JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE FORMATION OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURAL SECTOR IN LAW NUMBER 6 OF 2023 CONCERNING THE STIPULATION OF GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS INSTEAD OF LAW NUMBER 2 2022 CONCERNING JOB CREATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF GOOD GOVERNANCE

Main Article Content

DEMSON TIOPAN, RAHEL OCTORA, BENEDIKTUS HESTUCIPTO HANDOYO

Abstract

Indonesia is an agricultural country with its biodiversity. As an agricultural country, Indonesia can meet the community’s food needs. The state must achieve the general welfare as stipulated in the constitution. It is noted that regulations in agriculture are spread across various laws and regulations. The results showed that the establishment of the Job Creation Law was considered contrary to the general principles of good governance such as the principle of legal certainty, prudence, not abusing interests, and openness. The Job Creation Law formed using  theomnibus law approach method  is also considered less representative of the principle of expediency in terms of formal aspects. The Job Creation Law has substantially changed various main provisions of laws and regulations in agriculture. These changes have an impact on the welfare of farmers. This condition makes the Job Creation Law considered unable to achieve public welfare and does not reflect the value of legal expediency. The advice for the government is to always base on the general principles of good governance when forming laws and review the substances of regulations in agriculture so that they are more directed towards the welfare of farmers.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

DEMSON TIOPAN, RAHEL OCTORA, BENEDIKTUS HESTUCIPTO HANDOYO

DEMSONTIOPANA, RAHEL OCTORAA, BENEDIKTUS HESTUCIPTO HANDOYOB

demson.tiopan@maranatha.edu, octorael@gmail.com, ben.hestu@gmail.com.

a Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Jawa Barat, Kota Bandung, 41063, Indonesia

bUniversitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta Special Region, 55281, Indonesia

References

Soehino, Ilmu Negara, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2000.

MahkamahKonstitusi, “MK: InkonstitusionalBersyarat, UU Cipta Kerja Harus DiperbaikidalamJangka Waktu Dua Tahun”, https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=17816, diakses pada tanggal 3 Februrari 2023.

Humas, “PemerintahTerbitkanPerppu Cipta Kerja”, https://setkab.go.id/pemerintah-terbitkan-Perppu-cipta-kerja/, diakses pada tanggal 3 Februrari 2023.

J. Ibrahim, Teori dan MetodologiPenelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2007.

S. Soekanto, PengantarPenelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 1986.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: KencanaPrenada Media Group, 2008.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Airlangga, “PemerintahTerbitkanPerppu No 2/2022 Pengganti UU Cipta Kerja, Ini Pokok-PokokIsinya”, https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/pemerintah-terbitkan-Perppu-no-22022-pengganti-uu-cipta-kerja-ini-pokok-pokok-isinya, diakses pada tanggal 10 Mei 2023.

Bledsoe, Robert L & Boczek, Boleslaw A .1987. The International Law Dictionary.Oxford : Clio Press.

L. Anna Marpaung, Ilmu Negara, Penerbit Andi, 2018.

D. F. Kettl, The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century, Public Administration Review, 60 (6), 509-519.

M. Azhar, Relevansi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik

J. Girsang, et. al, Kepastian Hukum Merek TigaDimensi dan Desain Industri: Studi Perbandingan Hukum di Indonesia, Amerika, dan Australia, University of Bengkulu Law Journal, 6 (1) (2021) 60-81.

H.Siallagan, PenerapanPrinsip Negara Hukum di Indonesia, Sosiohumaniora, 18 (2) (2016) 131 - 137 https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9947

T. Wardiyah & A. Fauzi, Peran Kekuasaan Absolut dalamBirokrasiAparatKepolisian, SOSIOLOGI: JurnalIlmiah Kajian IlmuSosial dan Budaya, 25 (1), 2023, 89-107, https://doi.org/10.23960/sosiologi.v25i1.531

Supriyadi, A. Intan Purnamasari, GagasanPenggunaan Metode Omnibus Law dalamPembentukanPeraturan Daerah, 15 (2), 2021, 257-270, http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.V15.257-270

E. P. Widiati, Local Legislative Drafting in The Unitary States: A Comparison Between Indonesia and Philiphines, Yuridika, 28 (3), 2013, 305.

N. Lathif, Teori Hukum Sebagai Sarana / Alat untukMemperbaharuiatauMerekayasa Masyarakat, Pakuan Law Review, 3 (1), 2017, 73-94.

A. Suryono, Kebijakan Publik UntukKesejahteraan Rakyat, TRANSPARANSI: JurnalIlmiahIlmuAdministrasi, 6 (2), (2014),98-102.

L. Arliman, Partisipasi Masyarakat dalamPembentukanPerundang-undanganuntukMewujudkan Negara Kesejahteraan Indonesia, JurnalPolitikPemerintahan, 10 (1), (2017), 59-72.

D. Nurtika& M. Taufiqurrahman, KemutlakanMoralitas Dalam Hukum: Studi Tentang Teori Gustav Radbruch, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 26 (4), 2019, 447-468.