The Development of Russian Legislation Relating to the Protection of the Rights of Separated Parents and Their Children
The following article deals with the challenges created by legal regulations concerning divorced or separated couples and focuses on the rights of separated parents with children. The article analyzes the problems associated with law enforcement practices in this area, the gaps in existing family law, as well as the disputed aspects of theory concerning parents’ legal relations. Suggestions for legislative developments in Russia concerning the protection of family rights within separated families are given. The authors of this paper argue for a rethink of existing approaches to legal regulations in this field of law due to the fact that existing family legislation does not take into consideration many of the challenges and realities of modern parenthood. Furthermore, current legal regulations in Russia do not fully correspond to international legal norms. The authors contend that this will lead to the curtailment of the legal rights of the separated parents. Such status is characterized, on the one hand, by unreasonable restrictions on parental rights. On the other hand, it permits only a limited degree of responsibility for a child’s upbringing and financial support on the part of a parent living separately from their child. The authors propose that, in this respect, it is necessary to rethink disputed legal decisions relating to family law and the implementation of family law in practice. By analyzing such implementation, the authors single out a number of interrelated factors that must be overcome in order to effectively protect separated parents’ relationships with their children. The aim of the article is to initiate a new approach to parental legal relations after divorce or separation and to propose new legislative regulations concerning the legal status of a parent who lives separately from their child. New developments in family law are proposed in order to ensure a balance between parental responsibilities and rights as well as the rights of the child.
About the AuthorsTatiana Krasnova
Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Civil Procedure
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625003
Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages and Intercultural Professional Communication for Law and Economics
38 Lenina St., Tyumen, 625003
1. Ильина О.Ю. Проблемы интереса в семейном праве Российской Федерации [Olga Yu. Ilyina, Problems of Interest in Family Law of the Russian Federation] (Moscow: Gorodets, 2007).
2. Brumariu L.E. & Kerns K.A. Mother-Child Emotion Communication and Childhood Anxiety Symptoms, 29(3) Cognition & Emotion (2015).
3. Donisch K. et al. Child Welfare, Juvenile Justice, Mental Health, and Education Providers’ Conceptualizations of Trauma-Informed Practice, 21(2) Child Maltreatment (2016).
4. Englund T. et al. Education as a Human and a Citizenship Right – Parents’ Rights Children’s Rights, or…? The Necessity of Historical Contextualization, 8(2) Journal of Human Rights (2009).
5. Goldstein J.A. et al. Beyond the Best Interests of the Child (London: Burnett Books, 1980).
6. Hsu J. Marital Therapy for Intercultural Couples in Culture and Psychotherapy: A Guide to Clinical Practice (W.S. Tseng & J. Streltzer (eds.), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press Inc., 2001).
7. Huijsmans R. Reconceptualizing Children’s Rights in International Development: Living Rights, Social Justice, Translations, 13(2) Children’s Geographies (2015).
8. Keller T. The Meaning of Marriage: Facing the Complexities of Commitment with the Wisdom of God (New York: Dutton, 2011).
9. Kerns S.E.U. et al. Development and Implementation of a Child Welfare Workforce Strategy to Build a Trauma-Informed System of Support for Foster Care, 21(2) Child Maltreatment (2016).
10. Lansdown G. Civil Rights of Children in the Family, 4(2) Child Care in Practice (1997).
11. Maleshin D. The Russian Style of Civil Procedure, 21(2) Emory International Law Review (2007) (Apr. 20, 2017), also available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract_id=2208488.
12. Morrison S. In Care, Aftercare and Caring for Those in Care: My Successful Care Journey, 22(2) Child Care in Practice (2016).
13. Oetzel J.G. et al. Managing Communication Tensions and Challenges during the End-of-Life Journey: Perspectives of Māori Kaumātua and Their Whānau, 30(4) Health Communication (2015).
14. Summers A. et al. Terminating Parental Rights: The Relationship of Judicial Experience and Expectancy-Related Factors to Risk Perceptions in Child Protection Cases, 18(1) Psychology, Crime and Law (2012).
15. Tarusina N. European Experience and National Traditions in Russian Family Law, 2(3) Russian Law Journal (2015).
16. Trinder L. Competing Constructions of Childhood: Children’s Rights and Children’s Wishes in Divorce, 19(3) Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law (1997).
17. Welbourne P. & Dixon J. Child Protection and Welfare: Cultures, Policies, and Practices, 19(6) European Journal of Social Work (2016).
18. Weston R. & Harrison M. “Divorced Parents” Understanding of Their Rights and Responsibilities towards Their Children, Paper delivered at the Third Australian Family Research Conference, hosted by the Australian Institute of Family Studies, held at Ballarat College of Advanced Education, 26–29 November 1989.
For citation: Krasnova T., Pluzhnik I. The Development of Russian Legislation Relating to the Protection of the Rights of Separated Parents and Their Children. Russian Law Journal. 2017;5(2):95-112. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-2-95-112
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.