THE SYNERGISTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STRATEGIC PHYSIOGNOMY AND ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVISATION AND THEIR ROLE IN ACHIEVING ENTREPRENEURIAL PERFORMANCE - KARBALA REFINERY PROJECT AUTHORIT

Main Article Content

MOHAMMED HUSSEIN RADHI, FADHIL RADHI GHABASH

Abstract

Purpose: The current study aims to know the synergistic relationship between strategic foresight and organizational improvisation and their role in achieving pioneering performance, by exploring the opinions of a sample of leaders, managers and heads of departments in the researched companies on a sample of workers in the Oil Projects Company - Karbala Refinery Project Authority.


Design/methodology: The problem of the study was identified by a number of questions, the most important of which was (Is achieving entrepreneurial performance a function of both strategic insight and organizational improvisation? What is the size of the impact of each of them in achieving entrepreneurial performance) What is the extent of its importance to them and what is the nature and level of interest in it? The industrial sector, and the low achievement of entrepreneurial performance is due to weakness in organizational improvisation or lack of effective investment in strategic insight in the number of companies surveyed. After sorting and checking the data, the number of valid questionnaires for analysis was (302) out of a total of (333) questionnaires retrieved.


The current study sought to select a number of main and sub-hypotheses related to the correlations and influence relationships between the variables of the study. In order to answer the questions related to the problem of the study and reach the objectives set, and in order to process the data, many statistical methods were used (normal distribution, arithmetic mean, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equations modeling) using the SPSS25 statistical program, Smartpls program, and Amose v.25 program.


Theoretical results: There is a knowledge gap about the interpretation of the nature of the relationship between the variables of the current study represented by the two independent variables organizational improvisation and strategic insight and the dependent variable entrepreneurial performance.


Practical results: The study reached several results, the most important of which was that each of the variables of organizational improvisation and strategic physiognomy are related and affected by the entrepreneurial performance variable.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

MOHAMMED HUSSEIN RADHI, FADHIL RADHI GHABASH

1MOHAMMED HUSSEIN RADHI, 2FADHIL RADHI GHABASH

1University of Kufa, Iraq

2University of Kufa, Iraq

 

References

Abuseem, A. J., Ojiako, U., & Dweiri, F. T.(2023). An Exploration of the Notion of Improvisation within Project and Project Management.‏

Al-Nooh, Bin Abdullah, (2004) Measurement and Evaluation: Principles of Educational Research, Dar Al-Hamid for Publishing and Distribution, first edition, Amman _ Jordan

Al-Rubaie, Riam Qassem Muhammad, (2021), The Impact of Strategic Physiognomy on Organizational Prosperity by Mediating Knowledge Sharing, a PhD thesis submitted to the Council of the College of Administration and Economics University of Baghdad as part of the requirements for obtaining a PhD in Philosophy in Public Administration Sciences. Master Thesis.

Alsaqal, A. H., Ahmed, H. A., & Abdullah, A. J. (2021). The Role Of Strategic Physiognomy To Avoid The Strategic Drift. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1-11.‏

Borghini, S. (2005). Organizational creativity: breaking equilibrium and order to innovate. Journal of knowledge management, 9(4), 19-33.‏

Ciuchta, M. P., O’Toole, J., & Miner, A. S. (2021). The organizational improvisation landscape: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Management, 47(1), 288-316.‏

Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high‐performance work practices matter? A meta‐analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel psychology, 59(3), 501-528.‏

Delmar, F. (1996). Entrepreneurial behavior and business performance.‏

Dirgantara, R. (2022). Empowerment Strategy Of Fishery Products As Economic Resilience In The Coastal Marine. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 2(1), 37-45.‏

Dislers, D., Keskula, G., & Kostadinova, M. (2016). Strategic Renewal: Implications on Competitive Advantage: A case study of an innovative SME in a growing industry.‏رسالة

Entebang, H. A. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and corporate entrepreneurship performance of Government-linked companies in Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Queen's University Belfast).‏

Fahnestock, J. (1981). The heroine of irregular features: Physiognomy and conventions of heroine description. Victorian Studies, 24(3), 325-350.‏

Fernandes Rodrigues Alves, M., Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina, S., & Dobelin, S. (2018). Literature on organizational innovation: past and future. Innovation & Management Review, 15(1), 2-19.‏

Fisher, C. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2019). The experience of improvising in organizations: A creative process perspective. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(2), 148-162.‏

Fry, L. W., Latham, J. R., Clinebell, S. K., & Krahnke, K. (2017). Spiritual leadership as a model for performance excellence: a study of Baldrige award recipients. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 14(1), 22-47.‏

Gupta, R., & Banerjee, P. (2016). Antecedents of organisational creativity: a multi-level approach. Business: Theory and Practice, 17, 167.‏

Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2015). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437-459.‏

Hair, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2020). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.‏

Harfouche, A., Quinio, B., Saba, M., & Saba, P. B. (2022). The Recursive Theory of Knowledge Augmentation: Integrating human intuition and knowledge in Artificial Intelligence to augment organizational knowledge. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-16.‏

Horwitch, M., & Whipple, M. (2014). Leaders who inspire: A 21st-century approach to developing your talent. Bain & Company, Inc.[Web:] http://www. bain. com/Images/BAIN_BRIEF_Leaders_who_inspire. pdf.[Date of access: 16 Apr 2016].‏

Hoskisson, R. E., Covin, J., Volberda, H. W., & Johnson, R. A. (2011). Revitalizing entrepreneurship: The search for new research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1141-1168.‏

Hu, H., Lu, H., Huang, T., Wei, W. X., Mao, C., & Thomson, S. B. (2022). The Process Of Resource Bricolage And Organizational Improvisation In Information Technology Innovation: A Case Study Of BDZX In China. Information Technology For Development, 28(2), 275-296.‏

Jamal, D. H. (2022). THE EFFECT OF STRATEGIC PHYSIOGNOMY IN ACHIEVING ORGANIZATIONAL INGENUITY, AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF THE OPINIONS OF A SAMPLE OF WORKERS IN THE TOURISM AUTHORITY. World Bulletin Of Management And Law, 11, 50-61.‏

Kamoche, K., Cunha, M. P. E., & Cunha, J. V. D. (2003). Towards a theory of organizational improvisation: Looking beyond the jazz metaphor. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2023-2051.‏

Kashkoul, Hussein Muhammad Ali Abd (2020), The role of strategic insight in achieving cyber marketing through the mediating role of sweeping innovation, an applied study in the Noor Al-Kafeel Industrial Company. thesis

Keil, T. (2004). Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799-825.‏

Kuhn, D., Arvidsson, T. S., Lesperance, R., & Corprew, R. (2017). Can engaging in science practices promote deep understanding of them?. Science Education, 101(2), 232-250.‏

Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia's corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(4), 60-71.‏

Lasrado, F., & Thirlwall, A. (2015). Peak Performance Prism: A conceptual model of people enablers in organisations.‏

Lim, W. L., & Xavier, S. R. (2015). Opportunity recognition framework: Exploring the technology entrepreneurs. American Journal of economics, 5(2), 105-111.‏

Malenko, N. (2022). Information flows, organizational structure, and corporate governance. Organizational Structure, and Corporate Governance (August 2, 2022).‏

Mattone, J. (2013). Intelligent leadership: What you need to know to unlock your full potential. Amacom Books.‏

Miner, A. S., & O’Toole, J. (2020). Organizational learning and organizational improvisation. The Oxford handbook of group and organization learning, 57-78.‏

Ngek, N. B. (2015). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) and small business performance: The mediating effect of entrepreneurial mindset and openness to experience. Problems and Perspectives in Management, (13, Iss. 4 (contin.)), 271-280.‏

Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization Science, 25(6), 1785-1806.‏

Raa'd Adnan, A. P. D. (2022). Diagnosing the reality of strategic physiognomy: An exploratory study of the opinions of a sample of administrative leaders at the University of Mosul. Tikrit Journal of Administration and Economics Sciences, 18(59 part 2).‏

Razavi, S. H., & Attarnezhad, O. (2013). Management of organizational innovation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1).‏

Reimsbach, D., & Hauschild, B. (2012). Corporate venturing: an extended typology. Journal of Management Control, 23, 71-80.‏

Soluman, S. A., & Jamal, D. H. (2022). The Effect Of Strategic Physiognomy Enhancing Organizational Success Of Touristic Organizations: An Exploratory Study In The Ministry Of Culture, Tourism

Songkajorn, Y., Aujirapongpan, S., Jiraphanumes, K., & Pattanasing, K. (2022). Organizational Strategic Intuition for High Performance: The Role of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 117.‏

Stockhinger, J., & Werner, M. (2022). Reconciling Deliberateness and Emergence in Digital Transformation Strategy Formation–An Organizational Improvisation Perspective.‏

Tjørnehøj, G., & Mathiassen, L. (2010). Improvisation during process-technology adoption: a longitudinal study of a software firm. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 20-34.‏

Tsang, K. K., Wang, G., & Bai, H. (2022). Enabling School Bureaucracy, Psychological Empowerment, and Teacher Burnout: A Mediation Analysis. Sustainability, 14(4), 2047.‏

van Vuuren, J., & Botha, M. (2010). The practical application of an entrepreneurial performance training model in South Africa. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(4), 607-625.‏

Vuckic, A. (2012). Uncovering the Mystery of Improvisation in project Management. Master of Science Thesies, University Gotdborg, Sweden, Northumbria.‏

Yu, T., & Li, X. (2022). The relationship between organizational improvisation and economic performance by moderating effects of regional economic level, market environment and cultural background: a meta-analysis. Operations Management Research, 1-18.‏