ANALYZING THE ESCALATING ECONOMIC DISPARITIES IN ENGAGING NON-TECHNOCRATS WITHIN THE TECHNOCRATIC PARADIGM
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper delves into the intricate dynamics of technocrats' influence on economic decision-making worldwide and their potential unintended ramifications. As policymakers increasingly turn to technocrats for their specialised knowledge, it is crucial to examine the consequences of their economic management approach. Through an extensive review of literature and analysis of case studies, this study investigates the correlation between technocratic-driven economies and the expanding disparities in accessibility to non-technocrats. The findings indicate that the escalating dependence on technocratic solutions for economic challenges can intensify the socio-economic divide between experts and the public. This research sheds light on the implications of technocratic dominance in economic decision-making, emphasising the need for comprehensive understanding of its effects on societal cohesion and equality.
Introduction:
Technocrats are highly skilled professionals who possess expertise in their respective fields, making them valuable resources in the realm of policymaking. Their approach is rooted in empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and a steadfast commitment to achieving efficiency. As a result, technocrats often devise solutions that are perceived as more effective when compared to those derived from political negotiations or public discourse. Nevertheless, the increasing reliance on technocratic solutions has recently attracted critical examination, with concerns raised about the potential exacerbation of the gap between experts and the public.
This research paper aims to delve into the intricate relationship between the economic decisions made by technocrats and the disparities that arise in engaging non-technocrats. Specifically, it will focus on exploring the unintended consequences that emerge from technocratic decision-making processes. By scrutinizing these consequences, the study seeks to shed light on the broader implications and impacts of technocratic governance on societal dynamics. This paper will adopt a scientific and technical approach to comprehensively analyze the intricate dynamics at play. It will draw upon an array of empirical data, scholarly articles, and case studies to build a robust foundation for the investigation. The methodology employed will involve a combination of quantitative analysis and qualitative assessment, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted aspects surrounding the issue.
Through the examination of pertinent literature, the paper will elucidate the potential implications of technocratic decision-making on public perceptions, participation, and trust in the policymaking process. Additionally, it will explore the potential ramifications on democratic governance and societal cohesion.
By undertaking this research, the aim is to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on technocracy, thus facilitating informed discussions and debates on the subject. Furthermore, it is hoped that the findings will assist policymakers, scholars, and society at large in critically evaluating the role of technocrats in shaping policies and ensuring the inclusivity of decision-making processes.
In conclusion, this research paper will provide a scientifically and technically elaborate analysis of the relationship between the economy of technocrats and the disparities in outreach to non-technocrats. By examining the unintended consequences of technocratic decision-making, the study seeks to deepen our understanding of the complexities surrounding this issue and foster dialogue on its implications for democratic governance and societal cohesion.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Tax effect of digital economy development in China: The policy effect and transmission mechanism
Authors :Jun MaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics，Hainan Normal University，Haikou 571158，China,Jian-min LiuSchool of Economy and Trade，Hunan University, Changsha 410079, China,ZhiyuanLiuCarey Business School, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
2.He Z., Zhang X., Wan G. (2020). Digital finance, digital divide and multidimensional poverty. Statistical Research, 37 (10): 79-89
3.Deng, F., Li, H., Yang, M., Zhao, W., Gai, Z., Guo, Y., ... & Wu, H. (2021). On the nonlinear relationship between energy consumption and economic and social development: evidence from Henan Province, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 33192-33207
4.Qi H., Cao X., Liu Y. (2020). The impact of digital economy on corporate governance -- based on the perspective of information asymmetry and managers' irrational behaviour. Reform, 2020 (4): 50-64
5.Ministries matter: technocrats and regime loyalty under autocracyPublished online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2023Erin York
6. Yang Q. (2020).The impact of digital economy on the transformation of tax governance and countermeasures -- based on the perspective of political economics and governance theory analysis. Tax Research, 2020 (10): 56-62
7.Yang X., Han L. (2017). Reflection on the division of tax jurisdiction in the context of digital economy -- based on the perspective of value creation .Tax Research, (12): 53-56
8.Zhang X., Wan G., Zhang J., He Z.(2019). Digital economy, inclusive finance and inclusive growth. Economic Research, 54 (8): 71-86
9.Zhao T., Zhang Z., & Liang S. (2020). Digital economy, entrepreneurial activity and high-quality development Managing the World, (10)
10.Bell, DA (2016) The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Blaydes, L (2010) Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak's Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Camerlo, M and Pérez-Liñán, A (2015) The politics of minister retention in presidential systems: technocrats, partisans, and government approval. Comparative Politics 47, 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Costa Pinto, A, Cotto, M and Tavares de Almeida, P (2018) Technocratic Ministers andPoliticalLeadershipinEuropeanDemocracies. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-623139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dargent, E (2011) Agents or actors? Assessing the autonomy of economic technocrats in Colombia and Peru. Comparative Politics 43, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Darif, M (2012) Morocco: a reformist monarchy?. The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 3, 82–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.de Larramendi, MH and Tomé-Alonso, B (2017) The return of Morocco to the African union. IEMed Mediterranean Yearbook 2017.Google Scholar