Collective Labor Disputes and Strikes in Russia: The Impact of Judicial Precedents and Enforcement


https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-1-5-32

Full Text:


Abstract

The right to strike is recognized in the Constitution and the Labor Code of the Russian Federation as a means to resolve collective labor disputes. However, in Russia labor protests come up for discussion much more frequently than strikes. In recent years the number of labor protests in Russia, including various forms of work stoppage, has increased significantly compared to previous years, but the number of legally constituted collective labor disputes and strikes has remained very low. The legislation on resolution of collective labor disputes and mounting strikes is quite restrictive in Russia, and its enforcement also encourages employees to seek alternative ways to settle collective labor conflicts. There is little empirical research on the judicial implementation of these norms and its influence on the enforcement of legislation. Therefore, this paper analyses the reasoning of courts in cases on the legality of strikes, their interpretations of the law, and the impact these decisions have on the enforcement of the legislation on resolution of collective labor disputes and strikes. Our conclusion is that the courts act as another restrictive influence on the resolution of collective labor disputes and the exercise of the right to strike in Russia.


About the Author

Elena Gerasimova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law, Faculty of Law 

3 Bol’shoy Trekhsvyatitel’skiy pereulok, Moscow, 109028



References

1. Герасимова Е.С. Забастовка как средство защиты трудовых прав граждан, 3 Право и экономика 1999 [Gerasimova E.S. The Strike as a Means to Defend the Labor Rights of Citizens, 3 Law and Economics (1999)].

2. Лютов Н.Л. Признание права на забастовку на уровне Международной орга- низации труда: важно ли это для России и других стран?, 9 Актуальные проблемы российского права (2015) [Lyutov N.L. Acknowledging the Right to Strike at the Level of the International Labor Organisation: Is It Important for Russia and Other Countries?, 9 Urgent Problems in Russian Law (2015)].

3. Нуртдинова А.Ф. Прекращение работы в связи с невыплатой заработной платы: попытка правового анализа, 8 Журнал российского права (2000) [Nurtdinova A.F. Work Stoppages Caused by Unpaid Wages: A Preliminary Legal Analysis, 8 Russian Law Journal (2000)].

4. Garaway Т. Freedom of Association: Battering Ram or Trojan Horse?, 13(2) Review of International Political Economy (2006).

5. Gerasimova E. The Resolution of Collective Labour Disputes and the Realization of the Right to Strike in Russia in Labour Law in Russia: Recent Developments and New Challenges. Iss. 6 (M. Tiraboschi et al. (eds.), Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014).

6. Hofmann C. (The Right to) Strike and the International Labour Organization: Is the System for Monitoring Labour and Social Standards in Trouble?, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (2014) (Nov. 2, 2016), available at http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/10775.pdf.

7. Laws Against Strikes: The South African Experience in an International and Comparative Perspective (B.A. Hepple at al. (eds.), Milano: Franco Angeli, 2015).

8. Lyutov N. The Right to Strike: Russian Federation in The Right to Strike: A Comparative Overview (B. Waas (ed.), Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014).

9. Xhafa E. The Right to Strike Struck Down?, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (2016) (Nov. 4, 2017), available at http://www.fes.de/cgi-bin/gbv.cgi?id=12827&ty=pdf.


Supplementary files

For citation: Gerasimova E. Collective Labor Disputes and Strikes in Russia: The Impact of Judicial Precedents and Enforcement. Russian Law Journal. 2017;5(2):5-32. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2017-5-1-5-32

Views: 846

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)