UNRELIABLE CONFESSIONS IN MURDER CASES: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF THE REVERSED JUDICIAL DECISIONS IN PAKISTAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Different researchers produced enormous literature on false confession by employing different methodologies, including doctrinal research, surveys, experiments and trial transcripts. These studies documented the existence, causes, and effects of false confession. In addition, these studies examined the authenticity of confession, how the police obtain a false confession and the behavioral and psychological process behind false confession. However, many of the studies could not investigate the errors that the trials courts and the first appellate courts commit while drawing the inference of guilt of the accused from confession. As a result, the question “what errors do the trial courts and the first appellate courts commit while reasoning with confession” has not been the subject of much analysis. The present study is an effort to address that gap in the literature. After qualitative content analysis of the five appellate courts’ decisions, this article found that the trial courts and the first appellate courts used inadmissible, implausible, contradictory, and uncorroborated confession against the accused in murder cases in Pakistan. Morover, the trial courts and the first appellate courts failed to look into the possibility of alternative inference which could have been drawn from the confession.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
"Slow March to the Gallows: Death Penalty in Pakistan." Pakistan: Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, 2004, 1-64. Accessed November 22, 2017. Available at: https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/Pakistan464angconjointpdm.pdf
"The Pakistan Capital Punishment Study: A Study of the Capital Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Pakistan." Foundation for Fundamental Rights and Reprieve, 2019.
Abbas, Hassan. "Reforming Pakistan’s Police and Law Enforcement Infrastructure." Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace, 2011.
Anderson, Terence, David Schum, and William Twining. Analysis of Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Bengtsson, Mariette. "How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis." NursingPlus Open 2 (2016): 8-14.
Bouchard, EM. Convicting the Innocent: Sixty-Five Actual Errors of Criminal Justice. New York: Doubleday, 1932.
Crump, David. "Why Do We Admit Criminal Confessions into Evidence?" Seattle University Law Review 43 (2019): 71-98.
District Attorney, Kings County. 426 Years: An Examination of 25 Wrongful Convictions in Brooklyn. New York: District Attorney, Kings County, 2020.
Garrett, Brandon L. "The Substance of False Confessions." Stanford Law Review 62 (2009): 1051-118.
Gelman, Andrew, James S. Liebman, Valerie West, and Alexander Kiss. "A Broken System: The Persistent Patterns of Reversals of Death Sentences in the United States." Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1, no. 2 (2004): 209-261.
Groscup, Jennifer Leigh. "Judicial Decision Making About Expert Testimony in the Aftermath of Daubert and Kumho." Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 4, no. 2 (2004): 57-66.
Gubi-Kelm, Silvia, Tuule Grolig, Benjamin Strobel, Simon Ohlig, and Alexander F. Schmidt. "When Do False Accusations Lead to False Confessions? Preliminary Evidence for a Potentially Overlooked Alternative Explanation." Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 20, no. 2 (2020): 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2020.
Gudjonsson, Gisli H. "Psychology Brings Justice: The Science of Forensic Psychology." Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 13, no. 3 (2003): 159-167.
Guo, Zhiyuan. "Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Confessions in China: An Empirical Perspective." The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 21, no. 1-2 (2017): 30-51.
Hall, Mark A., and Ronald Wright. "Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Opinions." California Law Review 96 (2008): 63-122.
Ho, Hock Lai. A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Holt, Glenys A., and Matthew A. Palmer. "The Variable Influence of Confession Inconsistencies: How Factual Errors (but Not Contradictions) Reduce Belief in Suspect Guilt." Applied Cognitive Psychology 35, no. 1 (2021): 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3757.
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. "Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis." Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (2005): 1277-1288.
Jiahong, He, and He Ran. "Empirical Studies of Wrongful Convictions in Mainland China." University of Cincinnati Law Review 80, no. 4 (2011): 1277-1292.
Johnson, MB. "The Interrogation of Michael Crowe: A Film Review Focused on Education and Training." American Journal of Forensic Psychology 21, no. 3 (2003): 71-79.
Kamin, Sam. "Harmless Error and the Rights/Remedies Split." Virginia Law Review 88, no. 1 (2002): 1-67.
Kassin, Saul M., and Gisli H. Gudjonsson. "The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5, no. 2 (2004): 33-67.
Laudan, Larry. Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Leo, Richard A. "False Confessions: Causes, Consequences and Implications." The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 37, no. 3 (2009): 332-343.
Leo, Richard A., and Deborah Davis. "From False Confession to Wrongful Conviction: Seven Psychological Processes." The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 38, no. 1-2 (2010): 9-56.
Leo, Richard A., and Richard J. Ofshe. "Consequences of False Confessions: Deprivations of Liberty and Miscarriages of Justice in the Age of Psychological Interrogation." Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88, no. 2 (1997): 429-496. https://doi.org/10.2307/1144288.
Little, Rory K. "Addressing the Evidentiary Sources of Wrongful Convictions: Categorical Exclusion of Evidence in Capital Statutes." Southwestern University Law Review 37 (2008): 965-986.
Lowenstein, Allard K. "A 'Most Serious Crime': Pakistan's Unlawful Use of the Death Penalty." Justice Project Pakistan, Yale Law School's Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, 2016, 1-61.
McCormick, CT. Handbook of the Law of Evidence, 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: West, 1972, 316.
Niland, Haven, and Daniele Ortu. "Confessions Selected by Consequences: An Operant Analysis of False Confessions and Interrogation Techniques." Behavior and Social Issues 29 (2020): 162-194.
Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2013.
Salehijam, Maryam. "The Value of Systematic Content Analysis in Legal Research." Tilburg Law Review 23, no. 1-2 (2018): 34-42.
Sinopole, Roberta C. "Admissibility of an out-of-Court Confession: Inability to Make an in-Court Identification of the Defendant as the out-of-Court Confessor, Despite Exactness of Names and Other Circumstantial Evidence of Identity, Goes to the Admissibility Rather Than to the Weight of the Confession. Woodson V. State, 325 Md. 251, 600 A. 2d 420 (1992)." University of Baltimore Law Review 22, no. 2 (1993), 392.
Tepfer, Joshua A., Craig M. Cooley, and Tara Thompson. "Convenient Scapegoats: Juvenile Confessions and Exculpatory DNA in Cook County, Illinois." Northwestern University School of Law, Faculty Working Papers. Paper 221, 2011, 1-56.
Wagenaar, Willem A., Peter J. Van Koppen, and Hans FM Crombag. The Psychology of Criminal Evidence Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence. Harvester Wheatsheaf: St. Martin's Press, 1993.
Wilson, Lawrence L. "Extra-Judicial Confessions-Sufficiency of Corroboration." Nebraska Law Review 33, no. 3 (1953): 495-506.