Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Historical Comparison of Sovereignty in International Law

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-128-157

Full Text:

Abstract

The current article aims to study on the concept of sovereignty in international law. To this end, sovereignty is historically examined and compared in different legal doctrines. In fact, there is a verity of legal theories on the formulation and conceptualization of sovereignty. The dominant perspective of the contemporary legal doctrines sees sovereignty as wornout and outdated concept which belongs to classical legal doctrines. This article argues such accounts and shows how the concept of sovereignty survived through historically legal developments and has still been influential in the sphere of international law. Although the main legal events comprising Westphalian truce, world wars, the foundation of United Nation organization and so on have changed the nature and content of sovereignty in the history of international law, it has remained as a fundamental principle of international law. The lack of correct understanding of this concept can reinforce the obstacles for legal modeling and doctrines. So, through such a historical comparison, the research elaborates the reconceptualization process in the concept of sovereignty and elucidates how sovereignty means in the contemporary international law and how this concept defined by the modern legal doctrine influences international law and globally affects the legal order among states. Discussing the different legal doctrines on the concept of sovereignty in different historical periods, the article reveals the present considerations on sovereignty in contemporary international law.

About the Author

Louise Kazemi Shariat Panahi
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Louise Kazemi Shariat Panahi  – Postgraduate Student, International Law Department, Law Institute

6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198



References

1. Anghie A. The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities, 27(5) Third World Q. 739 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590600780011

2. Arendt H. ‘The Rights of Man’: What Are They?, 3(1) Modern Rev. 24 (1949).

3. Austin J. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (Wilfrid E. Rumble ed., 1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805115215

4. Benvenisti E. The Paradoxes of Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: Concluding Remarks, 16(2) Theor. Inq. L. 535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2015-111

5. Besson S. Sovereignty in IX Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law 366 (2011).

6. Bodin J. Six Books of the Commonwealth (M.J. Tooley trans., 1967).

7. Bynkershoek С. van. On Questions of Public Law (Tenney Frank trans., 1930).

8. Davis L. The Law Among Nations (2012).

9. De Vattel E. The Law of Nations: Or, Principles of the Law of Nature Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Joseph Chitty trans., 6th ed. 1844).

10. Dobârceanu N.-R. & Voicescu V.A. Sovereignty and Integration in Modern Era Perspectives, 2(4) L. Rev. 1 (2020).

11. Duguit L. Law in the Modern State (Frida & Harold J. Laski trans., 1921).

12. Dyzenhaus D. Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of Sovereignty Thought, 16(2) Theor. Inq. L. 338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/til-2015-104

13. Fassbender B. International Constitutional Law: Written or Unwritten?, 15(3) Chin. J. Int’l L. 489 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmw032

14. Fassbender B. Sovereignty and Constitutionalism in International Law in Sovereignty in Transition 115 (Neil Walker ed., 2003). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472562883.ch-005

15. Ferreira-Snyman M.P. The Evaluation of State Sovereignty: A Historical Overview, 12(2) Fundamina 1 (2006).

16. Fiore P. International Law Codification and its Legal Section or the Legal Organization of the Society of States (Edwin M. Borchard trans., 2013).

17. Grotius H. On the Laws of War and Peace (Archibald С. Campbell trans., 2001). Hegel G.W.F. Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences (William Wallace trans., 3rd ed. 1830).

18. Helfman T. Neutrality, the Law of Nations, and the Natural Law Tradition: A Study of the Seven Years’ War, 30(2) Yale J. Int’l L. 549 (2005).

19. Heller H. Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law (David Dyzenhaus ed., 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810544.001.0001

20. Hobbes T. Leviathan: The Matter, Form, and Power of aCommonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civil (1999).

21. Huber M. II Reports of International Arbitral Awards – Recueil Des Sentences Arbitrales: Island of Palmas case (Netherlands, USA) 829 (2006).

22. Hunter C.O. The Submission of the Sovereign: An Examination of the Compatibility of Sovereignty and International Law, 4(5) Denver J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 521 (2016).

23. Jellinek G. Allgemeine Staatslehre (3rd ed. 1914).

24. Joyner D.H. & Roscini M. Is There Any Room for the Doctrine of Fundamental Rights of States in Today’s International Law?, 4(3) Cambridge J. Int’l & Comp. L. 467 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7574/cjicl.04.03.467

25. Joyner D.H. Iran’s Nuclear Program and International Law: From Confrontation to Accord (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199377893.001.0001

26. Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Mary Gregor trans. & ed., 1998).

27. Kelsen H. Principles of International Law (2003).

28. Kelsen H. Sovereignty (Stanley L. Paulson & Bonnie Litschewski Paulson ed., 1998).

29. Klabbers J. International Law (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139022569

30. Krasner S.D. Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States, 29(2) Int. Secur. 85 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1162/0162288042879940

31. Lara R. The Problem of Sovereignty, International Law, and Intellectual Conscience, 5(1) J. Philos. Int’l L. 1 (2014).

32. Livingston P.M. Agamben, Badiou, and Russell, 42(3) Cont. Philos. Rev. 297 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-009-9112-2

33. Locke J. Two Treatises of Government in History of Economic Thought Books 1 (Rod Hay ed., 2004).

34. Malanczuk P. Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law (7th ed. 1997). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203427712

35. Nietzche F.W. The Gay Science (Josefine Nauckhoff trans. & Bernard Williams ed., 2001).

36. Petersmann E.-U. How to Constitutionalize International Law and Foreign Policy for the Benefit of Civil Society?, 20(1) Mich. J. Int’l L. 1 (1998).

37. Prutsch M.J. Monarchical Sovereignty and the Legacy of the Revolution: Constitutionalism in Post-Napoleonic Germany, 15 Historia Constitucional 177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.17811/hc.v0i16.437

38. Rombach J.H. Cornelius van Bynkershoek, 13(152) Int’l Rev. Red Cross 567 (1973).

39. Rousseau J.-J. The Social Contract (G.D.H. Cole trans., 1923).

40. Schmitt С. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (1928).

41. Schmitt С. Verfassungslehre (1985).

42. Shaw N.M. International Law (6th ed. 2008).

43. Shen J. The Basis of International Law: Why Nations Observe, 17(2) Penn State Int’l L. Rev. 287 (1999).

44. Summers R.S. Professor H.L.A. Hart’s Concept of Law, 1963(4) Duke L.J. 629 (1963). https://doi.org/10.2307/1371248

45. Tunkin G.I. The Contemporary Soviet Theory of International Law, 31(1) Curr. Leg. Probl. 177 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/31.1.177

46. Tunkin G.I. The Problem of Sovereignty and Organisation of European Security, 1 Revue de Droit International 1 (1974).

47. Volk С. The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times, L., Cult. Humanit. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872119828010


Review

For citation:


Panahi L. Historical Comparison of Sovereignty in International Law. Russian Law Journal. 2021;9(4):128-157. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-128-157

Views: 241


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)