CONTEMPT OF COURT CRIMINAL IN JUSTICE IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA

Abstract

The administration of Justice has a broader scope and scope than the context of the court itself because the scope of the court is a violation or insult aimed at the court, which is generally carried out in the courtroom. Court or during the trial, while the administration of Justice is carried out in court or the courtroom but can also occur outside the court. The method in this research is normative, where the study focuses on secondary data. The study results show that the provisions related to contempt of court punishment have basically been regulated in the qualification provisions of laws and regulations but are still regulated separately and partially in criminal laws and regulations. In addition, it is understood that the rules related to contempt of court punishment it does not yet regulate the form of punishment if law enforcers in the judicial environment, such as judges, investigators, and investigators, commit acts that humiliate the dignity, authority, and/or honor of the judiciary. So that special regulations needed to be related to the context of the court, where this is necessary as part of giving a warning that if you violate the rules of contention of court, criminal sanctions will be imposed on those who do it, as well as imparting knowledge, especially to law enforcement officials and the public that Justice has dignity. Which must be respected and preserved.