THE INDICATORS OF FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING AMONG STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES IN MALAYSIA

Main Article Content

NOR ‘ASYIQIN ABU, NOR AISHAH MOHD ALI, WAN SHAFIZAH HUSSAIN, ELINDA NORDIN, MOHD AB MALEK MOHD SHAH, ROHIMA SAAD

Abstract

One of the three levels of government in Malaysia is the state government organisation. The public is concerned about the fund governance within the entity because government agencies use public funds to carry out their everyday operations. Following the audit report released by the Auditor General's Department is one of the ways to check that public funds have been used responsibly. This research seeks to identify the different types of audit reports issued by the Auditor General Department in response to the public's growing concern regarding the financial oversight of these government agencies. (AGD). In order to accomplish the study's goal, a qualitative method using content analysis was applied to five years of data from 2013 to 2017 for audit report credentials issued to the condition government and reported online through the websites of the Auditor General Department (AGD). The results demonstrate that Melaka state government agencies reported the greatest number of Qualified Report incidences, at 23. The research also showed that the most common crimes involve faking liabilities and expenses, as well as altering the value of assets. These reports, which cover a period of more than five years, may point to possible fraudulent financial statement components or warning signs that may have occurred within government agencies. Such a situation could damage the organisation's reputation for good financial management and reflect poorly on public sector government bodies.

Article Details

Section
Financial Law
Author Biography

NOR ‘ASYIQIN ABU, NOR AISHAH MOHD ALI, WAN SHAFIZAH HUSSAIN, ELINDA NORDIN, MOHD AB MALEK MOHD SHAH, ROHIMA SAAD

Nor ‘Asyiqin Abu *1,  Nor Aishah Mohd Ali2, Wan shafizah Hussain3, Elinda Nordin4, Mohd Ab Malek Mohd Shah5, Rohima Saad6

1,2,3,4, Faculty of Accountancy, Universiti Teknologi MARA,

5, Department of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA,

6, Accounting Research Institute, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,

References

Abd Rauf, F.; Yusoff, H., Othman, R.; Yatim, N.; Pubalan, U.R. & Che Salleh, S. (2015). Public Sector Accounting: Malaysian Context. 4th edition. Kuala Lumpur. Pearson Allan, D. (1993). Someone Else's Money’: Learning from Economic Crime in the Public Sector. Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 1 Issue: 2, pp.147-155.

Asare, S. K., Wright, A., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2015). Challenges facing auditors in detecting financial statement fraud: Insights from fraud investigations. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 7(2), 63-112.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiner (ACFE), (2015). Common Financial Statement Frauds from ACFE: https://brisbaneacfe.org/library/third-party-fraud/common-financial-statement-frauds/ (March 2019).

Aziz, M.A.A., Rahman, H.A., Alam, M.M. and Said, J. (2015), “Enhancement of the accountability of public sectors through integrity system”, Internal Control System and Leadership Practices: A Review Study, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 28, pp. 163-169.

Beasley MS, Carcello JV, Hermanson DR. Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987–1997. An Analysis of Public Companies. New York, NY: COSO; 1999.

Cressey, D.R. (1950), “The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 738-743.

Douglas, E.Z. (1995). State and local government fraud survey for 1995", Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 11 Issue: 9, pp.50-55.

Eiji Oyamada, (2015) “Anti-corruption measures the Japanese way: Prevention matters”, Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol.4 Issue: 1, pp24-50.

Eiya, O., Otalor, J.I., 2013. Forensic accounting as a tool for Fighting Financial Crime in Nigeria. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2013, 4(6), 1-8.

Hashim, H.A., Salleh, Z., Shuhaimi, I. and Ismail, N.A.N. (2020), "The Risk of Financial Fraud: A Management Perspective", Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2020-0062.

Ismail, Aida Hazlin et al. Does Audit Quality Matters In Malaysian Public Sector Auditing? Journal of Academia, [S.l.], v. 7, p. 102-116, mar. 2020. ISSN 2289-6368. Available at: <http://myjms.moe.gov.my/index.php/joa/article/view/8257>. Date accessed: 13 Aug. 2020.

Jaafar, H., Halim, H. A., Ismail, R., & Ahmad, A. S. (2018). Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Impression Management: An Examination of Corporate Accounting Narratives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(10), 824–837. Malaysian Government, (2006). Audit Act 1957. Kuala Lumpur: National Printing Department.

Mohd Ali, N.A, Abu, N.A, Hussin, W.S, Nordin, E. (2017),"Profiling Fraud Committed by Public Sector Employees: Evidence from the Malaysian Media Reporting", Proceedings of the 3rd International Public Sector Conference 2017.

National Audit Department (2019). The State Governments’ Financial Statements from National Audit Department: http://www.audit.gov.my/index.php/en/financial-statement (February 2019).

National Centre for Governance, Integrity and Anti Corruption (GIACC), (2019). National Anti-Corruption Plan 2019-2023: http://integriti.my/giacc/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/National-Anti-Corruption-Plan-2019-2023.pdf/ (April 2019).

Pawi, S., Juanil, D.M., Zahari, W. and Yusoff, W. (2011), “Property Tax Performance of Local Authorities in Malaysia”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 42-46.

Rezaee Z, Causes, Consequences, and Deterrence of Financial Statement. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (2005) 277–298.

Singleton, T.W., Singleton, A.J, Bologna, G.J., Lindquist, R.J. (2006). Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. 3rd edition, Hoboken, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp.1-325.

United States General Accounting Office (GAO). Financial restatements, trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges; 2002.

Wolfe, D., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74 (12), 38-42.