HARMFULNESS IN ECUADORIAN LEGISLATION.
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the legal system of Ecuador, the revocation of favorable administrative acts is established, which has two phases; the first, which is the declaration that the administrative act is harmful, carried out by the public administration, and the second, which refers to the presentation of the action of harmfulness in the District Court of Contentious Administrative Matters, that is, with the application of the legal figure that doctrinally has been called harmfulness. In the present investigation, a doctrinal and normative study is carried out regarding administrative acts which cannot be declared null by the administration, and their revocation must be applied, when they are legitimate acts or acts with valid vices; and the analysis of the application of harmfulness in a casuistry is presented. In the development of the research, the qualitative method is applied because it allows the documentary, doctrinal and normative analysis of the topic raised.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
National Constituent Assembly. (2008). Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. Montecristi, Manabí: Official Register No. 449. Retrieved from https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/index.php/registro-oficial web/publications/registrooficial/item/4864-registro-oficial-no-449
National Assembly Republic of Ecuador. (2015). General Organic Code of Processes. Quito: Official Register Supplement 506 Reformed. Retrieved from https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/index.php/registro-oficial-web/publicaciones/suplementos/item/2104-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-506
National Assembly Republic of Ecuador. (2017). Organic Administrative Code. Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador: Official Register Second Supplement No. 31. Retrieved from https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/index.php/registro-oficial-web/publicaciones/suplementos/item/9358-segundo-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-31
Cassagne, J. C. (2018). The Great Principles of Public Law. Bogotá: Temis.
Dromi, R. J. (1979). Journal of Public Administration No 88. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1059162
Ecuador. National Assembly of Ecuador. (2017). Organic Administrative Code. Official Register N. 31. Retrieved from https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/index.php/registro-oficial-web/publicaciones/suplementos/item/9358-segundo-suplemento-al-registro-oficial-no-31
Fernandez, J. (2016). Administrative law. Mexico : Institute of Legal Research.
Galindo, J. C. (2006). Lessons in Administrative Procedural Law, Vol. 2. Bogotá: Javeriana Cultural Foundation.
Gordillo, A. (2017). Treatise on Administrative Law (Eighth ed., Vol. III). Argentina: Fundación del Derecho Administrativo.
Jéze, G. (2017). Public services and administrative contracts. Mexico: University Law.
Marcheco, B. (2018). Fundamentals of Administrative Justice. Guayaquil: Unijuris.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Human Mobility. (May 13, 2019). Official Register N. 486. Retrieved from Resolution No. 0000042: https://www.registroficial.gob.ec/index.php/registro-oficial-web/publicaciones/registro-oficial/item/11634-registro-oficial-no-486
Mora, E., & Rivera, A. (2019). Administrative Law and Administrative Procedure. Bogotá: Leyer.
Moreta, A. (2019). Administrative and Sanctioning Procedure. Quito : Ediciones Continente.
Ortega, L. (2018). The administrative act in the processes and procedures. Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia.
Perez, E. (2020). Manual of Administrative Law. Corporation of Studies and Publications.
Sánchez, M., & Chamba, D. (2019). The administrative act in the Organic Administrative Code. Loja: South academi.