CRIMINAL ACTION OF ABUSE AUTHORITY PERFORMED BY POLRI (STUDY OF THE PREMEDITATED MURDER CASE OF BRIGADIER J)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study's objective is to describe the various criminal acts of authority abuse that are frequently committed by police officers and the possibility of authority by judges related to the disclosure of the case of the death of Brigadier J who is a member of the police. This study employs an empirical legal approach to data collection in the library. The results of the study found that there was a violation of government administrative arrangements in Law No. 30 of 2014 that indicate that authority was abused by FS as the head of the provincial administration against his subordinate Brigadier J who also dragged a number of other police officers. In this case, it was found that there was an attempt to obstruct the law enforcement process or an obstruction of justice. In addition, there is the potential for a fair trial or unfair access to legal justice for those involved in the assassination of Brigadier J. In conducting the trial, the judge has the potential to take several actions that are actually criminal acts, such as: a. Judges receive rewards (bribes). b. embezzlement of evidence c. violation of arrest and detention procedures and the determination of sentences. Thus, it is also hoped that the disclosure of this case clearly and with the maximum penalty can create a deterrent effect on other officials in violating the professional code of ethics or abusing office authority.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Penyalahgunaan wewenang
Warsito, H. U. (2005). Hukum kepolisian di Indonesia, Prestasi Pustaka, Jakarta.
Wiryono, P. (2002). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Abdussalam. (2007). Hukum Kepolisian Sebagai Hukum Positif dalam disiplin Hukum,Jakarta.
Adami, C. (2002). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Bagian 1, Grafindo, Jakarta.
Anton, T. (2004). Reformasi Kepolisian, Cetakan Kedua, Klaten : Sahabat.
B.Simanjuntak, Hukum Acara Pidana dan Tindak Pidana, Tarsito, Bandung.
Baharuddin L. (2000) Kejahatan Korupsi dan Penegakkan Hukum; Penerbit Buku Kompas; Jakarta.
Bambang. P. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.
C.S.T. Kansil . (2004). Pokok-pokok Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.
Dikdik M. Arief Mansur dan Elisatris Gultom. (2007). Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma dan Realita, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Hari. S, dan Lily, R. (2003). Hukum Pembuktian Dalam PerkaraPidana, Bandung, Mandar Maju.
Leden, M. (2005). dalam Asas-Teori-Praktek Hukum Pidana, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Harahap, M.Y. (2004). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP,Ed. Kedua,Cet. keempat, Jakarta,Sinar Grafika.
Moeljatno. (1993). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta, Bina Aksara.
Pasal 338 KUHP, Tindak pembunuhan berencana
Pasal 340 KUHP, Tindak pembunuhan berencana
Pasal 55 KUHP, Tindak pembunuhan berencana
Pasal 56 KUHP, Tindak pembunuhan berencana
Sadjijono. (2005). Fungsi Kepolisian dalam Pelaksanaan Good Governance, Yogyakarta, Laksabang Mediatama.
Satjipto, R. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Suatu Tinjauan Sosiologis, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.
Sholeh. S, moral penegak hukum di indonesia,(pengacara, hakim, polisi, jaksa),
Soerjono, S. (1983). Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum dalam Kerangka Pembangunan di Indonesia, Uipres, Jakarta.
Sudarto. (1981). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung, Alumni.
Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang bersih dari Korupsi, Kolusi dan Nepotisme.
Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Indonesia, Jakarta, Eresco.