Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

Foundations of Ecocentric Law

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-72-98

Full Text:

Abstract

This scientific article discusses the reaosns for inefficiency (“impotence”) of modern environmental law as a normative reaction to the “destruction of Nature.” The scope of the destruction of Nature has been broadening. The environmental protection law has thus not influenced the resurrection of “destroyed Nature.” The essential reasons for the current excessiveness (intemperance) of man’s interaction with Nature (the reasons for the “destruction of Nature”) and/or reasons for the inefficiency of the modern environmental law should be sought for in the dominant anthropocentric cultural paradigm of the western cultures oriented towards an un-limited material progress. If anthropocentrism (exploitativeness) as the basis of human utilitarian interaction with nature has led to the “destruction of nature,” there is no doubt that the ecological reason remaining within the anthropocentric construction of Nature can not lead to its “resurrection.” Only the setting-up of the ecocentric construction of Nature may lead to the “resurrection” of Nature. This orientation must be followed by the nomos of the western cultures. A new law of nature on the basis of the new, ecocentric ontology and ethics is therefore necessary. This article thus alalyzes the foundations of new ecocentric legal philospohy. This approach is original at the global level and is important at both the theoretical and applied levels. The new ecocentric legal philosophy should become the foundation of modern environmental law. Keywords: inefficiency of modern environmental law.

About the Author

Senko Pličanič
University of Ljubljana
Slovenia

Senko Pličanič – Associate Professor, Faculty of Law

Poljanski nasip 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana



References

1. Breuer R. Umweltschutz in Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht 601 (Ingo von Münch ed., 1988). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112329122-009

2. Breyer S.G. Regulation and Its Reform (1982). https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028760

3. Brooks R.O. Coercion to Environmental Virtue: Can and Should Law Mandate Environmentally Sensitive Lifestyles?, 31(1) Am. J. Jurisprud. 21 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/31.1.21

4. Buck S.J. Understanding Environmental Law and Administration (1996).

5. Bugarič B. From Plan to Market – One Way or Alternative Paths? (A Critique of Institutional Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe), doctoral dissertation (1997).

6. Damaška M.R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (1986).

7. De Lucia V. Towards an Ecological Philosophy of Law: A Comparative Discussion, 4(2) J. Hum. Rts. Env’t 167 (2013).

8. De Vido S. A Quest for an Eco-centric Approach to International Law: The COVID19 Pandemic as Game Changer, 3(2) Jus Cogens 105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00031-0

9. Dryzek J.S. The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (1997). https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199696000.001.0001

10. Earthly Goods: Environmental Change and Social Justice (Fen Osler Hampson & Judith Reppy eds., 1996). https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501725500

11. Eder K. The Social Construction of Nature: A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment (1996).

12. Edley C.F. Administrative Law: Rethinking Judicial Control of Bureaucracy (1990).

13. Environmental Liability and Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe (Gretta Goldenman et al. eds., 1993).

14. Environmental Planning and Sustainability (Susan Buckingham-Hatfield & Bob Evans eds., 1996).

15. Findley R.W. & Farber D.A. Environmental Law (1992).

16. Fletcher G.P. Basic Concepts of Legal Thought (1996).

17. Forbes J.D. Columbus and Other Cannibals: The Wetiko Disease of Exploitation, Imperialism and Terrorism (1992).

18. Foundations of Environmental Law and Policy (Richard L. Revesz ed., 1997).

19. Guha R. & Martinez Alier J. Varieties of Environmentalism: Essays North and South (1997). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315070766

20. Hardin G. The Tragedy of the Commons, 162(3859) Science 1243 (1968).

21. Hart H.L.A. Koncept prava [The Concept of Law] (1994).

22. Holterman T. & van Maarseveen H. Law and Anarchism (1984).

23. Johnston R.J. Nature, State and Economy: A Political Economy of the Environment (1996).

24. Kapra F. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems (1996).

25. Kaufmann A. Uvod v filozofijo prava [Introduction to Philosophy of Law] (1994).

26. Kelley D.R. The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition (1990). https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674181984

27. Kirn A. Ekološka (okoljska) etika [Environmental Ethics] (1992).

28. Kiss A. & Shelton D. Manual of European Environmental Law (1995). Kloepfer M. Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz, 77. Lfg. (1996).

29. Kloepfer M. Umweltrecht (1989). https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406747175

30. Kuhn T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962).

31. Law and the Environment: AMultidisciplinary Reader (Robert V. Percival & Dorothy С. Alevizatos eds., 1997).

32. Lersner H. von. Verfahrensvorschläge für umweltrechtliche Grenzwerte, 12 Natur und Recht 193 (1990).

33. Lévi-Strauss С. Oddaljeni pogled [The View from Afar] (1985).

34. McCormick J. The Global Environmental Movement (1995).

35. Merchant С. The Death of Nature (1980).

36. National Environmental Policies: A Comparative Study of Capacity-Building (Martin Jänicke & Helmut Weidner eds., 1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60507-9

37. Natural Resources Policy and Law: Trends and Directions (Lawrence J. MacDonnell & Sarah F. Bates eds., 1993).

38. Ortolano L. Environmental Regulation and Impact Assessment (1997).

39. Palmer D. Looking at Philosophy: The Unbearable Heaviness of Philosophy Made Lighter (1994).

40. Philosophy and the Natural Environment (Robin Attfield & Andrew Belsey eds., 1994).

41. Ponting С. AGreen History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations (1993).

42. Posner R. The Problems of Jurisprudence (1990).

43. Przeworski A. Sustainable Democracy (1995).

44. Rose-Ackerman S. Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States (1995).

45. Sagoff M. The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment (1996).

46. Sax J.L. The Search for Environmental Rights, 6(1) J. Land Use & Env’t L. 93 (1990).

47. Schoenbaum T.J. & Rosenberg R.H. Environmental Policy Law: Problems, Cases, and Readings (1991).

48. Sinha S. Jurisprudence (Legal Philosophy) in a Nutshell (2006).

49. Solomon R.С. & Higgins K.M. A Short History of Philosophy (1996).

50. Stone C.D. Should Trees Have Standing? – Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, 45(2) South. Calif. L. Rev. 450 (1972).

51. Stone C.D. The Environment in Moral Thought, 56(1) Tenn. L. Rev. 1 (1988).

52. Tarlock A.D. Earth and Other Ethics: The Institutional Issues, 56(1) Tenn. L. Rev. 43 (1988).

53. The Ecological Community (Roger S. Gottlieb ed., 1997).

54. The Politics of Sustainable Development (Susan Baker et al. eds., 1997). https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203992098

55. Toulmin S. The Case for Cosmic Prudence, 56(1) Tenn. L. Rev. 29 (1988).

56. Umweltgesetzbuch (UGB-KomE): Entwurf der Unabhängigen Sachverständigenkommission zum Umweltgesetzbuch beim Bundesministerium für Umwelt (1998).

57. Unger R.M. Democratic Experimentalism: The Programmatic Path to the Left Now: An Argument and a Manifesto (1997).

58. Wicke L. & Blenk L. Umweltoekonomie und Umweltpolitik (1991).

59. Zimmerman M.E. Contesting Earth’s Future: Radical Ecology and Postmodernity (1994). https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520919228


Review

For citation:


Pličanič S. Foundations of Ecocentric Law. Russian Law Journal. 2021;9(4):72-98. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2021-9-4-72-98

Views: 175


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)