CONCEPT OF LEGAL PROTECTION AGAINST THE CREATORS OF PAINTING ARTS BASED ON THE PRINCIPLES OF DIGNIFIED JUSTICE
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study discusses the legal protection of the creator of a painting based on the principle of dignified justice. The method used in this research is the empirical juridical method. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the picture of legal protection for paintings at this time is still lacking, it can be seen from the number of cases that occurred but still at least touched by the law both in the form of compensation and criminal prosecution. The role of law enforcement is still lacking in dealing with violations of Copyright itself. These violations show that the public lacks awareness about the meaning of appreciating the work of others. In relation to copyright protection for works of art, paintings that are currently deemed inappropriate or inappropriate for the painters themselves. There is no understanding and there is no common interest between the government and the creators, especially the creators of paintings, namely painters.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Bernard Nainggolan, (2011), Pemberdayaan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif, Bandung: Alumni, hal. 319.
Betham, Jeremy. (1970). Of Laws in General, ed. by Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart (London: University of London, Athlone Press)
Campbell, Henry. (1991). Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of the Terms and Phrases of American and English Yurisprudence Ancient and Modern (United State of America: West Publishing Company)
Denny Kusmawan, (2014). “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Atas Buku”, Perspektif, Volume XIX No. 2 Tahun, hal. 142.
Kaino, Michihiro. (2009). ‗Bentham‘s Concept of Security in a Global Context: The Pannomion and the Public Opinion Tribunal as a Universal Plan‘, Journal of Bentham Studieshttps://doi.org/10.14324/111.2045-757x.033
Kesowo, Bambang. (1995). Pengantar Umum Mengenai Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia (Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada)
Mahfud, M. (2015). ‗Peran Dan Koordinasi Stakeholder Dalam Pengembangan Kawasan Minapolitan Di Kecamatan Nglegok, Kabupaten Blitar‘, Administrasi Publik Mahasiswa Universitas Brawijaya, 3.12
Muchsin, (2003), “Perlindungan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Investor di Indonesia”, Tesis, Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, hal. 14.
Prasetyo, Teguh. (2013a). Hukum Dan Sistem Hukum Berdasarkan Pancasila, Pertama (Yogyakarta: Media Perkasa)
———. (2015a). Keadilan Bermartabat Perspektif Teori Hukum, Pertama (Bandung: Nusa Media)
———. (2019b). Penelitian Hukum Suatu Perspektif Teori Keadilan Bermartabat, Pertama (Bandung: Nusa Media)
———. (2020b). Hukum Dan Teori Hukum, Pertama (Bandung: Nusa Media)
Satjipto Rahardjo, (2003), Sisi Sisi Lain dari Hukum Indonesia, Jakarta: Kompas, hal 121.
Setiono, (2004), “Rule of Law (Supermasi Hukum)”, Tesis. Surakarta: Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, hal.
Sudikno Mertokusumo,(2008). “Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat” dalam Artikel Hukum, Kamis, 20 Maret, http: //2. bp. blogspot. com/2008/03/meningkatkan-kesadaran-hukummasyarakat. html. Diakses pada tanggal 04 Mei 2016. Pukul 00. 35
Surya Prakash Sinha. (1993a). Jurisprudence Legal Philosophy in a Nutshell (St.Paul: West Publishing Company)
Suyud Margono, (2012), Prinsip Deklaratif Pendaftaran Hak Cipta: Kontradiksi Kaedah Pendaftaran Ciptaan Dengan Asas Kepemilikan Publikasi Pertama Kali, JurnalRechtsVinding, Vol 1 Nomor 2, hal. 251
Tim Lindsey, et. al, (2002), Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: Alumni, hal.
Treshna. (1959). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Disertai Pembahasan Beberapa Perbuatan Pidana Yang Penting (Bandung: Universitas Pajajaran)