TENSION OVER THE MODEL OF CONTROL OF CONSTITUTIONALITY IN ECUADOR.

Main Article Content

CACPATA CALLE WILSON ALFREDO, GIL BETANCOURT ANTONELLA STEFANÍA

Abstract

The constitutionality control model applicable in each State must be clearly established by the constitutional norm or by the interpretation that the competent body may give. In Ecuador, from 1998 to 2008, a model of mixed control of constitutionality was undoubtedly applied. However, since its current Constitution, in force since October 20, 2008, there have been doubts about its control model, initially going through a concentrated one and trying to change to a mixed model and sometimes with the existence of a limited diffuse one. Given that, the present investigative work seeks to determine a suitable mechanism or way through which the Constitutional Court can issue a ruling with an erga omnes effect, which allows for the certainty of the constitutionality control model that exists in Ecuador. Using methods of the theoretical level of knowledge such as synthetic analytical and empirical such as documentary analysis. Concluding that the action of unconstitutionality is the ideal way that would allow the Constitutional Court to issue a ruling with erga omnes effect, on the model of constitutionality control that exists in Ecuador.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

CACPATA CALLE WILSON ALFREDO, GIL BETANCOURT ANTONELLA STEFANÍA

CACPATA CALLE WILSON ALFREDO1, GIL BETANCOURT ANTONELLA STEFANÍA2

Universidad Regional Autónoma de Los Andes Santo Domingo. Ecuador.

References

Organic Code of the Judicial Function. (June 26, 2019). Official Register Supplement 544 of 09-mar.-2009. Quito, Ecuador: Corporacion de Estudios y Publicaciones.

Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Constituent. (2019). Official Register 449. Montecristi: Official Register 449.

Political Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. (11 August 1998). Official Register 1. Sangolquí, Ecuador.

Gomez, R. (2022). El control constitucional en el Ecuador.Una aproximación teórica y filosófica. Law Review Forum, 122-144. Retrieved from National Autonomous University of Mexico: https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/6/2894/10.pdf

Grijalva, A. (2011). Constitutionalism in Ecuador. Quito: Centro de Estudios y Difusión del Derecho Consttitucional.

Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control. (2018). Official Register Supplement 52 of 22-Oct.-2009. Ecuador: Corporacion de Estudios y Publicaciones.

Ochoa, E. (2021). The direct application of the Constitution. Retrieved from the Repository of the Catholic University of Santiago de Guayaquil: http://201.159.223.180/bitstream/3317/17715/1/T-UCSG-POS-MDC-242.pdf

Oyarte, R. (2019). Constitutional law. Quito: Corporation of Studies and Publications.

Pinos, C. (October 20, 2022). VI International Congress of Constitutional Law.

Decision No. 055-10-SEP-CC, 0213-10-EP (Constitutional Court of Ecuador, November 18, 2010).

Decision No. 001-13-SCN-CC., 0535-12-CN (Constitutional Court of Ecuador, February 6, 2013).

Decision No. 184-18-SEP-CC., 1692-12-EP (Constitutional Court of Ecuador May 29, 2018).

Decision No. 11-18-CN/19, 11-18-CN (Constitutional Court of Ecuador June 12, 2019).

Decision No. 1116-13-EP/20, 1116-13-EP (Constitutional Court of Ecuador November 18, 2020).

Decision No. 36-19-IN/21, 36-19-IN (Constitutional Court of Ecuador September 22, 2021).

Decision No. 1644-14-EP/21, 1644-14-EP (Constitutional Court of Ecuador June 02, 2021).