Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

All-Pervasive Legacies of Socialist Constitutionalism? The Case of Judiciary

Full Text:


The success of the legal transitions occurring in the 1990s was quite dubious. Although, as a result of enlargement of the EU, much of the “other Europe” became part of the European Union, it would be too simplistic to assume that, with the fall of the Berlin Wall, the region became part of Western European political and legal landscape. While the books of the old era were discarded, legislation repealed and new institutions created, one should not underestimate the continuing strength of the old values, principles and legal thought in general. After all, the authors of those discarded books remained in the academia, even if they seemingly started to produce – virtually overnight – new works, while defending new values and principles. Alongside with the academics, the entire legal personnel of the old era survived the systemic change, and this contributed to the persisting spirit of old legal culture. That is why the philosophies of the old socialist legal system were able, not only to survive, but to govern a substantial portion of the post-socialist legal and judicial discourse. The deepest layers of the old legal culture are resistant to sudden changes by their very nature. They seldom have a direct connection to the former official political ideology, and they are often clothed in the new legal vocabulary. Furthermore, the most persistent features of socialist legal culture are often those linked to the region’s illiberal pre-socialist past, although substantively modified during the era of socialism. I will show some examples of old socialist concepts which seem to be alive and well in the new legal system. First, I am going to deal with the authoritarian model of judicial process, which appears to prevail in the region of Central and Eastern Europe. The socialist conception of a judicial process continues to haunt the region even several decades after the fall of “existing socialism.” The parties continue to be viewed as passive objects in the post-communist litigation. Second, I am going to explain a specific socialist novelty, the concept of supreme courts’ interpretative statements, legislating from the bench without any real-life case pending before those courts. Last but not least, I will show the gradual decline of the activist role of constitutional courts in the region and the return to the tradition of self-restrained judiciary influenced by politics and politicians.

About the Author

Zdenek Kühn
Charles University
Czech Republic

Zdenek Kühn – Professor of Jurisprudence, Faculty of Law, Charles university

7 nám. Curieových, Praha 1, 116 40


1. A megtalált alkotmány: a magyar alapjogi bíráskodás első kilenc éve [The Constitution Found? The First Nine Years of Hungarian Constitutional Review on Fundamental Rights] (Halmai Gábor ed., 2000).

2. Bobek M. The Fortress of Judicial Independence and the Mental Transitions of the Central European Judiciaries, 14(1) Eur. Pub. L. 99 (2008).

3. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective (Wojciech Sadurski ed., 2002).

4. Damaška M.R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process (1986).

5. Davies Chr. Hostile Takeover: How Law and Justice Captured Poland’s Courts (2018).

6. Dupré C. Importing the Law in Post-Communist Transitions: The Hungarian Constitutional Court and the Right to Human Dignity (2003).

7. Emmert F. The Independence of Judges – A Concept Often Misunderstood in Central and Eastern Europe, 3(4) Eur. J. L. reform 405 (2002).

8. Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study (D. Neil MacCormick & Robert S. Summers eds., 1991).

9. Jolowicz J.A. Da mihi factum dabo tibi jus: A Problem of Demarcation in English and French Law in Multum non multa: Festschrift für Kurt Lipstein aus Anlass seines 70. Geburtstages 79 (Peter Feuerstein & Clive Parry eds., 1980).

10. Kischel U. Comparative Law (2019).

11. Kühn Z. Making Constitutionalism Horizontal: Three Different Central European Strategies in The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism 217 (Fndrás Sajó & Renáta Uitz eds., 2005).

12. Kühn Z. The Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: Mechanical Jurisprudence in Transformation? (2011).

13. Kulic D. The Constitutional Court of Yugoslavia in the Protection of Basic Human Rights, 11(2) Osgoode Hall L.J. 275 (1973).

14. Mańko R. Survival of the Socialist Legal Tradition? A Polish Perspective, 4(2) Comp. L. rev. 1 (2014).

15. Mańko R. The Culture of Private Law in Central Europe After Enlargement: A Polish Perspective, 11(5) Eur. L.J. 527 (2005).

16. Procházka R. Mission Accomplished: On Founding Constitutional Adjudication in Central Europe (2002).

17. Rodin S. Discourse and Authority in European and Post-Communist Legal Culture, 1(1) Croat. Y.B. Eur. L. Pol’y 1 (2005).

18. Sadurski W. Polish Constitutional Tribunal Under PiS: From an Activist Court, to a Paralysed Tribunal, to a Governmental Enabler, 11(1) Hague J. Rule L. 63 (2018).

19. Sadurski W. Rights Before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (2nd ed. 2014).

20. Sólyom L. & Brunner G. Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court (2000).

21. Sulikowski A. Government of Judges and Neoliberal Ideology in Law and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present 16 (Rafał Mańko et al. eds., 2016).

22. Trochev A. The Russian Constitutional Court and the Strasbourg Court: Judicial Pragmatism in a Dual State in Russia and the European Court of Human Rights: The Strasbourg Effect 125 (Lauri Mälksoo & Wolfgang Benedek eds., 2017).

23. Vining J. The Authoritative and the Authoritarian (1986).

For citation:

Kühn Z. All-Pervasive Legacies of Socialist Constitutionalism? The Case of Judiciary. Russian Law Journal. 2021;9(2):26-43.

Views: 359

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)