THE ROLE OF OVERSIGHT BY THE COURT OF CASSATION IN SAFEGUARDING JUSTICE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Jan 4, 2024
Keywords:
Court of Cassation oversight justice comparative analysis procedural legitimacy fairness rule of law legal systems case studies legislative frameworks

Main Article Content

KOSRAT BASHAR MIRAN BAGI, TAVGA ABBAS TOWFIQ

Abstract

This article delves into the crucial role of oversight by the Court of Cassation in preserving justice through a comprehensive comparative analysis. Investigating its functions across diverse legal systems, the study illuminates the Court's pivotal role in upholding procedural legitimacy and ensuring fairness. Through an examination of case studies and legislative frameworks, the analysis explores the efficacy of oversight mechanisms in rectifying errors and maintaining the rule of law. By synthesizing empirical evidence and scholarly insights, the article provides a nuanced understanding of the Court's oversight role and its impact on justice systems worldwide.

Article Details

Issue
Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

KOSRAT BASHAR MIRAN BAGI, TAVGA ABBAS TOWFIQ

KOSRAT BASHAR MIRAN BAGI, PROF.DR.TAVGA ABBAS TOWFIQ

Near East University, Public law department, TRNC, 10 Mersin, TR-99040 Lefkosia, Türkiye

Near East University, Public law department, TRNC, 10 Mersin, TR-99040

Lefkosia, Türkiye

 

References

Bacigal, Ronald J., and Mary M. Cheh. Criminal Procedure: Constitutional Constraints Upon Investigation and Proof. West Academic Publishing, 2020.

Bergman, Paul, and Sara J. Berman-Barrett. Criminal Law: A Desk Reference. Nolo, 2011.

Cohen, Neil. "Judicial review and the legitimacy of administrative law." Yale Law Journal 103, no. 1 (1993): 183-254.

Dressler, Joshua. Understanding Criminal Procedure: Volume Two: Adjudication. LexisNexis, 2016.

Feeley, Malcolm M. "The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court." Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.

Golan, Talia Fisher. "Discretion and error in criminal justice administration." Law & Society Review 54, no. 2 (2020): 485-520.

Jackson, Bernard S. "Judicial review and the rule of law." Cambridge Law Journal 45, no. 3 (1986): 508-535.

Kaminski, Margot E., and James R. Hagy. "Comparative constitutional law." Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2 (2006): 21-44.

Kleinig, John. "Criminal procedure and the pursuit of justice." Criminal Justice Ethics 1, no. 1 (1982): 11-30.

Langbein, John H. "Torture and the law of proof: Europe and England in the Ancien Regime." The University of Chicago Law Review 49, no. 1 (1982): 1-136.

Langbein, John H. "The criminal trial before the lawyers." University of Chicago Law Review 45, no. 2 (1978): 263-316.

McCormick, Charles T. "A handbook on the Law of Evidence." West Publishing Co., 1972.

Oberholzer-Gee, Felix, and Koleman Strumpf. "Endogenous enforcement institutions." Journal of Political Economy 113, no. 2 (2005): 461-487.

Penner, James E., Emmanuel Melissaris, and Lucia Zedner. Principles of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Posner, Richard A. "Judicial independence in international tribunals." American Journal of International Law 95, no. 4 (2001): 869-877.

Roberts, Julian V., and Regulus Zemel. "Safeguarding justice through oversight: a review of judicial oversight mechanisms." Journal of Law and Society 47, no. 1 (2020): 108-131.

Shavell, Steven. "Economic analysis of public law enforcement and criminal law." Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, no. 1 (1996): 43-64.

Tankebe, Justice. "Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy." Criminology 46, no. 4 (2008): 1039-1074.

Tushnet, Mark V. "Judicial review in comparative law." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 30, no. 2 (1997): 305-330.

Zander, Michael. "On judicial independence." Cambridge Law Journal 63, no. 3 (2004): 601-629.