Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Russian Law on Discrimination in Employment: Can it be Compatible with International Labor Standards?

Full Text:


Law concerning discrimination in employment in Russia was expected to undergo a serious transformation after the fall of the Soviet system, when the Iron Curtain was lifted and the country became more open to Western legal concepts and international law. Nevertheless, most existing anti-discrimination norms in Russian law are based on the traditional concept of “uniformity and differentiation in regulation of labor” that is ill-suited to meet the challenges of amarket economy and the emergence of employment by privately owned enterprises which may have greater motivation to discriminate than state-owned-enterprises. The aim of the author is not to present an encyclopedic overview of all aspects of the topic of discrimination, but rather to concentrate on the most significant areas in which Russian law and practices diverge from international labor standards. To do so, this article analyzes current Russian legislation and landmark cases concerning gender, disability, age and some other areas of discrimination in employment with respect to their effectiveness and conformity to international labor standards on the matter. The issues of a clear definition of discrimination in employment, of protection from indirect discrimination, and of alleviation from the burden of proof are also examined. The author concludes this work by offering the reader several suggestions about how to harmonize Russian domestic law on employment discrimination with international labor standards while giving due respect to national legal and societal traditions and the current economic environment.

About the Author

Nikita Lyutov
Kutafin Moscow State Law University; National Research University – Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Head of Department of Labor Law and Social Security Law;

Associate Professor, 9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya street, 125993, Moscow


1. Blanpain R. and Świątkowski A. M. (eds), The Laval and Viking Cases: Freedom of Services and Establishment v. Industrial Conflicts in the European Union 1 ff (Wolters Kluwer, Austin, Boston et al., 2009).

2. Bruno S., Alston Ph. The Sources of Human Rights Law: Custom, Jus Cogens and General Principles, 17 Australian Yearbook of Int’l L. 82–108 (1992).

3. García-Muňoz A. A., Beryl ter H., Attila K. Soft on the Inside, Hard on the Outside: An Analysis of the Legal Nature of New Forms of International Labour Law, 27(4) The Int’l J. of Comp. Lab. L. & Indus. Rel. 337–363 (2011).

4. Greene D. W. Categorically Black, White, or Wrong: Misperception Discrimination and the State of Title VII Protection, 47(1) U. of Michigan J. of L. Reform 87–166 (2013).

5. Gregory P. R., Kohlhase, Janet E. The Earnings of Soviet Workers: Evidence from The Soviet Interview Project, 70(1) Rev. of Econ. & Stat. 23–35 (1988).

6. Kahn-Freund O. On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law, 37 The Mod. L. Rev. 1–27 (1974);

7. Katz K. Gender, Wages and Discrimination in the USSR: AStudy of a Russian Industrial Town, 21(4) Cambridge J. of Econ. 431–452 (1997).

8. Kirgis F.L. Custom on a Sliding Scale, 81 Am. J. of Int’l L. 146 (1987).

9. O’Keefe R. Customary International Crimes in English Courts, 72 Brit. Yearbook of Int’l L. 293 (2001).

10. Palmer F. Re-dressing the Balance of Power in Discrimination Cases: the Shift in the Burden of Proof, 4 Eur. Anti-Discrimination L. Rev. 24 (2006).

11. Royle T. The ILO’s Shift to Promotional Principles and the ‘Privatization’ of Labour Rights: An Analysis of Labour Standards, Voluntary Self-Regulation and Social Clauses, 26(3) The Int’l J. of Comp. Lab. L. and Indus. Rel. 249–271 (2010).

12. Smith T. Everyday Indignities: Race, Retaliation and the Promise of Title VII, 34(3) Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 531–574 (2003).

13. Pierre-Hugues V. International Law in National Legal Systems: An Empirical Investigation, 109 Am. J. of Int’l L. 514–533 (2015).

14. Warbrick C. McGoldrick D., International Law in English Courts: Recent Cases, 52(3) Int’l and Comp. L. Q. 815–824 (2003).

15. Weiss M. International Labour Standards: aComplex Public-Private Policy Mix, 29(1) The Int’l J. of Comp. Lab. L. and Ind’l Rel. 7–20 (2013).

For citation:

Lyutov N. Russian Law on Discrimination in Employment: Can it be Compatible with International Labor Standards? Russian Law Journal. 2016;4(3):7-50.

Views: 3895

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)