Preview

Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

The Silk Road of Social Partnership

https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-4-109-139

Full Text:

Abstract

The article discusses the prospects and impediments of collective bargaining legislation’s harmonization of six participants (China, Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus, Poland, and Germany) in the railway project that has linked China and Europe and has become an integral part of the New Silk Road global initiative. To this effect, the authors have analyzed transnational companies’ experience in making collective contracts and have assessed the degree of the impact of international treaties on the aforementioned countries’ legislation in terms of their involvement in various international organizations’ activities and ratification of the most significant international acts. Based on a comparative analysis of a collective contract’s legislation, the authors have singled out some key features influencing transnational companies’ collective bargaining practices. The analysis revealed the norms and practices that impede and/or boost the extraterritorial application of transnational companies’ collective contracts. Since the countries are members of various international organizations, the international acts on freedom of collective bargaining made it possible to identify legal grounds for distinctions between the social partnership’s legal policies. A meticulous study of individual transnational companies’ collective bargaining agreements and practices enabled the authors to identify systemic links and the Transnational Companies’ (hereinafter – TNCs) practice of determinism due to international regulation and the laws of the country of origin. The research revealed the principal steps forward which should be taken to resolve the issues of extraterritorial application of TNCs’ collective agreements.

About the Authors

Larisa Zaitseva
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Professor, Head of the Labor and Entrepreneurship Department, Acting Director, Institute of State and Law

38 Lenina St., tyumen, 625000



Svetlana Racheva
University of Tyumen
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, English Language Department

38 Lenina St., tyumen, 625000 



References

1. Antoine R.-M.B. Rethinking Labor Law in the New Commonwealth Caribbean Economy: A Framework for Change, 32(2) Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 343 (2011).

2. Banks K. Trade, Labor and International Governance: An Inquiry into the Potential Effectiveness of the New International Labor Law, 32(1) Berkeley Journal of employment and Labor Law 45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1657745

3. Blanpain R. Comparativism in Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies 3 (r. Blanpain (ed.), alphen aan den rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014).

4. Blanpain R. et al. The Study of International and Comparative Employment Law in Blanpain r. et al. The Global Workplace: International and Comparative Employment Law: Cases and Materials (Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBo9780511818011.001

5. Bogg A. Subsidiarity or Freedom of Association? A Perspective from Labor Law, 61(1) american Journal of Jurisprudence 143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auw007

6. Bourque R. International Framework Agreements and the Future of Collective Bargaining in Multinational Companies, 12 Just Labour 30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.25071/1705-1436.78

7. Brown R.C. China’s Collective Contract Provisions: Can Collective Negotiations Embody Collective Bargaining?, 16(1) duke Journal of Comparative & international Law 35 (2006).

8. dau-Schmidt K.G. The Changing Face of Collective Representation: The Future of Collective Bargaining, 82(2) Chicago-Kent Law review 903 (2007).

9. Harper Hov.E. From Contracts to Compliance: An Early Look at Implementation under China’s New Labor Legislation, 23(1) Columbia Journal of asian Law 35 (2009).

10. Jessup P. Transnational Law (new Haven: yale university Press, 1956).

11. Li M.-C. Legal Aspects of Labor Relations in China: Critical Issues for International Investors, 33(3) Columbia Journal of transnational Law 521 (1995).

12. milman-Sivan F. Book Review: Arturo Bronstein, International and Comparative Labour Law: Current Challenges (Palgrave Macmillan and International Labour Office, 2009), 59(1) american Journal of Comparative Law 289 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2010.0024

13. Recent Development: The North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation: Linking Labor Standards and Rights to Trade Agreements, 12 american university Journal of international Law & Policy 815 (1997).

14. Silverstein M.o. Introduction to International Mediation and Arbitration: Resolving Labor Disputes in the United States & the European Union, 1(1) american university Labor & employment Law Forum 101 (2011).

15. Spink C.A. & Krudewagen u. From Acquired Rights to Reverse Tupe: Employment Law Issues in Global Outsourcing Transactions, 9(1) Chicago-Kent Journal of international and Comparative Law 46 (2009).

16. tomashevski K.L. Transnational Collective Agreements and Global Collective Treaties in Russia and the EU, 2(25) transition Studies review 3 (2018).

17. Warner M. & Sek-Hong n. Collective Contracts in Chinese Enterprises: A New Brand of Collective Bargaining Under ‘Market Socialism’?, 37(2) British Journal of industrial relations 295 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00128

18. Zerk J.A. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law, 10(1) Journal of international economic Law 161 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgl048


For citation:


Zaitseva L., Racheva S. The Silk Road of Social Partnership. Russian Law Journal. 2020;8(4):109-139. https://doi.org/10.17589/2309-8678-2020-8-4-109-139

Views: 320


ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)