THE CHANGING PERSPECTIVE ON HOMOSEXUALITY IN INDIAN CULTURE

Main Article Content

SIMRAT, SULAKSHANA BANERJEE MUKHERJEE

Abstract

In 2018, a ray of hope finally broke through the lengthy veil of prejudice that has surrounded LGBTQ people in India. The historic decision that decriminalized consenting gay conduct was a major victory in the fight for equality. But it's important to understand that, despite its significance, this legislative shift is only the start of a much-needed shift in public opinion. LGBTQ people have suffered greatly, sometimes even from inside their own families and society at large. The community has been forced to the periphery of understanding and acceptance time and time again.


Although the Indian Penal Code, 1860 formerly had a particular section that dealt with same-sex desire, the historic Navtej Singh Johar case compelled an analysis of these antiquated statutes. By decriminalizing consenting same-sex sexual behavior (Section 377, IPC, 1860), the Honourable Supreme Court made a daring move. It's important to remember that section 377 of IPC, 1860, still applies and punishes nonconsensual intercourse. Even if legalization is an important step, it is not enough to provide LGBTQ people the social and legal respect they are due. This research paper aims to offer a perceptive synopsis of the current situation that this minority group is facing. It aims to spread knowledge and debunk the damaging myths that have supported their marginalization. This research is about to illuminate the difficulties faced by people in this community by utilizing an abundance of social data and behavioral patterns. By doing this, we hope to promote a more accepting society and highlight the reality that these persons are just like everyone else and should be treated with respect and dignity they are neither unique nor odd.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

stitution of India, Art.14.

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Act 45 of 1860), s.377.

Jane P. Sheldon, Carla A. Pfeffer et.al. (eds.), “Beliefs about the Etiology of Homosexuality and about the Ramification of Discovering its Possible Genetic Origin,” 52 Journal of Homosexuality 3-4(2007).

Samarghandian, Saeed, et al. (eds.), “Honey and Health: A Review of Recent Clinical Research.” 9,2 Pharmacognosy Research 121-127(2017).

Bianca D.M. Wilson, Soon Kyu Choi et al. (eds.), “Homelessness among LGBT Adults in the U.S.”, available at <https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/lgbt-homelessness-us/> (4th January 2022)

Human Rights Campaign, “Sexual Assault and the LGBT Community, HRC.ORG,” available at <https://www.hrc.org/resources/sexual-assault-and-the-lgbt-community> (4th January, 2022)

The Buggery Act, 1533 (25 Hen. 8. c. 6).

Ibid.

Delhi Law Times 277.

The Constitution of India, Art.14

The Constitution of India, Art.15

The Constitution of India, Art.21

Civil Appeal No. 10972 of 2013.

Supra note 10.

INSC 275.

K.S. Puttaswamy v. UOI, Writ Petition (Civil) No 494 of 2012; (2017) 10 SSC 1; AIR 2017 SC 4161

AIR 2018 SC 4321.

Habeas Corpus Petition No. 8 of 2020.