MEDIATION IN COERCIVE JURISDICTION PROCESSES.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Throughout history, the solution of controversies has been submitted to judges and courts, through procedures established in accordance with the principle of access to justice, at the same time alternative methods have been incorporated for the solution of conflicts, detached from the ordinary justice, but effectively enforceable in this way, protected by the legal effect they hold, providing the citizen with quick and effective options for their disputes. In this virtue, the present scientific work has been elaborated in order to determine if this procedure that is constitutionally protected can be applied in the coercive jurisdiction, for which an investigation with a qualitative approach has been used, cross-sectional with the use of the methods of historical-logical research, analytical synthetic, and documentary review with the review of several legal and doctrinal texts that have allowed to obtain as a result that mediation is a mechanism that can be perfectly applied in coercive processes since it does not affect the procedures of public institutions and their faculty of administrative self-management, but rather opens up a range of possibilities that benefit both the Administration and the citizens.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ecuador, National Assembly of the. Code of Civil Procedure. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones, 2011.
ECUADOR, NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF THE. Organic Administrative Code. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publcaciones, 2017.
Ecuador, National Assembly of the. Constitution of Ecuador. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones, 2008.
Ecuador, National Congress of. Arbitration and Mediation Law. Quito: Corporación de Estudios y Publicaciones, 2006.
Flores, J. "La desconfianza en los sistemas de imparting Mexican justice, prospection and evaluation from the perspective of Conflict Analysis Tipology (CAT)." International Journal of Scientific Research and Practice at MSC, 2021: 7.
Galindo, A. «Origen y desarrollo de la Solución Alternativa de Solución de Conflictos en el Ecuador.» Ibero-American Network, 2001: 90.
González, E. "The importance of Mediation to solve conflicts in Panama." Sapientia, 2021: 22.
Gonzalez, M. "What is mediation." Tebar Flores, 2018: 8.
Loza, A. "Violation of the right to defense of persons and due process in trials of coercive jurisdiction in art. 968 of the Code of Civil Procedure.' Digital Visionary, 2019: 7.
Mejía, A. «EVOLUCIÓN HISTÓRICA DE LA ORALIDAD Y LA ESCRITURA EN EL PROCESO CIVIL ESPAÑOL Y ECUATORIANO.» Ius Humani, 2017: 16-18.
Moreno, R. «El modelo garantista de Luigi Ferrajoli. General Guidelines." Scielo, 2007.
Parra, O. «The Administrative Process of coercive collection.» Grupo Editorial Nueva Legislación SAS, 2010: 22.
Quiroga, M. «Alternative methods of conflict resolution; multidisciplinary perspective." Dikinson, 2015: 152.
Republic, Presidency of the. Organic Law of Public Companies, Loep. 2009: Corporation of Studies and Publications, Quito.
Républica, Presidency of the. ORGANIC LAW FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY. Quito: Corporation of Studies and Publications, 2021.
Republic, Presidency of the. Regulation to the Law on Arbitration and Mediation. Quito: Official Register, 2021.
Soasti, G. «Memoria de la Administración de Justicia en el Ecuador 1563 - 2017.» National Court of Justice of Ecuador, 2017: 117.