LEGAL STATUS OF AUTONOMOUS WEAPONS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW
Main Article Content
Abstract
Autonomous weapons systems (AWS) are weapons that can select and engage targets without human intervention. They are a controversial topic, as there is no clear consensus on their legality under international humanitarian law (IHL). Some experts argue that they are prohibited because they violate the principle of human control over weapons. Others argue that they could be legal if they meet certain requirements, such as human oversight, distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack.
There is currently no international treaty that specifically prohibits or regulates AWS, but the issue is under discussion between international community. Whatever, these kinds of weapons must respect international humanitarian law and its principles.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
- Eid Jabbari, A Legal View of the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Threat of Use of Nuclear Weapons, Journal of Law and Human Sciences, University of Djelfa, No. 12, 2008, p. 157.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, Autonomous Weapons in the Light of the Principles of International Humanitarian Law, Journal of Legal Sciences, Faculty of Law, University of Baghdad, Special Issue for researchers and Graduate Students, 2020, p. 284, 285.
- Ben Watson and Bradley Peniston, electronic article published on June 26, 2024 available online : https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2024/06/the-d-brief-june-26-2024/397666
- Article 48 of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
- However, the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons issued on 08/07/1996, although it did not explicitly refer to autonomous weapons, emphasized the principle of the law of war, which prohibits the use of weapons that do not distinguish between combatants and civilians, and since autonomous weapons may not adequately distinguish between military and civilian targets, this principle may aso apply to them.
- Abdul Ali Muhammad Sawadi, Shaimaa Taram Lifta Al-Nawfali, The Martens Doctrine and the Problem of the International Regulation of New Weapons, Journal of the Message of Law, University of Karbala, 10th year, Third Issue, 2018, p . 12 .
- International sovereignty is no longer an absolute concept as it was before, but is subject to a process of gradual restriction in favor of universal human values. In light of international developments, States have become aware of the need for international cooperation and the promotion of human solidarity, which leads them to give up some of their powers through international treaties. However, this concession is not a derogation from the sovereignty of the state, but rather an expression of its responsible exercise of its sovereignty, in accordance with its international obligations and its pursuit of its interests in a framework of global security and stability. - Abdul Rahman Munir, The Principle of State Sovereignty under the Concept of Humanitarian Intervention, Journal of the Voice of Law, Khamis Meliana University, Volume V, Issue 02, 2018, p. 67.
- Abdul Ali Mohammed Sawadi, Shaimaa Taram Lifta Al-Nawfali, op. Cit., P. 12
- Article 35 of Protocol I of 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, relating to the protection of victims of international armed conflicts stipulates that: "The right of the parties to an armed conflict to choose methods and means of warfare is not a right that is not restricted by restrictions." This rule is a peremptory norm that obliges the parties to the conflict to abide by it.
- Reference is made to paragraph 31 of the aforementioned 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice.
- The United Nations and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) called on political leaders to urgently establish new international rules on autonomous weapons systems. The two organizations said that those weapons that choose targets and use force without human intervention raise serious concerns. The two officials appealed to States to impose specific bans and restrictions on autonomous weapons systems to protect current and future generations from the consequences of their use. In the current global security landscape, clear international red lines would benefit all countries, they noted. ICRC report on autonomous weapons, paragraph 23. See also Article 1 of the 1980UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons that may produce excessive or indiscriminate effects. Signed at Geneva on October 10, 1983, and entered into force in December 1983.
- Reference is made to paragraph 31 of the aforementioned 1996 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice.
- Ben Watson and Audrey Decker, The D Brief: More US aid to Ukraine; Kyiv strikes Russian drone warehouse; Air Force's CCA costs rise; World of GPS, visualized; And a bit more. Published on July 3, 2024, available online: https://www.defenseone.com/topic/drones/
- For more details about the Russian leadership's view in international arms control and disarmament discussions. See , Anna Nadibaidze, Great power identity in Russia's position on autonomous weapons systems, continuity security policy, , vol. 43, No. 3, Routledje, taylor & francis, U K , 2022, available online on :
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13523260.2022.2075665?needAccess=true
- Article 52 of the 1907 Hague Convention Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed on18 October 1907in the Netherlands by 36 States.
- Article01, and Article 02 of the1954 Hague Convention on the Protection of Cultural Property, signed on May 14, 1954. The number of countries signed in 2024 reached 83.
- Mohamed Belkacem, Basic Principles for the Conduct of Hostilities during Armed Conflicts, Master's Memorandum, University of Algiers, Ben Youssef Ben Khedda, Algeria, Faculty of Law, 2010/2009, p. 30. See also Articles 52 to 55 of Additional Protocol I to the 1977 Geneva Conventions Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts, signed on 8 June 1977 in Geneva, Switzerland, where the number of signatories in 2024 reached 120, which entered into force on 03 December 1978.
- Report on international humanitarian law and the challenges of contemporary armed conflicts, Thirty-First Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, Geneva, Switzerland, November 28-December 1, 2011, p. 43. Available at the following link:
- Abdelkader Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Aqraa, Military Robots in Future Wars and Their Subjection to the Provisions of International Humanitarian Law, Legal Journal, Volume 8, Issue 3 , Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia, November 2020, p. 951.
- Melzer Niels, International Humanitarian Law, A Comprehensive Introduction, International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, 2016, p. 90.
- Yahya Yassin Saud, Cyber War in Light of the Rules of International Humanitarian Law, Legal Journal, Cairo University, Volume 4, Issue 2018, p. 94.
- Report on International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts, 32nd International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, op. Cit., P. 6.
- Abdelkader Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Aqraa, op. Cit., P. 949.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, op. Cit., P. 286, 287.
- Article 48 of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
- Article 51 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
- Abdelkader Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Aqraa, op. Cit., P. 949.
- Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Articles 51(5)(b) and 57(3)(a) and (b).
- John Marie Henckertes and Louise Duzwald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Volume I, Rules, International Committee of the Red Cross, Cairo, 2007, pp. 41, 42.
- While Article 22 of The Hague 1907 stipulates that the belligerents have no absolute right to choose the means of harming the enemy, which means that the conflicting countries during the hostilities must use the means of war, including equipment and weapons in a rational manner, so that the impact does not extend to civilians, which applies to all weapons, including lethal autonomous weapons.
- Rosho Khaled, Military Necessity in the Scope of International Humanitarian Law, PhD Thesis, Abu Bakr Belkaid University, Tlemcen, Faculty of Law and Political Science, 2013-2012, p. 145.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, op. Cit., P. 295.
- Al-Ashash Ishaq, Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems in International Law: An Approach to its Internationally prohibition Problem, Generation Human Rights Magazine, Issue 30, Algeria, p. 149.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, op. Cit., P. 295.
- Article 48 of Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
- Rosho Khaled, op. Cit., P. 82, 83 .
- Abdelkader Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Aqraa, op. Cit., P. 949.
- Dahmani Kamal, The Legal Status of Armed Drones in Humanitarian International Law, Journal of the Department of Legal and Political Research and Studies, Ahmed bin Yahya Al-Wansharisi University Center, 8th issue, 2020, p. 60.
- Salem Anwar Ahmed Al-Obaidi, The Legality of Targeted Killings by Drones within the Framework of International Humanitarian Law, Journal of Tikrit University of Legal Sciences, No. 222, Year 6, June 2014, p. 337.
- Rosho Khaled, op. Cit., P. 79.
- Marco Sassoli, International Humanitarian Law in Contemporary Armed Conflicts, International Committee of the Red Cross, p. 146. Available at the link:
https://www.icrc.org/en/resource-centre/result?r%3A [0] = document_type % 22% D8% A5% D8% B5% D8% AF % D8% A7% D8% B1% 22 & sort = date + desc
- Omar Mahmoud Omar, Electronic Warfare in International Humanitarian Law, Journal of Studies, Sharia and Law Sciences, University of Jordan, Volume 46, Issue 3, 2019, p. 142.
- Marco Sassoli, op. Cit., P. 61.
- Melzer Niels, op. Cit., P. 17, P. 19.
- Salem Anwar Ahmed Al-Obaidi, The Legality of Targeted Killings by Drones within the Framework of International Humanitarian Law, Journal of Tikrit University of Legal Sciences, No. 222, Year 6, June 2014, p. 337.
- Omar Saadallah, Dictionary of Contemporary International Law, Second Edition, Diwan of University Publications, Algeria, 2007, p. 285.
- Omar Mahmoud Omar, Electronic Warfare in International Humanitarian Law, Journal of Studies, Sharia and Law Sciences, University of Jordan, Volume 46, Issue 3, 2019, p. 142.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, op cit, p 294.
- Abdelkader Mahmoud Mohamed Al-Aqraa, op cit, p 948.
- Justin Mike Cleland, Review of Weapons in Accordance with Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, International Review of the Red Cross, No. 850, 2003, p. 20.
- See Article 36 of the First Additional Protocol of 1977, mentioned above.
- Justin Mike Cleland, op. Cit, P. 2.
- Doaa Jalil Hatem, op. Cit, P. 295.
-International Humanitarian Law, Handbook for Parliamentarians No. 25, Inter-Parliamentary Union and International Committee of the Red Cross, ICRC, 2016, p. 76.