NEUROTECHNOLOGY AND THE LAW: LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRIVACY, AUTONOMY, AND LIABILITY
Main Article Content
Abstract
The lightning-fast advancements in neurotechnology offer unparalleled potential for treating neurological disorders and enhancing cognitive abilities. However, these breakthroughs come with major legal and ethical dilemmas that demand prompt and responsible attention. The research problem of this article is identifying and addressing the legal considerations surrounding the use of neurotechnology, particularly with regard to privacy, autonomy, and liability. The article is structured into five major sections, which delve into the evolution of neurotechnology, the expanding applications of neurotechnology, the future of privacy in a neurotechnological world, ethical concerns related to neurotechnology's impact on personal autonomy, and liability considerations in the advancement of neurotechnology. Through adopting a qualitative, analytical and interdisciplinary method, the conclusion of the study emphasizes the significance and potential of neurotechnology in treating chronic diseases, while underscoring the urgent need for a comprehensive legal framework to safeguard individuals' rights.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Agarwal, Anisha, Rafael Dowsley, Nicholas D. McKinney, Dongrui Wu, Chin-Teng Lin, Martine De Cock, and Anderson CA Nascimento. “Protecting privacy of users in brain-computer interface applications.” [2019, 27, No. 8] IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 27.
Al-Douri H, Ahmed Mohammed, “The Impact of Technological Developments on the Right to Privacy,” [2022, 11, No. 42], Journal of College of Law for Legal and Political Sciences.
DeVries W Thomas, “Protecting Privacy in the Digital Age,” [2003, 18], Berkeley Tech. LJ.
Farah, Martha J. “An Ethics Toolbox for Neurotechnology,” 86, no. 1 [2015, 86, No.1], Neuron.
Friston K J., “Modalities, Modes, and Models in Functional Neuroimaging,” [2009, 326, No. 5951] Science.
Johnson W G., “Catching up with Convergence: Strategies for Bringing Together the Fragmented Regulatory Governance of Brain-Machine Interfaces in the United States” [2021, 30, No. 1], Annals of Health Law.
Kellmeyer P, et al, “The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems,” 25, no. 4 [2016, 25, No. 4].
Ligthart S, “Coercive Neuroimaging, Criminal Law, and Privacy: a European Perspective,” [2019, 6, No. 1], Journal of Law and the Biosciences.
Liv, N. “Neurolaw: Brain-Computer Interfaces,” [2021, 13, No. 1], Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy.
M, B Diana, et al, “The Neurotechnology and Society Interface: Responsible Innovation in an International Context” [2018, 5, No, 1] Journal of Responsible Innovation.
Montalbano L, “Brain-Machine Interfaces and Ethics: A Transition from Wearable to Implantable,” [2021, No. 16].
Müller O, Rotter Stefan, “Neurotechnology: Current Developments and Ethical Issues” [2017, 11, 93], Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience.
Naz, N Samar, Kinza Sardar, Urooj Asghar, Mehjabeen, and Ali Raza. "Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer Interface." [2018, 18, No. 5] International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security.
Poldrack R A., “Can Cognitive Processes be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?” [2006, 10, No. 2] Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Scangos, K W., Ankit N. Khambhati, Patrick M. Daly, Ghassan S. Makhoul, Leo P. Sugrue, Hashem Zamanian, Tony X. Liu et al. “Closed-loop Neuromodulation in an Individual with Treatment-resistant Depression.” 27, no. 10 (2021, 27, No. 10), Nature Medicine.
Smits, J M. “Does the Law of Delict have a Future? On Neuroscience and Liability” [2015, 17].
Snead O. Carter, “Neuroimaging and Capital Punishment,” [2008, 19], The New Atlantis.
Yuste R, Genser J, Herrmann S, “It’s Time for Neuro-Rights,” [2021, 18], Horizons.
Yuste, R, Sara Goering, Blaise Agüera Y. Arcas, Guoqiang Bi, Jose M. Carmena, Adrian Carter, Joseph J. Fins et al, “Four Ethical Priorities for Neurotechnologies and AI,” [2017, 551, No. 7679], Nature 551, no. 7679.