Reception of the Russian Statute of Civil Procedure of 1864 in Lithuania during 1918–40

The authors of this article examine historical reasons underlying the enactment of the Statute on Civil Procedure of Russia of 1864 in Lithuania after the declaration of independence in 1918. The Statute of 1864 became effective in 1883, when Lithuania was still part of Russian Empire. In 1918 Lithuania declared independence, but due to the fundamentally changed economic and social living conditions of the society it was impossible to restore the validity of the Third Lithuanian Statute of 1588, which was valid until 1840. It was therefore a logical step to receive the legal acts which were valid until August 1, 1914, including the Statute of 1864. The receipt of the Statute of 1864 is also justified by the fact that the Statute was a modern legal act and borrowed many progressive ideas from the civil procedure law of Western countries, especially from France. The authors, based on historical sources, also examine the problems of the interpretation and applications of the Statute of 1864 by the Lithuanian courts during 1918–40. Such problems were related to the new organization of the court system in Lithuania, lack of qualified lawyers, translation of the Statute from Russian language to Lithuanian language, lack of Lithuanian doctrine of law in the area of civil procedure, disagreement regarding the possibility of the application of the former case law of Russian courts, especially Russian Senate, etc. Nevertheless, the Statute has been successfully applied until the 1940 and it was one of the reason that the Lithuanian Code of Civil Procedure was not adopted until 1940. The Statute of 1864 was again rediscovered after 1990, when the restoration of Lithuanian independence was made, and important changes in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1964 were introduced. The Statute of 1864 was also analyzed during the preparation of the new Code of Civil Procedure of Lithuania of 2002.

case law, civil procedure, codification, Code of Civil Procedure, highest tribunal, precedent, reception of law, Russian laws, sources of civil procedure,

1. Andriulis, Vytautas, et al. Lietuvos teisės istorija 312 (Justitia 2002).

2. Andriulis, Vytautas. Teisės vystymo Lietuvoje XIX a. klausimu, 11 Teisė 34 (1972).

3. Apygardų teismams, taikos teisėjams, teismo tardytojams, valstybės gynėjams ir notarams, 1919(5) Laikinosios Vyriausybės Žinios.

4. Civilinės teisenos įstatymas (Česlovas Butkys, ed.) (Gutmano Knygynas 1938).

5. Civilinio proceso įstatymas (Jurgis Viskanta, trans., Vladas Mačys & Simonas Bieliackinas, eds.) ‘Literatūros’ Knygynas 1931).

6. Janulaitis, Augustinas. Ignas Danilevičius Lietuvos bei jos teisės istorikas 159 (Spindulys 1932).

7. Kavolis, Martynas. Mūsų įstatymdavystė ir teisdarystė, in Lietuva: 1918–38 328 (Spaudos Fondas 1938).

8. Leonas, Petras. Teisės enciklopedijos paskaitos 143 (Lietuvos universiteto Teisių fakulteto leidinys 1924).

9. Leonavičius, Juozas. Petras Leonas – Lietuvos sąžinė (Technologija 2002).

10. Lietuvos teismas 1918–28 (Antanas Kriščiukaitis, ed.) (Teisingumo Ministerija 1930).Dalia Mikulėnienė, Valentinas Mikelėnas 113

11. Mačys, Vladas. Civilinio proceso paskaitos 29 (Teisių fakulteto leidinys 1924).

12. Maksimaitis, Mindaugas. Nacionalinės ir perimtos teisės koegzistencijos principai tarpukario Lietuvoje, in Lietuvos teisės tradicijos 139–40 (Justitia 1997).

13. Mikelėnas, Valentinas. The Common Core Project and the Lithuanian Private Law System, in Opening Up European Law: The Common Core Project towards Eastern and South Eastern Europe 196–98 (Mauro Bussani & Ugo Mattei, eds.) (Stämpfli, Sellier, Carolina Academic Press 2007).

14. Mikelėnienė, Dalia. The Highest Judicial Institution of Lithuania: History and Current Reforms, in The History of the Supreme Courts of Europe and the Development of Human Rights 266 (Pál Solt, ed.) (Alföldi Vyomda Zrt. 1999).

15. Šalkauskis, K. Teismų precedentai, 1938(41) Teisė 17–19.

16. Нольде А.Э. Очерки по истории кодификации местных гражданских законов при графе Сперанском. Выпуск I. Попытка кодификации литовско-польского права [Nol’de A.E. Ocherki po istorii kodifikatsii mestnykh grazhdanskykh zakonov pri grafe Speranskom. Vypusk I. Popytka kodifikatsii litovsko-pol’skogo prava [Alexander E. Nol’de, History of Codification of Local Civil Laws: Outline. Issue I. Attempting to

17. Codify the Lithuanian-Polish Law under Count Speransky]] (Senatskaya Tipografiya 1906); Выпуск II. Кодификация местного права Прибалтийских губерний [Vypusk II. Kodifikatsiya mestnogo prava Pribaltiiskikh gubernii [Issue II. Codification of Local Laws for the Baltic Governorates]] (Senatskaya Tipografiya 1914).

18. Нольде А.Э., Пергамент М.Я. Обозрение исторических сведений о составлении свода местных законов Западных губерний [Nol’de A.E., Pergament M.Ya. Obozrenie istoricheskikh svedenii o sostavlenii svoda mestnykh zakonov Zapadnykh gubernii [Review of Historical Data on Compilation of the Digest of Local Laws for the Western Governorates]] (R. Golike i A. Vil’borg 1910).

19. Пергамент М.Я., Нольде А.Э. Свод местных законов Западных губерний. Проект [Pergament M.Ya., Nol’de A.E. Svod mestnykh zakonov Zapadnykh gubernii. Proekt [Mikhail Ya. Pergament & Alexander E. Nol’de, Digest of Local Laws for the Western Governorates. Draft]] (R. Golike i A. Vil’borg 1910).

20. Судебная реформа. Т. 1 [Sudebnaya reforma. T. 1 [1 Judicial Reform]] 303–05 (Nikolai Davydov & Nikolai Polyansky, eds.) (Ob’edinenie 1915).