COMPARISON OF THE USE PRINCIPLES OF BUSINESS CONTINUITY IN BANKRUPTCY LAW AND THE JUDGE'S CONSIDERATION DECIDES THE BANKRUPTCY CASE BETWEEN INDONESIA AND WITH UNITED STATES
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to compare the use of the principles of business continuity in bankruptcy law and judge's considerations in deciding bankruptcy cases between Indonesia and countries that use the common law system, especially in the United States.This research method is normative juridical using secondary data obtained from literature studies and supported by analysis of solutions through conceptual approaches, comparisons, and case studies of bankruptcy decisions at the first-level commercial court in Central Jakarta.The results of this study indicate that the United States has applied the principles of business continuity to companies that are healthy with the insolvency test, while Indonesia has not, so it is necessary to use it as the judge's main consideration. Based on data, the panel of judges used the principles of business continuity at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court in deciding bankruptcy cases as the main consideration for only 1.9% of the 416 total decisions from 2015 to 2022. There are several articles in Law 37/2004 that do not reflect the principles of continuity of business, especially the articles that are often used by judges to decide on bankruptcy cases, namely article 1 paragraph (1) regarding "the definition of bankruptcy" and article 2 paragraph (1) concerning "the terms of bankruptcy" including the article related to article 8 paragraph (4).Recommended that lawmakers carry out a reconstruction of the articles that are often used by judges in deciding bankruptcy cases.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abe, S. (2003). The Japanese Corporate Reorganization Reform Law of 2002. In Am. Bankr. Inst. J. 36.
Crespi, G. S. (2011). Teaching The New Law and Economics (Vol. 25, Issue 3, pp. 715–717). The University of Toledo Law Review.
d’Agostino, F., &Greenberg Max E.R. (2022). The Economic Analysis of Law. In First published Mon Nov 26, 2001; substantive revision Fri Jan 7, 2022. Lewis Kornhauser.
Hindra. (2012). Telkomsel: PutusanPailit Tak Pengaruhi Kinerja. Kompas.Com.
Levinthal, L. E. (1918). The Early History of Bankruptcy Law. The University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 66, 223–224.
Lieberman, J. K., & Siedel, G. J. (1989). Legal Environment of Business. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lindsey, T., & Taylor, V. (2000). Rethinking Indonesian Insolvency Reform: Contexts and Frameworks. In Ausaid, Desert Pea Press (p. 2).
Mercuro, N., &Medumo, S. G. (1999). Economic and The Law: From Posner to Post-modernism (pp. 58–59). Princenton University Press.
Mertokusumo, S., &Pitlo, A. (1993). Bab-babtentangpenemuanhukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Miller, H. R., &Waisman, C. Y. (2004). Does Chapter 11 Reorganization Remain a Viable Option for Distressed Businesses for the Twenty-First Century? In 78 Am. Bankr. L. J. 153 (pp. 199–200).
Nesvold, H. P., Anapolsky, J. M., &Lajoux, A. R. (2011). The Art of Distressed M&A: Buying, Selling, and Financing Troubled and Insolvent Companies. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Philipson, T. J., & Posner, R. A. (1993). Private Choices and Public Health: The AIDS Epidemic in an Economic Perspective.
Posner, R. (1973). Economics Analysis of Law. Little, Brown and Company.
Pujiyono, P., Waluyo, B., &Manthovani, R. (2021). Legal threats against the existence of famous brands a study on the dispute of the brand Pierre Cardin in Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2018-0006
Pujiyono, Wiwoho, J., &Sutopo, W. (2017). Implementation of Javanese traditional values in creating accountable corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-06-2016-0060
Ramli, A. M. (2008). Koordinasi dan HarmonisasiPeraturanPeundang-undangan.
Schick, S. E. (2006). Globalization, Bankruptcy and Myth of the Broken Bench. In 80 Am. Bankr. L.J. 219.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum KepailitanMemahamiUndang-UndangNomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentangKepailitan dan PenundaanKewajibanPembayaran. Kencana.
Sjahdeini, St. R., & Ismail, T. (2014). Corporate Rescue UntukKepailitan Perusahaan. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 33(1).
Soehartono. (2014). MengembangkanPemikiran Hakim DalamMenyelesaikanSengketa. Yustisia Vol. 3 No. 1 Januari - April 20, 3(1).
Sulistiyono, A. (2018). Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik. Penerbit Prenadanamedia Group.
Suwadi, P., Ayuningtyas, P.W., Septiningrum, S.Y. and Manthovani, R. (2022), "Legal comparison of the use of telemedicine between Indonesia and the United States", International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-04-2022-0032,link: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHRH-04-2022-0032/full/html?skipTracking=true
Tabb, C. J. (2005). Lessons from the Globalization of Consumer Bankruptcy. In 26 Mich. J. Int’l 619. 30 Law & Soc. Inquiry 763.
Thompson, J. H. (1967). The Principles of Bankruptcy Law. HFL Publishers.
Widyantari, P., &Sulistiyono, A. (2020). PELAKSANAAN HARMONISASI RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI (RUU PDP). Jurnal Privat Law, VIII(1).
Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asaskepastianhukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatandalamkaitannyadenganputusankepailitanPengadilanNiaga. JurnalDinamika Hukum, 14(2).
Yohanes, T., Sulistiyono, A., &Hawin, M. (2017). Legally Binding of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body’s Decision. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i2.1107
Zywicki, T. J., & Sanders, A. B. (2008). Posner, Hayek, and the Economic Analysis of Law. In George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper (Vol. 93, Issue 2, pp. 559–603).