ASSESSING JUDGE'S ROLE IN DIVERTING SERIOUS OFFENDERS: PROGRESSIVITY IN JUVENILE CASES WITH 7+ YEAR IMPRISONMENT POTENTIAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: The primary objective of this research is to investigate and analyze discrepancies in the application of diversion requirements, with a specific focus on juvenile offenders facing potential imprisonment sentences exceeding 7 years.
Theoretical Framework: The theoretical conception of this research centers on the idea of restorative justice and rehabilitation. It assumes that young offenders, due to their age and potential for change, should be diverted away from traditional punitive measures like imprisonment. Instead, diversion programs aim to address the root causes of delinquency, provide support and guidance, and involve the juvenile in repairing harm caused to victims and the community. This approach is grounded in the belief that intervention and redirection can prevent further criminal behavior, foster personal growth, and ultimately benefit both the young offender and society by promoting reintegration and minimizing recidivism.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research adopts a dual-method approach, combining normative and empirical methodologies. The research employs descriptive research methods to examine how the judiciary handles cases involving minors eligible for diversion under the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2014 and Article 5 paragraph (1) of the Judicial Power Act.
Findings: The study's findings emphasize the need for the judiciary to embrace a broader concept of justice within the societal context. While legal certainty remains important, the research reveals the significance of societal fairness in the implementation of diversion programs. It highlights the gap between strict legal requirements and the principles of social justice, which should be addressed to facilitate more effective diversion processes.
Research, Practical & Social Implications: This research holds several implications. Firstly, it underscores the importance of aligning judicial practices with the evolving dynamics of society. Practical implications include the recommendation for legal reforms, particularly within the framework of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, to adapt to changing community needs. This may involve revising the criteria for criminal acts eligible for diversion, allowing the justice system to better serve the interests of both minors and society at large.
Originality/Value: This study contributes original insights by shedding light on the divergence between legal norms and the concept of social justice, especially in the context of diversion for juvenile offenders. It emphasizes the necessity for legal reforms to ensure that the justice system remains responsive to the evolving needs and expectations of the community. Ultimately, the research highlights the importance of harmonizing legal requirements with broader societal values for the benefit of juvenile offenders and society as a whole.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ali, Z. (2006). Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Asshiddiqie, J & Safa’at, M. A. (2006). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum Murni. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal & Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Barua, U., & Hossain, M. B. (2022). Patriarchy and the Rights of Rape Victims: Law and Practice. Lex Publica, 9(1), 79-93.
Ferdiles, L. (2019). Reformasi Hukum dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Pidana Nasional. Lex Publica, 6(1), 25-31.
Friedman, W. (1994). Legal Theory: diterjemahkan oleh Muhammad Arifin Teori dan Filsafat Hukum-Idealisme Filosofis dan Problema Keadilan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Goffman, E. (2009). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon and schuster.
Harahap, M. Y.(2012). Pembahasan Supreme Court Regulationsalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hossain, M. B. (2020). Compliance of the Bangladesh Legal Policies with the ILO Convention on the Prohibition of Child Labor. Lex Publica, 7(2), 15-23.
Mahfud, M. D. (2012). Membangun Politik Hukum. Menegakkan Konstitusi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Marbun, S. F. (2011). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Adminitratif di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Mertokusumo. S. (2010). Penemuan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.
Mertokusumo. S. (2019). Teori Hukum. Yogyakarta: Maha Karya Pustaka.
Mulyadi, D. L. (2014). Wajah Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Nurdin, B., & Turdiev, K. (2021). Paradigm of Justice in Law Enforcement in the Philosophical Dimensions of Legal Positivism and Legal Realism. Lex Publica, 8(2), 65-74.
Radbruch, G. (1947). Vorschüle der Rechtsphilosophie. Heidelberg: Verlag Scherer.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
Saptomo, A. (2019). The Accommodation of Social and Cultural Forces in the Decision-making Process by Judges In Indonesia. Lex Publica, 6(1), 18-24.
Sellner, A. (2007). Latein im Alltag. Wiesbaden: Vma-Verlag.
Soepomo. (1983). Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Pusaka.
Supaat, D. I. (2022). Restorative Justice for Juvenile Drugs Use in Indonesian Court: A Criminological Approach. Lex Publica, 9(1), 94-110.
Syarifuddin, M. (2021). Legal Heuristic Approach in Judicial Practice. Lex Publica, 8(2)
Wati, L., Bajari, A., Wahyudin, U., & Koswara, I. (2023). Unraveling Communication Barriers in Preventing Sexual Violence Against Children: A Case Study of the Patbm Program in Tangerang City Amidst the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(4), e684.
Yanto, O. (2020). Criminal Charges and Sanctions on Defamation Crime as Cyber Crime in the Information Technology Development. Lex Publica, 7(2), 24-43.
Zulkarnain, Rosidah, N., & Siswanto, H. (2023). Strategies for Committing Narcotics Abuse by Children Through Community Policing. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3), e487.