THE DISSOLUTION OF DESCENDED CASTE MARRIAGE AND ITS IMPLICATION ON BALINESE WOMEN: HUMAN RIGHT PERSPECTIVES

Main Article Content

I. NYOMAN SUJANA, FAISAL SANTIAGO, EDY LISDIONO

Abstract

This paper analysis the dissolution of inter-caste marriages, nyerod ‘descended caste’ marriages, and their implications for Balinese women in the perspective of human rights. The focus of this research is the position of Balinese triwangsa caste women (those who are from Brahmana, Ksatriya, and Wesya) whose nyerod marriages are dissolved. The method used was the empirical legal research method using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, an analytical approach, a sociological approach and a human rights approach. As an analytical tool for the legal issues studied, the theory of Human Rights (HAM) was applied because factually the Balinese customary law community is still attached to the recognition of caste even though there has been a Bali DPRD decision Number 11 of 1951 which negates the implementation Patiwangi ceremony, the ceremony of neutralizing one's caste position. The data used were obtained through direct observation and interviews with informants based on purposive sampling technique. The result of the analysis shows that the existence of caste in the Balinese customary law community is actually a burden for triwangsa women whose marriages are dissolved, because the Balinese triwangsa women who have chosen the nyerod marriages are considered out of their original caste, so they can no longer be recognized as part of the triwangsa clan, even though from a human rights perspective the Balinese customary law community highly respects human rights. However, in the event that the marriage was dissolved, socio-culturally it turned out that the elderly people from Puri or Griya, those who belong to triwangsa did not re-recognize the caste of Balinese women who were returning to their home family, even though they were their own biological children. The strong attitude of the elderly people of the Puri or Griya palaces in refusing nyerod marriages bring implication that the triwangsa women were afraid and ashamed to return to their original homes/family because they feel they are no longer part of the triwangsa clan.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

I. NYOMAN SUJANA, FAISAL SANTIAGO, EDY LISDIONO

I Nyoman Sujana1, Faisal Santiago2, Edy Lisdiono3

Faculty of Law, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia1

Faculty of Law, Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia2

Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang, Indonesia3

References

Abdullah, R. (2004). Perkembngan HAM dan Keberadaan Peradilan HAM di Indonesia. Bogor: Galia Indonesia.

Aditi, I. G. A. (2019). Problematic and alternative solutions of different wangsa marriage at Balinese community in Lombok. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 84-94.

Adnyani, N. K. S. (2019). Status of Women After Dismissed from Mixed Marriage in Bali's Law Perspective. Ganesha Law Review, 1(2), 73-89.

Agung, A. A. I. (2016). Makna purusa dan pradana dalam putusan hakim mengenai sengketa waris adat Bali. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya (Doctoral dissertation).

Budiana, I. N., & Wiguna, M. O. C. (2021). Researching Social Change in Bali Indigenous Marriage Private. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 4(2), 75-85.

Dewi, I. A. M. L. (2014). Implikasi perkawinan beda kasta dalam perspektif hukum, sosial-budaya dan religius di Banjar Brahmana Bukit, Kecamatan Bangli, Kabupaten Bangli. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 2(2). https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id.

Diantha, I. M. P. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

El-Muhtaj, M. (2013). Dimensi-dimensi HAM: mengurai hak ekonomi, sosial, dan budaya. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Ghofur, A. A. (2006). Filsafat Hukum Sejarah, Aliran dan Pemaknaan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press;

Ghofur, A. A. (2011). Hukum Perkawinan Islam: Perspektif Fikih dan Hukum Positif. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Irwansyah, I. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Muhammad, A. (2000). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti,

Panetje, G. (1989). Aneka catatan tentang hukum adat Bali. Bali: Guna Agung.

Praminatih, G. A. (2021). Shifting Speech Levels: Exploring Balinese Women’s Language in Inter-Caste Marriage Communication Contexts. Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies), 11(1), 61-76.

Putri, D. (2019). Fenomena Pernikahan beda kasta di Bali dan Perawan Tua. Available: https://bali.idntimes.com/life/women/diantari-putri/pernikahan-beda-kasta-di-bali-dan-perawan-tua (Accessed, April 29, 2022).

Subekti, R. (2005). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudiana, I. G. N., Relin, D. E., Kartika, N. G. A., & Ningrat, J. A. (2018). Upacara Pati Wangi Pada Perkawinan Antar Klen Di Bali. Bali: IHDN Press

Sukandia, I. N. (2019). Lembaga perkreditan desa: berbasis masyarakat hukum adat di Bali. Malang: Nuswantara.

Tumpa, H. A., Halim, H., Sampurno, S., & Jurdi, F. (2010). Peluang & tantangan eksistensi pengadilan HAM di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Wiana, K., & Santeri, R. (1993). Kasta dalam Hindu: Kesalahpahaman berabad-abad. Denpasar: Yayasan Dharma Naradha.