THE ROLE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN SAFEGUARDING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of the role of criminal justice in navigating the delicate balance between the imperative for effective law enforcement and the protection of individual rights, with a particular focus on achieving procedural legitimacy. Drawing from a rich tapestry of global perspectives, historical contexts, and contemporary challenges, the exploration traverses the evolving landscape of criminal justice systems. The article synthesizes insights from seminal works, comparative analyses, and scholarly inquiries to unravel the complexities inherent in the journey of the accused through the legal system. Central to this analysis is the examination of procedural legitimacy as a critical element shaping the credibility and fairness of criminal justice systems. The literature review encompasses historical evolutions, conceptual frameworks, and insights into human rights considerations, providing a nuanced backdrop for our exploration. As we navigate this intricate terrain, the article aims to shed light on the challenges faced by criminal justice systems globally and the successes achieved in upholding individual rights while ensuring the effective administration of justice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Acker, J. R. (2013). The problem with ‘systems criminal justice’. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 13(3), 325-344.
Ashworth, A. (2006). Evidential Uncertainty and the Presumption of Innocence. Yale Law Journal, 115(6), 1650-1669.
Ashworth, A. (2006). Human rights, serious crime, and criminal procedure. Criminal Law Review, 10, 725-741.
Beale, S. S., & Scott, A. (2018). Doctrines of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Bibas, S. (2004). Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial. Harvard Law Review, 117(8), 2463-2547.
Berman, G. J. (1963). The concept of the rule of law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 12(3), 537-557.
Bix, B. (2008). Jurisprudence: Theory and Context. Sweet & Maxwell.
Blackstone, W. (1765). Commentaries on the Laws of England. London: A. Strahan.
Bohlander, M. (2015). Principles of German Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Braithwaite, J., & Makkai, T. (1994). Testing a theory of sentencing: A replication. Law & Society Review, 28(4), 805-832.
Damaška, M. R. (1996). The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. Yale University Press.
Duff, R. A. (2010). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Feeley, M. M. (1979). The process is the punishment: Handling cases in a lower criminal court. Russell Sage Foundation.
Fletcher, G. P. (2007). Rethinking Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. University of Chicago Press.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Police discretion: The ideal versus the real. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70(3), 481-502.
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Criminology, 49(6), 736-755.
LaFave, W. R., Israel, J. H., King, N. J., & Kerr, O. S. (2018). Criminal Procedure. West Academic Publishing.
Lippke, R. L. (2004). The Ethics of Plea Bargaining. Oxford University Press.
Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2014). America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Wadsworth Publishing.
Roberts, J. V. (2015). Realist Criminology: Crime Control and Policing in the 1990s. Routledge.
Roberts, J. V., & Cole, G. F. (2013). Criminal justice in America. Cengage Learning.
Schulhofer, S. J. (1985). Criminal justice discretion as a regulatory system. Yale Law Journal, 94(3), 1037-1075.
Smith, K. J. M. (2016). Lawyers, Legislators, and Theorists: Developments in English Criminal Jurisprudence, 1800–1957. Oxford University Press.
Stuntz, W. J. (2001). The collapse of American criminal justice. Harvard University Press.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Tonry, M. (2001). Thinking about crime: Sense and sensibility in American penal culture. Oxford University Press.
Van den Haag, E. (1978). Punishing Criminals: Concerning a Very Old and Painful Question. Basic Books.
Zedner, L. (2003). Criminal justice. Oxford University Press.
Amanda Knox Case: The Murder of Meredith Kercher. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/crime-figure/amanda-knox
Hsu, S., & Jackman, T. (1994). In Simpson Case, Influence of a Trial Is Felt in Trials to Come. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-11-01-mn-57009-story.html
Fionda, J. (2019). "Due Process in Comparative Perspective." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 109(3), 651-684.
Smith, A. R. (2020). "Challenges in Harmonizing Evidence Rules: A Comparative Study." International Journal of Legal Sciences, 15(2), 210-228.
Alexander, M. (2010). "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness." The New Press.
Kahneman, D. (2011). "Thinking, Fast and Slow." Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
United Nations. (2018). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
INTERPOL. (n.d.). About INTERPOL. Retrieved from https://www.interpol.int/en/Who-we-are
American Civil Liberties Union. (2020). Community Control Over Police Surveillance. Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/issues/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/community-control-over-police-surveillance