Which Way is The Russian Double-headed Eagle Looking?
The article examines the historical reasons for the unique relationship between the state and the law in Russia, which has a system-forming impact on all aspects of life in modern Russia. The authors analyze the duality of the Russian political and legal world – ‘Athens’ vs ‘Jerusalem’ – ‘East vs West’ – ‘legal state vs state of obligation’ – and reveal the philosophical and ethical maxims through which it became possible to talk about Russia’s peculiar historical path and the modern image of Russia. In the latter case, the authors focus particular attention on the phenomenon of ‘sobornost’ [‘the spiritual community of many people living in the same space’] establishing that, in the philosophy of the Slavophiles, this category played the role of both a religious and a national proto-symbol, which can be understood as a source of spiritual unity of the people, connecting them from the outset during the sacrament of communal prayer and then being transferred to everyday life, organizing and directing all social practices of the Orthodox society in a special way. It is pointed out that the philosophical reflection on Russia’s peculiar historical path has found a certain continuation in the idea of the ‘Slavic legal family’ proposed by Professor V.N. Sinyukov. The authors do not overlook the problems of legal nihilism as an attribute of the Russian political and legal practice. The instinctive distrust of complexity and inclination towards the utmost simplicity in solving social problems is named as one of the reasons for the legal nihilism of the Russian people. In the final section, the authors address the issue of borrowing the political and legal experience from foreign sources. The ‘pole points’ of the analysis are the Eastern experience of the Chinese state and the Western experience of French law. Expansion of the Anglo-American law is defined by the authors as the ‘other kind of milk’ for the ‘Russian coffee’ – which generally corresponds to the global trend in this sphere.
About the AuthorsVladimir Przhilenskiy
Professor of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street, Moscow, 123286, Russia
Kutafin Moscow State Law University, Associate Member of the International Academy of Comparative Law (9 Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya Street, Moscow, 123286, Russia
1. A History of Russian Thought 95-96 (Ed. by William Leatherbarrow and Derek Offord, Cambridge University Press 2010).
2. Bassin, M.A., Glebov, S.B., Laruelle, M. Between Europe and Asia: The origins, theories, and legacies of Russian eurasianism (University of Pittsburgh Press 2015).
3. Berdyaev Nikolai, The Origin of Russian Communism 87 (Robert MacLehose and Company Ltd The University Press) (London 1948).
4. Florovsky Georges, Sobornost: the Catholicity of the Church, The Church of God. An Anglo-Russian Symposium by Members of the Fellowship of St Alban and St Sergius 55 (ed. E.L. Mascall, (London 1934).
5. François Gény, Méthode d interprétation et source en droit privé positif (Paris 1899).
6. Hendley, K. Who are the legal nihilists in Russia? 28(2) Post-Soviet Affairs 149–186 (2012) <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2747/1060-586X.28.2.149>.
7. McDaniel Tim, The Agony of the Russian Idea 72 (Princeton University Press 1996).
8. Piama P. Gaidenko, Philosophie russe et pensée européenne: le cas de Vladimir S. S oloviev, 2(222) Diogène (2008). DOI: 10.3917/dio.222.0032 <http://www.cairn.info/revue-diogene-2008-2-page-32.htm>.
9. Rozhenshield Gary, Western Law, Russian Justice. Dostoevsky, the Jury Trail and the Low. 7–8 (University Wisconsin Press, Madison 2005).
10. Shestov Lev, Athens and Jerusalem 386 (Ohio University Press ed., Athens 1966).
11. Sigel Fyodor, Lectures on Slavonic Law (London 1902).
12. Zweerde Evert Van Der, La place de la philosophie russe dans l’histoire philosophique mondiale, 3(223) Diogène (2008). DOI: 10.3917/dio.223.0115 < http://www.cairn.info/revue-diogene-2008-3-page-115.htm>.
13. Аверинцев С.С. Поэтика ранневизантийской литературы [Averintsev S.S. Poetika rannevizantiyskoy literatury [S.S. Averintsev, Poetics of the Early Byzantine literature]] (Coda, Moscow 1997).
14. Алексеев Н.Н. Русский народ и государство [Alekseyev N.N. Russkiy narod i gosudarstvo [N.N. Alekseyev, The Russian People and the State]] 293–295 (Moscow 1998).
15. Байниязов P.C. Правосознание и российский правовой менталитет // Правоведение. 2000. № 2. С. 31–40 [Bayniyazov R.S. Pravosoznaniye i rossiyskiy pravovoy mentalitet // Pravovedenie. 2000. No. 2. S. 31–40 [R.S. Bayniyazov, Legal Consciousness and the Russian Legal Mentality, 2 Pravovedenie 31–40 (2000)]].
16. Бердяев Н.А. Философия свободы [Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody [N.A. Berdyaev, Philosophy of Freedom]] 313 (Folio, AST, Moscow 2004).
17. Вернадский Г.В. Монголы и Русь [Vernadsky G.V. Mongoly i Rus [G.V. Vernadsky, The Mongols and the Rus]] 251 (Lomonosov, Moscow 2015).
18. Доступное объяснение Мо-цзы [Dosruonoye obysnenie Mo-chzu [Understandable Explanation of Mozi]] 28 (Beijing 1956).
19. Евразийская хроника. Вып. VII [Evraziyskaya khronika. Vol. VII [7 Eurasian Chronicle]] 43 (Paris 1926–1928).
For citation: Przhilenskiy V., Zakharova M. Which Way is The Russian Double-headed Eagle Looking?. Russian Law Journal. 2016;4(2):6-25. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2016-4-2-6-25
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0.