Russian Law Journal

Advanced search

International Financial Standards in the Global Legal Order and in EU and EAEU Law

Full Text:


The global financial crisis strengthened the role of international financial standards in globacommerciaarchitecturanoutlinethspecializatioostandard-settingbodies. These standards may be transposed in international agreements or be implemented in the legal order of states and state communities (such as the European Union (EU) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)). The development of standard-setting bodies and the evolving process of soft law rulemaking have led to the establishment of a specific mechanism, which may be called “the soft law mechanism.” The authors argue that this mechanism includes several components: normative (IFS), institutional (SSBs), controlling (peer reviews), and assuring (implementing incentives) components. However, despite the rising influence of international financial standards, a strict boundary between soft and hard law should be established. This article outlines these boundaries and justifies the use of the term soft law. In post-crisis global financial regulation, the role of soft law has increased not only in the financial market but also in the field of monetary regulation. Along with the traditional mechanisms of financial support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), states may use alternative bilateral and regional mechanisms. At the level of integration associations, soft law manifests in different ways. In the EU, despite the expansion of its field of action, soft law is purely an auxiliary element of the Union’s legal system. In EAEU law, the mechanism of soft-law regulation can beconsidered promising, given the peculiarities of the integration model.


About the Authors

Ilya Lifshits
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, department of international Law

6А vorobievskoe hwy., Moscow, 119285

Vladislav Ponamorenko
Russian Foreign Trade Academy
Russian Federation

Associate Professor, department of Public Law

6А vorobievskoe hwy., Moscow, 119285


1. Alexander k. Global Financial Standard Setting, the G10 Committees, and Interna- tional Economic Law, 34(3) Brooklyn Journal of international Law 861 (2009).

2. Boklan d. & Lifshits i. Eurasian Economic Union Court and WTO Dispute Settlement Body: Two Housewives in One Kitchen, 7(3) russian Law Journal 169 (2019). https://

3. Brummer C.J. How International Financial Law Works (and How it Doesn’t), 99(2) Georgetown Law Journal 257 (2011).

4. Brummer C.J. Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance–and not Trade, 13(3) Journal of international economic Law 623 (2010).

5. Csatlós e. Public Administrative Law in a Globalized Concept: Legal Nature of the Collaboration of the EU and the Basel Committee, 22(2) Journal of international economic Law 229 (2019).

6. de Stefano C. Reforming the Governanceof International Financial Lawinthe Era of Post-Globalization, 20(3) Journal of international economic Law 289 (2017).

7. Donnelly s. Financial Stability Board (FSB), Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and Financial Market Regulation Bodies in Research Handbook on the European Union and International Organizations 360 (R.A. Wessel & J. Odermatt (eds.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019).

8. Gadbaw r.M. Systemic Regulation of Global Trade and Finance: ATale of Two Systems, 13(3) Journal of international economic Law 551 (2010).

9. Gianviti F. Decision Making in the International Monetary Fund in Current Developments in Monetary and Financial Law. Vol. 1 31 (washington: iMF, 1999).

10. Gold J. Strengthening the Soft International Law of Exchange Arrangements, 77(3) American Journal of international Law 443 (1983). International Monetary and Financial Law: The Global Crisis (M. Giovanoli & d. devos (eds.), Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2010).

11. Klabbers J. International Law (2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 2017).

12. Lastra r.M. Legal Foundations of International Monetary Stability (Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2006).

13. Lowenfeld A.F. International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2008). Milano e. & Zugliani N. Capturing Commitment in Informal, Soft Law Instruments:

14. A Case Study on the Basel Committee, 22(2) Journal of international economic Law 163 (2019).

15. Nance M.T. Naming and Shaming in Financial Regulation: Explaining Variation in the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering in The Politics of Leverage in Interna¬tional Relations 123 (H.R. Friman (ed.), London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015). https://doi. org/10.1057/9781137439338_7

16. Norton J.J. Comment on the Developing Transnational Network(s) in the Area of International Financial Regulation: The Underpinnings of a New Bretton Woods II Global Financial System Framework, 43(1) international Lawyer 175 (2009).

17. Proctor C. Mann on the Legal Aspect of Money (7th ed., Oxford: Oxford university Press, 2012).

18. Raustiala K. The Architecture of International Cooperation: Transgovernmental Networks and the Future of International Law, 43(1) virginia Journal of international Law 1 (2002).

19. Shaffer G. & waibel M. The Rise and Fall of Trade and Monetary Legal Orders: From the Interwar Period to Today's Global Imbalances in Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets 289 (G. Mallard & J. sgard (eds.), New York: Cambridge university Press, 2016). B.A. The Legalization of International Monetary Affairs, 54(3) international Organization 573 (2010).

20. Thorstensen v. et al. The 'Missing Link' Between the WTO and the IMF, 16(2) Journal of international Economic Law 353 (2013). tietje C. The Role of Law in Monetary Affairs: Taking Stock in The Rule of Law in Monetary Affairs: World Trade Forum 11 (T. Cottier et al. (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 2014).

21. Viterbo A. The European Union in the Transnational Financial Regulatory Arena: The Case of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 22(2) Journal of international economic Law 205 (2019).

22. Weber R.H. Does Financial Law Suffer from a Systemic Failure? A Study of the Fragmentation of Legal Sources in International Economic Law After the Global Crisis: A TaleofFragmentedDisciplines 33 (C.L. Lim & B. Mercurio (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge university Press, 2015).

23. Weber R.H. Multilayered Governance in International Financial Regulation and Supervision, 13(3) Journal of international economic Law 683 (2010).

24. Weiss F. The Device of Soft Law: Some Theoretical Underpinnings in The Changing Landscape of Global Financial Governance and the Role of Soft Law 47 (F. weiss & A.J. kammel (eds.), Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2015).

25. Wouters J. & Odermatt J. Comparing the 'Four Pillars'ofGlobal Economic Governance: A Critical Analysis of the Institutional Design of the FSB, IMF, World Bank and WTO, 17(1) Journal of international economic Law 74 (2014).

26. Wu C.-h. Legal Aspects of the WTO/IMF Relationship Revisited in Reflections on the Constitutionalisation of International Economic Law: Liber Amicorum for Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann 277 (M. Cremona et al. (eds.), Leiden: Brill, 2013).

27. Yu C. Currency Manipulation and WTO Laws: Should the Anti-Dumping Mechanism Be Entirely Dumped?, 20(6) Journal of world investment & trade 891 (2019). https://

For citation:

Lifshits I., Ponamorenko V. International Financial Standards in the Global Legal Order and in EU and EAEU Law. Russian Law Journal. 2020;8(3):4-31.

Views: 246

ISSN 2309-8678 (Print)
ISSN 2312-3605 (Online)