HOW STATE ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM WORKS IN INDONESIA, THE NETHERLANDS, AND FRANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper provides a comparative legal study in terms of state administrative dispute settlement system in Indonesia, the Netherlands, and France. Selection of the three countries is based upon two primarily reasons namely 1) all the countries represent both developing and developed countries; and 3) the legal system of each country is typical as that of Indonesia is influenced by that of the Netherlands and France. This comparative legal research aims to explain similarities and differences between the state administrative dispute settlement system between Indonesia, Netherlands, and France. The data were collected from secondary sources in the forms of documents. Through qualitative analysis process, the results show that as for the similarity, both of them have the means of resolving the administrative disputes, both through administrative efforts and through the judiciary, and settlement through administrative efforts is taken before resolving disputes through the judiciary. As for the difference, the Netherlands does not have an Administrative Court as a judicial institution that is separate from the district court. Administrative dispute settlement is carried out by the administrative dispute chamber in the district court, while in France, the Administrative Court is one of the judicial environments under the Supreme Court, the Administrative Court in France is separate from the Supreme Court and is under the Conseil d'Etat.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ali, Muhammad Imran, ‘Comparative Legal Research-Building a Legal Attitude for a Transnational World’, Journal of Legal Studies “Vasile Goldiş”, 26/40 (2020), 66–80
Asseres, Girmaw Assemie, ‘New Public Management, Ethics, and Accountability: The Case of Addis Ababa City Administration, Ethiopia’ (2017)
Bárd, Petra, Sergio Carrera, Elspeth Guild, and Dimitry Kochenov, ‘An EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights’, CEPS Paper in Liberty and Security in Europe, 2016
Bercovitch, Jacob, Social Conflicts and Third Parties: Strategies of Conflict Resolution (2019)
Berge, Lucas van de, ‘The Rational Turn in Dutch Administrative Law’, Utrecht Law Review, 2022 <https://www.utrechtlawreview.org> [accessed 2 June 1BC]
Besselink, Leonard F M, ‘The National and EU Targets for Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Infringe the ECHR: The Judicial Review of General Policy Objectives: Hoge Raad (Netherlands Supreme Court) 20 December 2019, Urgenda v The State of the Netherlands’, European Constitutional Law Review, 18/1 (2022), 155–82
Bhatta, Gambhir, International Dictionary of Public Management and Governance (2015)
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna, ‘Dispute Settlement in the Ombudsman and the Court of Law Regarding Compensation in Public Service Dispute’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10/2 (2021), 277–99
Christensen, Tom, Per Lægreid, and Lise H Rykkja, ‘Organizing for Crisis Management: Building Governance Capacity and Legitimacy’, Public Administration Review, 76/6 (2016), 887–97
Cosens, Barbara A, Robin K Craig, Shana Lee Hirsch, Craig Anthony Tony Arnold, Melinda H Benson, Daniel A DeCaro, and others, ‘The Role of Law in Adaptive Governance’, Ecology and Society: A Journal of Integrative Science for Resilience and Sustainability, 22/1 (2017), 1
Craig, Paul, UK, EU and Global Administrative Law: Foundations and Challenges (2015)
Davidson, Nestor M, ‘Localist Administrative Law’, Yale Law Journal, 126/2 (2016)
Dodge, William S, ‘Investor-State Dispute Settlement between Developed Countries: Reflections on the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement’, Vand. J. Transnat’l L., 39 (2006), 1
Elpah, Dani, Philosophical, Juridical and Historical Review of Administrative Dispute Settlement, Including Disputes on State Civil Apparatuses after Administrative Efforts (2019)
Frederickson, H George, Kevin B Smith, Christopher W Larimer, and Michael J Licari, The Public Administration Theory Primer (2018)
Government of the Netherlabds, ‘Administration of Justice and Dispute Settlement’, 2022 <https://www.government.nl/topics/administration-of-justice-and-dispute-settlement> [accessed 2 June 1BC]
Held, Mateja, ‘The Development of the Administrative Court Systems in Transition Countries and Their Role in Democratic, Economic and Societal Transition’, Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave, 22/2 (2022), 209–36
Jacob, Marc, and Stephan W Schill, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Content, Practice, Method’, International Investment Law: A Handbook (Nomos/CH Beck/Hart: Baden-Baden/München/Oxford, 2015), 2015, 700–763
Kusdarini, Eny, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik Dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara (2020)
Lassche Advocaten, ‘Judicial System in the Netherlands’, 2022 <https://www.lassche.nl/en/court-system-netherlands> [accessed 2 June 1BC]
Latief, Syafrijal, and Anna Erliyana Chandra, ‘Penerapan Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Melalui Upaya Administrasi: Perbandingan Indonesia, Australia Dan Belanda’, Journal of Judicial Review, 22/2 (2020), 215–28
Lee, Ilhyung, ‘The Law and Culture of the Apology in Korean Dispute Settlement (with Japan and the United States in Mind)’, Mich. J. Int’l L., 27 (2005), 1
Lester, Jessica Nina, Yonjoo Cho, and Chad R Lochmiller, ‘Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point’, Human Resource Development Review, 19/1 (2020), 94–106
Muchsan, Peradilanadministrasi Negara(State Administrative Court) (Yogyakarta, 1981)
Nabatchi, Tina, ‘Public Values Frames in Administration and Governance’, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1/1 (2018), 59–72
O’Leary, Rosemary, and Tracy Yandle, ‘Environmental Management at the Millennium: The Use of Environmental Dispute Resolution by State Governments’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10/1 (2000), 137–55
Olsen, Johan, ‘Towards a European Administrative Space?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 10/4 (2003), 506–31
Phahlevy, Rifqi Ridlo, and Aidul Fitriciada Azhari, ‘Pergeseran Paradigma Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia Dan Belanda’, Arena Hukum, 12/3 (2019), 576–91
Pollock, Joycelyn M, Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in Criminal Justice (2021)
Purnomo, Vicki Dwi, ‘Transaction Fraud Buy and Sell Online Through Restitution as Criminal Addition in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law’, Asian Journal of Community Services, 2/3 (2023), 265–86
Rosenbloom, David H, Robert S Kravchuk, and Richard M Clerkin, Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector (2022)
Rosida, Heni, Nadiyah Meyliana Putri, Ayu Putri Rainah Petung Banjaransari, Ahsana Nadiyya, and Christ Sella, ‘The Effectiveness of The Implementation of The E-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia’, Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 2/2 (2022)
Simanjuntak, Enrico, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi (2021)
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, and A’an Efendi, Penelitian Hukum: Legal Research (2022)
Tjandra, W Riawan, ‘Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Conseil d’etat Sebagai Institusi Pengawas Tindakan Hukum Tata Usaha Negara’, Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 20/3 SE-Articles (2016), 423–39
Uline, Cynthia L, Megan Tschannen-Moran, and Lynne Perez, ‘Constructive Conflict: How Controversy Can Contribute to School Improvement’, Teachers College Record, 105/5 (2003), 782–816