CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY RELATED TO THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE DOCTRINE
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article will explain Corporate Criminal Liability related to the Business Judgment Rule doctrine. There are 2 (two) fundamental questions that are the object of research, first: to what extent is Corporate Criminal Liability related to the Business Judgment Rule doctrine, second: to what extent is the Business Judgment Rule doctrine applied in Indonesia? This article uses normative research in the form of regulations, conceptual, comparative approaches, cases, and interviews. This study emphasizes the interpretation and construction of law to obtain several legal norms, conceptions, lists of regulations, and their implementation in real situations. This research shows that Corporate Criminal Liability is related to the Business Judgment Rule doctrine and the application of the Business Judgment Rule doctrine in Indonesia as in the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, Article 97 paragraph (5) reads: Members of the Board of Directors cannot be held accountable for losses as referred to in paragraph (3) if it can prove: a. the loss is not due to his fault or negligence; b. has conducted management in good faith and prudence for the benefit and by the aims and objectives of the Company; c. does not have a conflict of interest, either directly or indirectly, for management actions that result in losses; and d. have taken action to prevent the loss from arising or continuing. Of the 4 (four) conditions outlined in the Law above, this is a requirement that must be met if the Business Judgment Rule doctrine is to be applied in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bettina Yahya, Kedudukan dan tanggung jawab Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Puslitbang hukum dan peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI,2016, 35.
Bewani Octavianisa Masrurah, Konsep Itikad Baik Dalam Penerapan Business Judgment Rule Berdasarkan Sistem Hukum Perseroan Indonesia Dan Malaysia, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 3. No. 3 November 2019, 184-188.
Companies Act 2016 of Malaysia.
Dahlstorm, C., and Victor, L. (2011). Myths of Corruption Prevention, What is (not) Good With a Weberian Bureaucracy?. APSA 2011, Annual Meeting,5.
Garrett, Brandon, Too Big Jail : How Procecutors Compromise with Corporations, Harvard University Press, 2014,18.
Harifin A.Tumpa,Aplication towards the Concept of Rechtsvinding and Rechtschepping by the Judges in Deciding a Case,volume 1 issue 2,August 2015, Hasanuddin Law Review, 127.
Hillman, A.J., and Michael A. Hitt. (1999). "Corporate Political Strategy Formulation: A Model of Approach, Participation, and Strategy Decisions". Academy of Management Review, 825
John C. Coffee Jr,"No Soul to Damn: No Body to Kick": An Unscandalized Inquiry into the Problem of Corporate Punishment,Michigan Law Review, volume 79,1981, 459.
Kinley, D., and Joseph, S. (2002). "Multinational Corporations and Human Rights: Questions about their Relationship: A New Research Project Studying the Evolving Legal and Human Rights Responsibilities of Corporations". Alta Law Journal,9.
Lilik Mulyadi, Membangun Model Ideal Pemidanaan Korporasi-Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Keadilan, Kencana,2021,199.
Lilik Mulyadi, The Revere Burden of Proof Against Corruption Law in Indonesian Criminal Law System Related With The 2003 United Nations Convention Against Corruption, volume 4,Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2015, 103.
Muhammad Akram Syarif Hayyi, Muhammad Said Karim, Aminuddin Ilmar, Urgency Of Applying The Doctrine Of Business Judgment Rule Against State-Owned Enterprise Directors In Corruption Cases, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Vol. 6, Nomor 1, Juni 2021, 75.
Robert A.G Monks And Nell Minow,Corporate Governance, Wiley,2008, 97.
Rodriguez, P., et al. (2006). "Three Lenses on the Multinational Enterprise: Politics, Corruption and Corporate Social Responsibility". Journal of International Business Studies,7.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia nomor 13 tahun 2016 tentang tata cara penanganan perkara tindak pidana korporasi.
Sollund, Ragnhild. Eco-global crimes: Contemporary problems and future challenges. Routledge, 2016,3
Supreme court of the Republic Indonesia, Laporan tahunan 2020 Optimalisasi Peradilan Modern berkelanjutan, Jakarta, Supreme court of the Republic Indonesia 2020, 261.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2004 tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.