INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF WOMEN – THE NORTH INDIAN SCENARIO

Main Article Content

RUCHITRA KAPARWAN, MONICA NARANG, ALKA MUDDGAL, RITU, PRABHA LAMA

Abstract

Indian women have had to fight for their property rights for a long time, just like women in other countries. Indian women's property rights are not fair or equal, but they have come a long way in the last 100 years. Indian women still have less property rights than men, both in terms of the amount and the quality of those rights.


When it involves property rights, Indian women have a lot of different ideas. India is home to a lot of various religions, and each one has its own rules about how to live. The right to own something is one of these aspects. Even among the different religions, there are subsets and local rules and customs that have their own property rights. A code of property rights was written down for Hindus, Sikhs, Monks, and Jains in 1956. Christians live by a different set of rules, and neither Shias nor Sunnis have put their property rights in writing. Also, tribal women from different faiths and states still adhere to the laws and traditions of their tribal groups when it did come to their property rights. The Indian Constitution states that both the central government as well as the state governments have the authority to pass legislation about succession, which makes things even more complicated. This means so each state can make its own rules about property, and some have done so.

Article Details

Section
Constitutional Law
Author Biography

RUCHITRA KAPARWAN, MONICA NARANG, ALKA MUDDGAL, RITU, PRABHA LAMA

  1. RUCHITRA KAPARWAN,

School of Commerce, GEHU, Dehradun 248002,

  1. MONICA NARANG

Associate Professor,The Law School, University of Jammu

  1. ALKA MUDDGAL,

Head, Amity Institute of Education, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida

  1. RITU,

Research Scholar, Department of Management, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala,133203, Haryana, India.

  1. PRABHA LAMA,

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Graphic Era Deemed To Be University, Dehradun, 248002,

References

Action aid and European Union. (2013). From marginalization to empowerment: The potential of land rights to contribute to gender equality - observation from Guatemala, India and Sierra Leone. Bangalore: Books for Change.

Agarwal, B. (1995, March 25). Gender and Legal Rights in Agricultural Land in India. Economic and Political Weekly , 39-56.

Allen Rubin and Earl Babbie. (2001). The Logic of Sampling. In Research Methods for Social Work (4th Edition ed., pp. 249-291). United State of America: Wadsworth.

Anjum, M. (2010). Assertive Voices: The otherside of burqa . In B. B. Patel (Ed.), Understanding Indian Society Past and Present (pp. 33-57). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Private Limited.

Benschop, M. (2004). Women's rights to land and property. Women in Human Settlement Development - Challenges and Opportunities . Land and Tenure Section: UN - HABITAT.

Berg, B. L. (2001). Designing Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th Edition ed., pp. 15-37). United State of America: Pearson Education.

Chapter 10: Property Rights of Women in India and Maintainence. (n.d.). Retrieved June 18, 2014, from www.ncw.nic.in

Chapter 4 Women Property Rights: A Comparative Study of Hindu, Christian and Muslim. (n.d.). Retrieved July 15, 2014, from shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in

Chowdhry, P. (n.d.). Reduction of Violence Against Women: Property Ownership & Economic Independence in Rural Haryana. Retrieved June 17, 2014, from www.unwomensouthasia.org

Corsini, E. (n.d.). Law alone cannot: Women's Empowerment in India. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from www.luc.edu

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Five Qualitative Approaches to Inquiry. In Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd Edition ed., pp. 53-81). London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). The Process of Conducting Research Using Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. In Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition ed., pp. 2-28). Boston: Pearson Education.

DAW. (2001). Empowerment of Women Throughout the Life Cycle as a Transformative Strategy for Poverty Eradication. Department of Economics and Social Affairs. New Delhi: United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UNDAW).

ESCR. (2014). Using CEDAW to secure women's land and property rights: A practical guide. 1-30. Switzerland: The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Culturl Rights.

Harry, K. (2009). The Indian Act and Aboriginal Women's Empowerment: What Front Line Workers Need to Know. for Battered Women's Support Services , 1-28. Canada: BWSS.

Iyer, D. K. (2010). Prospects and challenges in the Indian context. (294) . Kenya Nairobi: The African Executive.

Johannes Jutting and Christian Morrisson. (2005). Changing Social Institutions to Improve the Status of Women in Developing Countries. OECD Development Centre Policy Brief No. 27 , 1-26. Paris.

Joseph, N. (2013). Land Ownership of Women: Legal Issues and implementation hurdles (with special reference to succession rights to matrimonial property). 1-25. New Delhi: Network of Asia Pacific Schools and Institutes of Public Administration and Governance.

Kelkar, G. (2011). Gender and productive assets: Implications for women's economic security and productivity. Economic and Political Weekly, 46 (23), 59-68.

Kimani Njogu and Elizabeth Orchardson Mazrui. (2014). Gender inequality and women's rights in the great lakes: Can culture contribute to women's empowerment? 1-22. Africa: UNESCO.

Klaus Deininger, Aparajita Goyal and Hari Nagarajun. (2010). Inheritance law reform and women's access to capital: Evidence from India's Hindu Succession Act . Policy Research Working Paper 5338 . Washington: The World Bank.

Kodoth, P. (2004). Gender, Property Rights and Responsibility for Farming in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly, 39 (19), 1911-1920.

Lawyers Collective . (2010). Mapping women's gains in inheritance and property rights under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Expert Group meeting on Gender and Productive Resources: women's entitlement to land, livestock and energy . New Delhi: UN Women.

Madhu Kishwar and Ruth Vanita. (1990). Inheritance rights for women: A response to some commonly expressed fears. Manushi, 57, 3-9.

Mayra Gomez and D. Hien Tran. (2012). Women's land and property rights and the post-2015 development agenda. The Global Initiative for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Landesa Center for Women's Land Rights , 1-18.

Pandey, S. (n.d.). Property Rights of Indian Women. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from www.muslimpersonallaw.co.za

Rao, N. (2011). Women's access to land: An asian perspective. Enabling rural women's economic empowerment: institutions, opportunities and participation . Ghana: UN Women.

Rosenblum, D. (2013). Unintended Consequences of women's inheritance rights on female mortality in India. Dalhousie University, Department of Economics , 1-32. Canada

Roy, S. (2008). Female Empowerment through inheritance rights: Evidence from India. Department of Economics, London School of Economics , 1-20.

(2014). The Hindu Succession Act, 1956. In Bare act with short notes (pp. 27-50). New Delhi: Universal Law Publishing CO. PVT. LTD.

Vishwanath, L. (2010). Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Female Infanticide in Modern India. In B. B. Patel (Ed.), Understanding Indian Society Past and Present (pp. 93-127). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan Private Limited.

Yadav, B. (2000). Haryana's Rising 'Critical Insider (s)'. Economic and Political Weekly, 35 (50), 4383-4385