THE INFLUENCE OF INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP OF PRIMARY SCHOOL HEADS ON TEACHERS’ COMMITMENT IN MAURITIUS

Main Article Content

BELLE LOUIS JINOT, LUTTOO BIBI KHURSEED

Abstract

One of the leadership functions of the school head that impacts the core mission of the school – effective teaching and learning- is instructional leadership. Teacher commitment is an important element that contributes to effective teaching and learning and the school head is a determining factor in realizing this mission. Numerous studies have been done on instructional leadership and teacher commitment, yet not much is known about the perceptions of teachers and headmasters on the role of the headmaster as an instructional leader and how the latter's role impacts teacher commitment in the primary school context. The actual instructional practices of the school heads were also explored. A descriptive mixed research approach was used to explore this phenomenon in ten primary schools in the Educational Zone 3 of Mauritius. The cluster sampling technique was used; a survey was carried out among 150 primary school teachers and focus group interviews were conducted among teachers and headmasters. The findings of this research confirm previous empirical studies: primary school heads are perceived as doing visioning and goal setting; they build a positive school culture and support teachers and students to improve the teaching and learning process; they manage the school resources and empower others as well as encourage the professional development of teachers. This study recommends the creation of a collaborative platform that promotes a community of practice among teachers and school heads to enhance teacher commitment.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

BELLE LOUIS JINOT, LUTTOO BIBI KHURSEED

  1. BELLE LOUIS JINOT1, LUTTOO BIBI KHURSEED2

1Open University of Mauritius, Mauritius

2Ministry of Education, Tertiary Education, Science and Technology, Mauritius

References

Aydin, A., Sarier, Y., & Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teachers' organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 806–811.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/11735

Chrispeels, J.H., Burke, P.H., Johnson, P., & Daly, A.J. (2008). Aligning mental models of the district and school leadership teams for reform coherence. Education and Urban Society, 28(6), 730-750.

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258.

Dudovskiy, J. (2016). The ultimate guide to writing a dissertation in Business Studies: A step-by-step assistance. E-Book Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6-16.

Education Act. (1957). Education. Republic of Mauritius: The Government Printer

Education Improvement Research Centre. (2022). Instructional Leadership: Leading the teaching and learning. Queensland: Department of Education.

Hallinger, P., & Heck. R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-95. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J.F. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 217-247.

Hitt, D.H., & Meyers, C.V. (2017). Successful principal facilitates vision and mission development amongst a capable and representative leadership team for students achievement. School Leadership & Management, 38(1), 4-31.

Ibrahim, M.S., & Wahab, J.A. (2012). Educational Leadership. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Leithwood, K. (2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012: with a discussion of the research foundations. The institute for education leadership. Available from: <http://iel.immix.ca/storage/6/1345688978/Final_Research_Report_-_EN.pdf> [24 March 2022].

Loeb, S., & Horng, E. (2010). New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(3), 66-69.

Murphy, J. (1988). Methodological, measurement, and conceptual problems in the study of instructional leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10(2), 117-139.

Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. Advances in Educational Administration, 1, 163-200.

Ng, F.S.D., Nguyen, T.D., Wong, K.B., & Choy, K.W. (2015). Instructional leadership practices in Singapore. School Leadership and Management, 35(4), 388-407.

Pont, B. (2014). School leadership: From practice to policy. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2(1), 4-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.447/ijelm.2014.07

Public Service Commission 2014, Scheme of service for headmasters. PSC Circular Note No 33 of 2014.

Punch, K.F., & Oancea, A. (2014). Introduction to research methods in education, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage, London.

Rehman, A., Khan, M.I., & Waheed, Z. (2019). School heads’ perceptions about their leadership styles. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1). 138-153.

Smith, C., & Amushigamo, A. (2016). The perceived influence of school leadership on learner behaviour in a Namibian secondary school. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 650-667.

Weber, J. (1996). Leading the instructional program in School leadership, eds. S Smith. & P Piele, Clearinghouse of Educational Management, Eugene, Oregon, pp. 253-278.

Wilhem, T. (2016). Not just striving, but thriving. Leadership, 45(4), 24-28.

Wilson, J. (2010). Essentials of business research: A guide to doing your research project. SAGE Publication

World Bank. (2017). Implementation of educational reform in Mauritius. Available from:<http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTAFRREGTOPEDUCATION/Resources/444659-1232743000972/Implementation_Education_Reform_Mauritius.pdf > [ 31 January 2023]