THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL SERVICES QUALITY IN EGYPT “PERFORMANCE OF THE JUDICIAL SERVICES”

Main Article Content

SARA EL-SAADANY, MOHAMED SALEM, MOHAMED ABDEL SALAM

Abstract

Egypt has succeeded in achieving steady steps in implementing its strategy to build a digital Egypt, through which an integrated digital system is established to provide government services in a simplified manner that saves time and effort and eliminates red tape, and corruption to achieve better government services quality. Digital government has provided opportunities for judicial bodies to adapt information technology to serve justice and law and achieve better judicial service quality, considering that the concept of measuring judicial service quality applied to the judiciary is the subject of heated debates worldwide. For a long time, measuring the judicial services quality has been based on identifying a few indicators focusing on a few specific aspects of the justice system till 2012. However, international organizations including the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the European Commission for The Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), and the World Bank, monitor several quality and performance indicators commonly applied in European countries and the rest of the world. Furthermore, since 2013, the European justice scorecard, published annually by the European Commission (CEPEJ), provides information on the judicial services quality, independence, and effectiveness of the justice system in all member states. This research paper will measure the quality of justice for Egyptian State Council (ESC) judicial services focusing on measuring the performance of the judicial services indicators according to the European Commission (CEPEJ), which is significant as it constitutes a source of information on significant indicators of the administrative judicial services quality in Egypt.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

. CEPEJ-GT-QUAL group, working paper, “Measuring the Quality of Judicial Services”, Coe.int. (2017). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/1680747548 .

. Opinion n°11 (2008) of the Consultative Council of European Judges (CCJE) on "the quality of judicial decisions". Available at: https://www.courtexcellence.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0023/4919/ccje.pdf

. https://esc.gov.eg . The official web site of the Egyptian State Council, (2024)

. MyBib Contributors (2019). APA Citation Generator – FREE & Fast – (6th Edition, 2019). [online] MyBib. Available at: https://www.mybib.com/tools/apa-citation-generator.

. European judicial systems Efficiency and quality of justice. (2016). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/european-judicial-systems-efficiency-and-quality-of-justice-cepej-stud/1680786b58, section 1.

. CEPEJ Guidelines European Commission for the efciency of justice (CEPEJ). (n.d.). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-guidelines/16809f007a, section 5.

. European judicial systems Efficiency and quality of justice. (2016). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/european-judicial-systems-efficiency-and-quality-of-justice-cepej-stud/1680786b58, section 5.

. European judicial systems Efficiency and quality of justice. (2016). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/european-judicial-systems-efficiency-and-quality-of-justice-cepej-stud/1680786b58, section 3.

. European Commission For The Efficiency Of Justice (CEPEJ) Revised Saturn Guidelines For Judicial Time Management (3 rd revision). (n.d.). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2018-20-e-cepej-saturn-guidelines-time-management-3rd-revision/16808ff3ee, section 5.

. European judicial systems Efficiency and quality of justice. (2016). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/european-judicial-systems-efficiency-and-quality-of-justice-cepej-stud/1680786b58, (Q46 and Q52 of the CEPEJ evaluation scheme).

. Calabrese R. “La giustizia vista dall’utente. Un’indagine di customer satisfaction presso il Palazzo di Giustizia di Torino.” November 2013.

. United Nations E-Government Survey, (2020). “Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development”, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations,

. G.Misuraca, E.Barcevičius and C.Codagnone,” Shaping Digital Government Transformation in the EU”, The European Commission, (2021).

. A.Cordella, F.Contini,”Digital Technologies for Better Justice”, Inter-American Development Bank, (2020).

. World Bank Group, 2018. WGI Interactive. [Online] Available at: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#home

. The Constitution of the Arab Republic of Egypt, 2014 (2022). [Online] Available at: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Egypt_2014.pdf

. The Ministry of Communications and Information Technology (MCIT), 2022, [Online] Available at: https://mcit.gov.eg/en/Digital_Government

. G.Misuraca, E.Barcevičius and C.Codagnone,” Shaping Digital Government Transformation in the EU”, The European Commission, (2021).

. A.Cordella, F.Contini,”Digital Technologies for Better Justice”, Inter-American Development Bank, (2020).

. Ana Alvarenga, Florinda Matos, Radu Godina and João C. O. Matias, “Digital Transformation and Knowledge Management in the Public Sector”, MDPI, (2020).

. Resego Morakanyane, Philip O’Reilly, John McAvoy, and Audrey Grace, “Determining digital transformation success factors”, the 53rd Hawaii International Conference, (2020).