CONSTITUTIONALISM IN LAND ACQUISITION FOR PUBLIC INTEREST: A COMPARISON BETWEEN INDONESIA, RUSSIA AND SEVERAL OTHER COUNTRIES.
Main Article Content
Abstract
The most intimate relationship between a state and its citizens is manifested in the acquisition of land for the public interest. This article aims to analyze the comparative constitutional norms governing land acquisition for the public interest. Utilizing a doctrinal writing methodology with a comparative approach, it was discovered that among the five nations whose constitutions were compared, only Indonesia did not explicitly regulate land acquisition for the public interest within its constitution. Russia, America, and China explicitly regulate land acquisition for the public interest within their respective constitutions. South Africa, on the other hand, regulates land acquisition for the public interest both explicitly and elaborately within its constitution. The regulation of land acquisition for the public interest within a constitution is of paramount importance and embodies constitutional values that safeguard, respect, and fulfill citizens’ rights concerning their land and property when it is to be utilized for state interests (public interest).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Swela, E. Santosa, and D. Manar, 2017, “Analisis Dampak Pembebasan Tanah dan Nilai Ganti Rugi Terhadap Kondisi Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Waduk Logung di Desa Kandangmas dan Desa Tanjungrejo Kabupaten Kudus”, Journal of Politic and Government Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 41-50.
Achmad Sodiki, 2013, “Politik Hukum Agraria”, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, hlm. 253-254.
Ade Arif Firmansyah et all, 2015, “Land Acquisition In Accelerating And Expansion Of Indonesia’s Economic Development Program: A Review Of Law, Moral And Politic Relations”, South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 7, Issue 4 August ISSN 2289-1560, P.18.
Ade Arif Firmansyah et all, 2016, “Law Design Of Institutions Coordination As An Efforts To Harmonize Policy Housing Development Around The Airport In Indonesia”, South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, Vol. 11, Issue 4 December ISSN 2289-1560, P.52-53.
Aleksey Anisimov, Anatoliy Ryzhenkov, Elena Menis, Acquisition Of Private Ownership Over Land Plots In Russia By Virtue Of Acquisitive Prescription: Issues and Prospects, Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 72-86.
Bryn Perrins: “In principle, anything growing in the land is part of the land: trees, shrubs, plants, flowers, vegetables, grass”. Bryn Perrins, 2000, Understanding Land Law, Cavendish Publishing (UK) 3rd edition, London, P. 28.
Chengri Ding, Policy and Praxis of Land Acquisition in China, Land Use Policy 24 (2007), P. 3.
Christiana Tri Budhayati, 2012, “Kriteria Kepentingan Umum Dalam Peraturan Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Pembangunan di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Refleksi Hukum Edisi April, hlm 40.
Cici Mindan Cahyani dan Arief Rahman, 2021, “Kajian Yuridis Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja” Jurnal Private Law Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram, Volume 1, Issue 2, Juni hlm. 160.
Daniel S. Lev, “The Lady and the Banyan Tree: Civil-Law Change in Indonesia”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 14. No. 2 (spring, 1965). P. 290.
Edi Rohaedi, Isep H. Insan dan Nadia Zumaro, 2019, “Mekanisme Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum”, Pakuan Law Review Volume 5, Nomor 1, Januari-Juni hlm. 198.
Fengky Kotalewala, Adonia Ivone Laturette dan Novyta Uktolseja, 2020, “Penyelesaian Sengketa dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Jalan untuk Kepentingan Umum”, SASI Vol.26 No.3,Juli-September hlm.415.
Francois Venter, 2000, “Utilizing Constitutional Values In Constitutional Comparison”, Article, Juta and Kluwer Cape Town, Cambridge (MA) and Dordrecht) P. 1-21.
Hendra Karianga and Ahsan Yunus, Overlapping For Land Ownership Rights: Alternative Dispute Resolution By Ombudsman, Russian Law Journal, VolumeX(2022)Issue1, P. 1.
Jan Holthuis, Li Jiao and Shu Liu, In brief: agricultural land acquisition and use in China, Buren NV - https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=b9a537 b4-f636-45f2-aab0-a37da3fa9d85, diakses 10 Maret 2023.
Lieke Lianadevi Tukgali, 2010, “Fungsi Sosial Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum”, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia, hlm. 427.
Liubov Suliandziga, Russian Federation: Indigenous Peoples and Land Rights, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/IPeoples/EMRIP/RightToLand/LiubovSuliandzigaRussianFederation.pdf. diakses 10 Maret 2023.
Maria SW. Sumardjono, 2009, “Tanah Dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi Sosial dan Budaya”, Kompas, Jakarta, cet 2- hlm 249.
Mohammad Mulyadi, 2017, “Implementasi Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Jakarta Utara”, Aspirasi Vol. 8 No. 2, hlm. 146.
Mukmin Zakie, 2011, “Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Perbandingan antara Malaysia dan Indonesia)”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Edisi Khusus, Vol. 18, hlm. 189.
Richard English, Frederick E. Brusberg, 2002, “(The International Finance Corporation (IFC), the World Bank Group), Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan”, Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, P. 11.
Rutherford H. Platt, 2004, “Land Use and Society (revised edition)”, Island Press, Washington D.C., P. 278.
Sahnan, M. Yazid Fathoni, Musakir Salat, 2015, “Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Pembebasan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum”, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol III Nomor 9, hlm. 422.
Scott Armstrong, Closing The Gap On Moral R Elativity: Comparing Human Rights Regimes In The United States And The Russian Federation, Russian Law Journal, Volume IV (2016) Issue 1, P. 100.
Shelin Nabila Wibowo, 2021,Yani Pujiwati dan Betty Rubiati, “Kepastian Hukum Ganti Kerugian Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Jalan Tol Cisumdawu”, Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Volume 4, Nomor 2, Juni hlm. 192.
Suntoro, A 2019, “Penilaian Ganti Kerugian Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum: Perspektif HAM”, Bhumi, Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm. 13-25.
Tim Penyusun, “Naskah Akademik Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum”, DPR-RI, Jakarta, 2010, hlm 1.
Tim Penyusun, https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/search.html/?q=%22 Pengadaan%20tanah%20untuk%20kepentingan%20umum%22. Diakses 25 Mei 2022, Pukul 04.45 WIB.
Triana Rejekiningsih, 2016, “Asas Fungsi Sosial Hak Atas Tanah Pada Negara Hukum (Suatu Tinjauan Dari Teori, Yuridis Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia)”, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, Volume 5 No. 2, hlm. 300.
Yanto Sufriadi, 2011, “Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dalam Perpektif Hukum Progresif (Studi Kasus di Bengkulu)”, Disertasi, Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Yusriyadi, 2010, “Industrialisasi & Perubahan Fungsi Sosial Hak Milik Atas Tanah”, Genta Publishing, hlm. 25-26.
Zhang, Xueying;Lu, Haiyuan, Compensation for Compulsory Land Acquisition in China: to Rebuild Expropriated Farmers’ Long-Term Livelihoods, IRLE Working Papers, 2011,P 2.