crimea’s Self-Determination in the Light of Contemporary International Law, 75(1) Heidelberg Journal of International Law 101 (2015).

6. Mälksoo L. Russian Approaches to International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).

7. Salenko A. Legal Aspects of the Dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, 75(1) Heidelberg Journal of International Law 141 (2015).

8. Tolstykh V. Three Ideas of Self-Determination in International Law and the Reunification of Crimea with Russia, 75(1) Heidelberg Journal of International Law 119 (2015).


Supplementary files

For citation: ISSAEVA M. QUARTER OF A CENTURY ON FROM THE SOVIET ERA: REFLECTIONS ON RUSSIAN DOCTRINAL RESPONSES TO THE ANNEXATION OF CRIMEA. Russian Law Journal. 2017;5(3):86-112. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-3-86-112

Views: 589

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)