REVIEWING THE CONCEPT OF NOTARY CIVIL PARTNERSHIP IN INDONESIAN LEGAL ARRANGEMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
The shift to a notary which was originally prohibited is now allowed after Indonesia has its own Regulations regarding the Notary Position. In practice in Indonesia, only a few notaries form partnerships, this is different from the notaries in the Netherlands, where the majority of them form alliances with other professions. The purpose of this study is to determine the essence of the concept of a notary civil partnership in Indonesia and how the concept of a notary civil partnership exists. The research method used is a normative/doctrinal legal research method using three (3) approaches, namely, statue approach, historical approach, comparative approach, and interviews. The results of the study show that the essence of a notary civil partnership is to provide efficiency that can elevate the dignity related to the welfare of a notary in order to have a proper office and improve legal services and services. The current concept is only limited to a joint office, in terms of office management but not for doing work, considering that the work of a notary is individual
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Afifah, K. (2017). Tanggung jawab dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris secara Perdata terhadap Akta yang dibuatnya. Lex Renaissance, 2(1), 10-10.
Al-Shabatat, M. A. Z. (2021). Adopting a limited liability partnership for the legal profession in the partnership law: a critical review from Indonesia's perspective. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(2), 1-17.
Brink, D. O. (1986). Utilitarian morality and the personal point of view. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(8), 417-438.
Budiono, H. (2015). Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Crimmins, J. E. (1996). Contending interpretations of Bentham's utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 29(4), 751-777.
Fatin, D. A. (2020). Analysis of Civil Service Fellows Based on Article 20 Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Position Notary. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 98, 1.
Isra, S. (2009). Kekuasaan dan perilaku korupsi: Catatan hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas,
Lisdiyono, E., Setiyowati, S., & Wijayanti, E. I. (2018). Kajian Yuridis tentang Sewa Menyewa Aset Yayasan Rumah Sakit kepada Rumah Sakit yang Berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas: Studi Kasus pada PT. Senuk Jaya Husada. Lex Publica, 5(1), 32–43.
Mariyam, S., & Setiyowati, S. (2021). Legality of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology in Public Service Transformation: Possibilities and Challenges. Lex Publica, 8(2), 75-88.
Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada group
Mowoka, V. P. (2014). Pelaksanaan Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta yang Dibuatnya. Lex Et Societatis, 2(4).
Mulgan, R. (2007). Truth in government and the politicization of public service advice. Public administration, 85(3), 569-586.
NNP. (2017). Ikatan Notaris Indonesia Mulai Himpun Data-Data Notaris se-Indonesia. Available at https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ikatan-notaris-indonesia-mulai-himpun-data-data-notaris-se-indonesia-lt587dd1670518b
Radbruch, G. (1961). Einfuehrung In Die rechtswissenschaft, 1961. Stuttgart: Koehler Verlag.