PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION BY THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE BASED ON AN INTEGRATED PREVENTIVE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA

Main Article Content

IDWIN SAPUTRA, MARONI, BUDIYONO, HS TISNANTA

Abstract

The implementation of corruption prevention is one of the successes of law enforcement officials, especially the Prosecutor's Office, because what happens to law enforcement carried out by the Prosecutor's Office is enforcement after a tipikor occurs; therefore, prevention is needed, which is driven by the Prosecutor's Office by strengthening and providing legality in accommodating the collaboration of preventive institutions based on the Integrated Preventive Criminal Justice System (IPCJS). This study focuses on the direction of legal policy for the prevention of corruption by the Prosecutor's Office and the prevention of corruption by the Prosecutor's Office based on an integrated preventive criminal justice system. The results of this study indicate that policy direction is implemented to strengthen the authority of the Prosecutor's Office in efforts to prevent corruption. Therefore, it needs to be strengthened by the existence of regulations that strictly regulate the authority of the Prosecutor’s Office to prevent criminal acts of corruption. With this regulation, the authority of the Prosecutor's Office can increase or even strengthen the existing one so that it can be included in the national strategy to prevent corruption. The prevention of corruption can be carried out by the Prosecutor's Office as a driving force in preventing corruption through an Integrated Preventive Criminal Justice System, especially against corruption. Together with the BPK and the Police, it will become an integrated institution for prevention.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

IDWIN SAPUTRA, MARONI, BUDIYONO, HS TISNANTA

IDWIN SAPUTRA, MARONI, BUDIYONO, HS TISNANTA

Doctoral Program of Law - Universitas Lampung

Lecturers of Law School - Universitas Lampung

References

Anak Agung Gede Juniran, Dkk. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Upaya Asset Recovery Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi ( Studi Kasus Di Kejaksaan Tinggi Bali ).” Universitas Udayana Bali, 2014.

Arief, B. N. (2015). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana,

Bhakti, A. E. (2017). Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Peran Serta Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah.

Delia Ferreira Rubio. 2018. makin lemah demokrasi, makin tinggi korupsi. Diakses tanggal 23 April 2020, dari https://www.dw.com/id/transparency-international-makin-lemah-demokrasi-makin-tinggi-korupsi/a-47273914, diakses pada tanggal 21 Mei 2021.

Eri Satrianaa, Dewi Kania Sugihartib & Muhammad Ilham Satrianac. “System, Asset Recovery of Detrimental to The Finances of The State From Proceeds of Corruption in The Development of National Criminal Law.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 19, no. 2 (2015): 350–69. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.2.

Fitrahady, Khairus Febryan, Ahmad Zuhairi, dan M Riadhussyah. “REcovery Aset Daerah Yang Dijadikan Agunan oleh Pihak Ketika Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama dengan BUMD.” Arena Hukum 13, no. 3 (2020): 550–67.

Klitgaard, R. (1998). Membasmi Korupsi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Mahmud, Ade. “Problematika Asset Recovery Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Yudisial 11, no. 3 (2018): 347. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v11i3.262.

Redi Hendar Pakpahan dan Aras Firdaus. “Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Asset Recovery: Antara Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum.” Legalisasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2019): 269–378.

Rose-Ackerman, S. (2006). Korupsi Pemerintahan Sebab, Akibat, dan Reformasi. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Rosidi, A. (2006). Korupsi dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Rustam, Rustam. “PELAKSANAAN PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA (ASSET RECOVERY) DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kasus Kejaksaan Tinggi Sumatera Barat).” Jurnal Dimensi 6, no. 2 (2017): 206–25. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v6i2.1047.

Sharen, Sheiliyana. “Penegakan Hukum dalam Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagai Upaya Menyelamatkan Keuangan Negara Dihubungkan dengan Uu No . 31 Tahun 1999 Jo Uu No . 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” In Prosiding Ilmu Hukum, 133–36, 2001.

Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun. “Penanganan Pengembalian Aset Negara Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi dan Penerapan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 4 (2020): 587. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.587-604.