EVOLVING LEGAL REMEDIES FOR ONLINE DEFAMATION IN INDIA: CHALLENGES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The phenomenon of online defamation in India has gained significant traction with the rise of digital platforms, leading to unique challenges in safeguarding individual reputations and balancing freedom of speech. Unlike traditional defamation, online defamation transcends geographical boundaries, making jurisdiction a complex issue and complicating legal remedies. The rapid dissemination of information on social media platforms, blogs, and websites exacerbates the impact of defamatory content, affecting the victims' social, professional, and personal standing almost instantaneously. Although India's Information Technology Act (ITA) and defamation laws provide some degree of redressal, they often fall short in addressing the dynamic and global nature of online defamation. Courts struggle with issues of jurisdiction, anonymity, and the fast-paced evolution of digital media, resulting in a need for legal reforms that reflect the changing digital landscape. This article examines the evolving legal framework for online defamation in India, focusing on the current challenges, legislative gaps, and judicial interpretations. It discusses the constraints of existing laws, such as the ITA and the Indian Penal Code, in effectively tackling online defamation, especially concerning anonymous perpetrators and cross-border defamation. Further, the article explores recent judicial responses and the need for robust legal mechanisms that address issues specific to the online realm. By analysing emerging international standards and comparing them with India’s regulatory approach, this study aims to propose viable legal remedies and reforms to protect individual rights in an increasingly digital society. The article concludes by highlighting the future directions and reforms needed to create a comprehensive legal framework that balances free speech and reputation in the online domain.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Sandra, Sakolciová. (2021). 20. Defamation on Social Media : Challenges of private international law. doi: 10.46282/BLR.2021.5.1.226
Amit, Kashyap. (2016). 2. Defamation in internet age: law & issues in india.
Berkley, D., Sells. (2006). 3. Recent developments in internet defamation law. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, doi: 10.1108/14770020680000563
Emily, B., Laidlaw. (2019). 4. Re-Imagining Resolution of Online Defamation Disputes. Osgoode Hall Law Journal,
Karen, Eltis. (2018). 8. Is “Truthtelling” Decontextualized Online Still Reasonable? Restoring Context to Defamation Analysis in the Digital Age. McGill Law Journal, doi: 10.7202/1066336AR
Prençe, Mirgen. (2012). 9. Defamation in cyberspace.
in, chang, yoo. (2012). 10. The Regulations by Criminal Law against any Libel in Cyberspace. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, doi: 10.9708/JKSCI.2012.17.5.177
Sapna, Sukrut, Deo. (2016). 14. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013: Legislative Remedies for Online Harassment and Cyberstalking in India. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2712052
Siddharth, Narrain. (2019). 16. Social Media, Violence and the Law: ’Objectionable Material’ and the Changing Countours of Hate Speech Regulation in India. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, doi: 10.3384/CU.2000.1525.2018103388
Sanette, Nel. (2007). 17. Online defamation : the problem of unmasking anonymous online critics. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa,
Jeffrey, Segal., J, J, D, Michael, Sacopulos., J, J, D, Domingo, Rivera. (2009). 21. Legal Remedies for Online Defamation of Physicians. Journal of Legal Medicine, doi: 10.1080/01947640903146121
Alice, E., Marwick., Ross, Miller. (2014). 25. Online Harassment, Defamation, and Hateful Speech: A Primer of the Legal Landscape. Social Science Research Network,
Devanshu, Sajlan. (2021). 28. Hate Speech against Dalits on Social Media: Would a Penny Sparrow be Prosecuted in India for Online Hate Speech?.doi: 10.26812/CASTE.V2I1.260
Sapna, Sukrut, Deo. (2016). 22. The Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013: Legislative Remedies for Online Harassment and Cyberstalking in India. Social Science Research Network, doi: 10.2139/SSRN.2712052
Tomas, A., Lipinski., Elizabeth, A., Buchanan., Johannes, Britz. (2002). 38. Sticks and stones and words that harm: Liability vs. responsibility, section 230 anddefamatoryspeech in cyberspace. Ethics and Information Technology, doi: 10.1023/A:1019915520692